OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinicoradiologic features of tumours with echinoderm anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, or wild type (WT) for both genes in a cohort of patients with lung adenocarcinoma to identify useful characteristics of different gene statuses. METHODS: In 346 lung adenocarcinoma patients, ALK rearrangements were confirmed with fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and EGFR mutations were determined by pyrosequencing assay. Patients were divided into three groups: ALK rearrangement (ALK+ group, n = 48), EGFR mutation (EGFR+ group, n = 166), and WT for both genes (WT group, n = 132). Chest computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in all patients. The percentages of ground-glass opacity volume (pGGO) and tumour shadow disappearance rate (TDR) were measured using semi-automated nodule assessment software. RESULTS: The pGGO was significantly lower in the ALK+ group (25.1 % ± 24.3) than in the EGFR+ group (37.2 % ± 25.7, p < 0.001) and the WT group (36.1 % ± 24.6, p = 0.001). The TDR in the ALK+ group (17.3 % ± 25.1) was significantly lower than in the EGFR+ group (26.8 % ± 24.9, p = 0.002) and the WT group (25.7 % ± 24.6, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Solid pattern with lower incidence of lobulated border, finely spiculated margins, pleural retraction, and bubble-like lucency on CT imaging are the main characteristics of ALK rearrangement tumours. KEY POINTS: • EGFR/ALK testing is recommended for lung adenocarcinoma patients for EGFR/ALK-targeted TKI therapy. • EGFR /ALK testing is restricted by limited tissue samples and cost pressures. • Lower pGGO and TDR are the main clinicoradiological characteristics of ALK+ tumours. • pGGO and TDR are predictive factors for selecting patients for ALK/EGFR testing.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinicoradiologic features of tumours with echinoderm anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, or wild type (WT) for both genes in a cohort of patients with lung adenocarcinoma to identify useful characteristics of different gene statuses. METHODS: In 346 lung adenocarcinomapatients, ALK rearrangements were confirmed with fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and EGFR mutations were determined by pyrosequencing assay. Patients were divided into three groups: ALK rearrangement (ALK+ group, n = 48), EGFR mutation (EGFR+ group, n = 166), and WT for both genes (WT group, n = 132). Chest computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in all patients. The percentages of ground-glass opacity volume (pGGO) and tumour shadow disappearance rate (TDR) were measured using semi-automated nodule assessment software. RESULTS: The pGGO was significantly lower in the ALK+ group (25.1 % ± 24.3) than in the EGFR+ group (37.2 % ± 25.7, p < 0.001) and the WT group (36.1 % ± 24.6, p = 0.001). The TDR in the ALK+ group (17.3 % ± 25.1) was significantly lower than in the EGFR+ group (26.8 % ± 24.9, p = 0.002) and the WT group (25.7 % ± 24.6, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Solid pattern with lower incidence of lobulated border, finely spiculated margins, pleural retraction, and bubble-like lucency on CT imaging are the main characteristics of ALK rearrangement tumours. KEY POINTS: • EGFR/ALK testing is recommended for lung adenocarcinomapatients for EGFR/ALK-targeted TKI therapy. • EGFR /ALK testing is restricted by limited tissue samples and cost pressures. • Lower pGGO and TDR are the main clinicoradiological characteristics of ALK+ tumours. • pGGO and TDR are predictive factors for selecting patients for ALK/EGFR testing.
Authors: K Takamochi; K Nagai; J Yoshida; K Suzuki; Y Ohde; M Nishimura; S Sasaki; Y Nishiwaki Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jennifer M Boland; Jin Sung Jang; Jun Li; Adam M Lee; Jason A Wampfler; Michele R Erickson-Johnson; Ibere Soares; Ping Yang; Jin Jen; Andre M Oliveira; Eunhee S Yi Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Juheon Lee; Yi Cui; Xiaoli Sun; Bailiang Li; Jia Wu; Dengwang Li; Michael F Gensheimer; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn; Ruijiang Li Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Chintan Parmar; Ying Liu; Thibaud P Coroller; Gisele Cruz; Olya Stringfield; Zhaoxiang Ye; Mike Makrigiorgos; Fiona Fennessy; Raymond H Mak; Robert Gillies; John Quackenbush; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 12.701