Literature DB >> 25578535

The risk of birth defects after assisted reproduction.

Fabio Parazzini1, Sonia Cipriani, Giuseppe Bulfoni, Camilla Bulfoni, Ambrogio Frigerio, Edgardo Somigliana, Fabio Mosca.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to investigate the association between congenital malformations and type of conception (spontaneous or medically assisted).
METHODS: This is a population based study using data from the regional data base of Lombardy, a Northern Italian Region with a population of about 10 million inhabitants. Included in the study were 277,043 neonates born in Lombardy during the study period 2010-2012. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (OR), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), of congenital abnormalities were calculated using unconditional multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 7057 births (2.5%) were reported after non spontaneous conception. Overall, the frequency of birth defects was 4.4% among births after spontaneous conception and 6.7% among births after non spontaneous ones (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.5-1.9). The association disappeared after taking into account the confounding effect of maternal age and factors associated with non spontaneous conception. The crude OR of abnormalities was higher than unity for any defect (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.5-1.9), multiple defects (OR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.3-2.3), cardiovascular (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.8-2.4), musculoskeletal (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.7-2.5) and metabolic system abnormalities (OR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.1-3.5). Almost all these associations, however, disappeared after taking into account potential confounding with the exception of musculoskeletal defects (adjusted OR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.1-1.6). In this case also, if adjustment for multiple comparison is taking into account, results did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis confirm the recently emerging view that the increased frequency of birth defects observed after ART/medically induced ovulation only is largely due to confounders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25578535      PMCID: PMC4363237          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0398-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  13 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Frans M Helmerhorst; Denise A M Perquin; Diane Donker; Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23

2.  A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility.

Authors:  Alfred A Rimm; Alyce C Katayama; K Paul Katayama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Alice M Jaques; David J Amor; H W Gordon Baker; David L Healy; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Sue Breheny; Claire Garrett; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Ericson; B Källén
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects.

Authors:  Michael J Davies; Vivienne M Moore; Kristyn J Willson; Phillipa Van Essen; Kevin Priest; Heather Scott; Eric A Haan; Annabelle Chan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Wen; Jie Jiang; Chenyue Ding; Juncheng Dai; Yao Liu; Yankai Xia; Jiayin Liu; Zhibin Hu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Birth defects and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Joe Leigh Simpson
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hansen; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Elizabeth Milne; Nicholas de Klerk; Carol Bower
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Rita Isaksson; M Gissler; A Tiitinen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Joep Geraedts; Pascal Borry; Martina C Cornel; Wybo Dondorp; Luca Gianaroli; Gary Harton; Tanya Milachich; Helena Kääriäinen; Inge Liebaers; Michael Morris; Jorge Sequeiros; Karen Sermon; Françoise Shenfield; Heather Skirton; Sirpa Soini; Claudia Spits; Anna Veiga; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Stéphane Viville; Guido de Wert; Milan Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects: Effects of Subfertility and Multiple Births.

Authors:  Rebecca F Liberman; Kelly D Getz; Dominique Heinke; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Eugene R Declercq; Xiaoli Chen; Angela E Lin; Marlene Anderka
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Pregnancy and offspring outcomes after artificial insemination with donor sperm: A retrospective analysis of 1805 treatment cycles performed in Northwest China.

Authors:  Aiping Zhang; Xiaoling Ma; Lili Zhang; Xuehong Zhang; Weihua Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  An Update on Oxidative Damage to Spermatozoa and Oocytes.

Authors:  Chinyerum S Opuwari; Ralf R Henkel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of neonatal outcomes and live-birth defects after progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: A large retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ningling Wang; Jiaying Lin; Qianqian Zhu; Yong Fan; Yun Wang; Yonglun Fu; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Trend of medically induced monozygotic twin deliveries according to age, parity, and type of assisted reproductive technique during the period 2007-2017 in Lombardy Region, Northern Italy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Giovanna Esposito; Edgardo Somigliana; Matteo Franchi; Chiara Dallagiovanna; Valerio Pisaturo; Giovanni Corrao; Fabio Parazzini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effects of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on natural and ART-mediated birth rates in Lombardy Region, Northern Italy.

Authors:  Edgardo Somigliana; Giovanna Esposito; Paola Viganò; Matteo Franchi; Giovanni Corrao; Fabio Parazzini
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects in a Chinese birth cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Lv; Feiyang Diao; Jiangbo Du; Ting Chen; Qingxia Meng; Xiufeng Ling; Hong Li; Ci Song; Qi Xi; Yangqian Jiang; Yan Xu; Shiyao Tao; Lei Huang; Mingyang Wen; Meijuan Peng; Cong Liu; Qun Lu; Yuanlin He; Yin Yin; Xiaoyu Liu; Bo Xu; Xiumei Han; Kun Zhou; Tao Jiang; Yang Zhao; Hongxia Ma; Guangfu Jin; Yankai Xia; Jiayin Liu; Yuan Lin; Zhibin Hu; Hongbing Shen
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-01-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.