Literature DB >> 25575493

Clinical characteristics of anastomotic leakage after an anterior resection for rectal cancer by assessing of the international classification on anastomotic leakage.

Kenji Matsuda1, Tsukasa Hotta, Katsunari Takifuji, Shozo Yokoyama, Takashi Watanabe, Yasuyuki Mitani, Junji Ieda, Hiromitsu Iwamoto, Yuki Mizumoto, Hiroki Yamaue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) has proposed a new definition of anastomotic leakage (AL) which was simply classified into three grades; however, these criteria have not been assessed well. The aims of this study are to assess the new definition and to show the clinical features of AL after an anterior resection for rectal cancer.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients developed AL after an anterior resection for rectal cancer was retrospectively assessed. AL was defined by the ISREC criteria.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (54 %) patients with AL were diagnosed by drain contents. The postoperative day of diagnosis for AL was later in grade A versus grades B and C (p = 0.038 vs p = 0.006, respectively). Permanent stoma (PS) was significantly more frequent in patients with grade C but not grade B compared to the patients with no AL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.171, respectively). In patients without diverting stoma, there was more serious grade of AL (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences were observed in the postoperative day of diagnosis, the creation rate of PS, and impact on diverting stoma after AL between each grade of leakage. The new classification was easy and reasonable to evaluate AL. As a result, it should be widely used in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575493     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1272-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  19 in total

1.  Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS).

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Mark Brooke-Smith; Michael Crawford; Rene Adam; Moritz Koch; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Ronald P Dematteo; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Sheung Tat Fan; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Lorenzo Capussotti; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Theodor Junginger; Ursula Gönner; Tong T Trinh; André Lollert; Katja Oberholzer; Manfred Berres
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research.

Authors:  F Merad; J M Hay; A Fingerhut; E Yahchouchi; Y Laborde; E Pélissier; S Msika; Y Flamant
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Moritz Koch; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Nuh N Rahbari; Rene Adam; Lorenzo Capussotti; Sheung Tat Fan; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Michael Crawford; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Mark Brooke-Smith; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Ronald P DeMatteo; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Rickard Lindgren; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Rune Sjödahl; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Kin Wah Chu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Shingo Tsujinaka; Yutaka J Kawamura; Fumio Konishi; Takafumi Maeda; Ken Mizokami
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  6 in total

1.  Colorectal anastomosis dehiscence: a call for more detailed morphological classification.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Jan Rejholoc; Matej Škrovina; Ilja Tachecí; Igor Sirák
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 1.195

2.  Retrospective study of active drainage in the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojie Tan; Mei Zhang; Lai Li; He Wang; Xiaodong Liu; Haitao Jiang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery Induces Hypoperfusion of the Sigmoid Colon Stump During Anterior Resection.

Authors:  Jun Higashijima; Toru Kono; Mitsuo Shimada; Ayumu Sugitani; Hideya Kashihara; Chie Takasu; Masaaki Nishi; Takuya Tokunaga; Kozo Yoshikawa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-13

4.  Transanal drainage tube: alternative option to defunctioning stoma in rectal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Fabio Carboni; Mario Valle; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Manuel Giofrè; Orietta Federici; Settimio Zazza; Alfredo Garofalo
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-05

5.  Neopterin, kynurenine and tryptophan as new biomarkers for early detection of rectal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Tomas Dusek; Julius Orhalmi; Otakar Sotona; Lenka Kujovska Krcmova; Lenka Javorska; Josef Dolejs; Jiri Paral
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower rectal Cancer resection, including drain type: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Tetsushi Kinugasa; Sachiko Nagasu; Kenta Murotani; Tomoaki Mizobe; Takafumi Ochi; Taro Isobe; Fumihiko Fujita; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.