Literature DB >> 25576431

Decision-making preferences of Jordanian women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Rana Obeidat1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine Jordanian women's preferences regarding participation in decision-making related to their breast cancer treatment.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design was used in this study. A convenience sample of 156 Jordanian women, who had a confirmed, first-time diagnosis of breast cancer within 18 months prior to the study and had undergone treatment at three hospitals in Central and Northern Jordan, was recruited for the study. A modified version of the Control Preferences Scale was used for data collection.
RESULTS: More than half of the participants (57 %) wanted the physician to make the decision about the appropriate treatment, approximately 33 % wanted to share the decision with the physician, and only 10 % wanted to make their own decisions. Participants aged more than 50 years, those with secondary school education or less, and those who were undergoing treatment at the public or teaching hospital under study were more likely to prefer a passive role in decision-making regarding treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Although more than half of the participants involved in this study preferred to play a passive role, their preferences in this regard varied. This highlighted the importance of individually assessing patients' preferences regarding participation in the decision-making process and provision of information that is tailored according to each patient's needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25576431     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2594-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

1.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  The Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan; P Venkatesh
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1997

3.  Decision-making preferences and information needs among Greek breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Augoustina Almyroudi; Lesley F Degner; Vassiliki Paika; Nicholaos Pavlidis; Thomas Hyphantis
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Measuring men's preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Health-related information exchange experiences of Jordanian women at breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Rana F Obeidat; Robin M Lally
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Controlling fear: Jordanian women's perceptions of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Rana F Obeidat; Suzanne S Dickerson; Gregory G Homish; Nesreen M Alqaissi; Robin M Lally
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

8.  The attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward the disclosure of terminal illness.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Chang Geol Lee; Si-young Kim; Sang-wook Lee; Dae Seog Heo; Jun Suk Kim; Keun Seok Lee; Young Seon Hong; Jung Suk Lee; Chang Hoon You
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Gill Hubbard; Lisa Kidd; Edward Donaghy
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 2.398

10.  Concordance between patients' desired and actual decision-making roles in breast cancer care.

Authors:  Barbara A Vogel; Almut W Helmes; Annette Hasenburg
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.894

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Participation in treatment decision-making among Chinese-Australian women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Cannas Kwok; Fung Kuen Koo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Disclosure of Cancer Diagnosis: an Individualized and Non-paternalistic Approach Is Preferred.

Authors:  Mohammad Al Qadire
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Preferences for Shared Decision Making in Older Adult Patients With Orthopedic Hand Conditions.

Authors:  Agnes Z Dardas; Christopher Stockburger; Sean Boone; Tonya An; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Factors Affecting Jordanian Women's Surgical Treatment Decisions for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rana F Obeidat; Mahmoud Al Masri; Mohammad Marzouq
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-10-04

5.  Unmet Supportive Care Needs of Jordanian Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Raya Yousef Al-Husban; Rana Obeidat; Omar Shamieh
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-08-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.