Literature DB >> 25575118

Improving highly accelerated fat fraction measurements for clinical trials in muscular dystrophy: origin and quantitative effect of R2* changes.

Thomas Loughran1, David M Higgins, Michelle McCallum, Anna Coombs, Volker Straub, Kieren G Hollingsworth.   

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the effect of R2* modeling in conventional and accelerated measurements of skeletal muscle fat fraction in control subjects and patients with muscular dystrophy. Materials and Methods Eight patients with Becker muscular dystrophy and eight matched control subjects were recruited with approval from the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee and with written consent. Chemical-shift images with six widely spaced echo times (in 3.5-msec increments) were acquired to correlate R2* and muscle fat fraction. The effect of incorporating or neglecting R2* modeling on fat fraction magnitude and variance was evaluated in a typical three-echo protocol (with 0.78-msec increments). Accelerated acquisitions with this protocol with 3.65×, 4.94×, and 6.42× undersampling were reconstructed by using combined compressed sensing and parallel imaging and fat fraction maps produced with R2* modeling. Results Muscle R2* at 3.0 T (33-125 sec(-1)) depended on the morphology of fat replacement, the highest values occurring with the greatest interdigitation of fat. The inclusion of R2* modeling removed bias, which was greatest at low fat fraction, but did not increase variance. The 95% limits of agreement of the accelerated acquisitions were tight and not degraded by R2* modeling (1.65%, 1.95%, and 2.22% for 3.65×, 4.94×, and 6.42× acceleration, respectively). Conclusion Incorporating R2* modeling prevents systematic errors in muscle fat fraction by up to 3.5% without loss of precision and should be incorporated into all muscular dystrophy studies. Fat fraction measurements can be accelerated fivefold by using combined compressed sensing and parallel imaging, modeling for R2* without loss of fidelity. (©) RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575118     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14141191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging patterns of muscle involvement in genetic muscle diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Doris G Leung
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Skeletal Muscle Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy as an Outcome Measure for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Pierre G Carlier; Benjamin Marty; Olivier Scheidegger; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Pierre-Yves Baudin; Eduard Snezhko; Dmitry Vlodavets
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2016-03-03

3.  Multicenter prospective longitudinal study of magnetic resonance biomarkers in a large duchenne muscular dystrophy cohort.

Authors:  Rebecca J Willcocks; William D Rooney; William T Triplett; Sean C Forbes; Donovan J Lott; Claudia R Senesac; Michael J Daniels; Dah-Jyuu Wang; Ann T Harrington; Gihan I Tennekoon; Barry S Russman; Erika L Finanger; Barry J Byrne; Richard S Finkel; Glenn A Walter; H Lee Sweeney; Krista Vandenborne
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Skeletal muscle water T2 as a biomarker of disease status and exercise effects in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Ami Mankodi; Noura Azzabou; Thomas Bulea; Harmen Reyngoudt; Hirity Shimellis; Yupeng Ren; Eunhee Kim; Kenneth H Fischbeck; Pierre G Carlier
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.296

5.  Upper and Lower Extremities in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Evaluated with Quantitative MRI and Proton MR Spectroscopy in a Multicenter Cohort.

Authors:  Sean C Forbes; Harneet Arora; Rebecca J Willcocks; William T Triplett; William D Rooney; Alison M Barnard; Umar Alabasi; Dah-Jyuu Wang; Donovan J Lott; Claudia R Senesac; Ann T Harrington; Erika L Finanger; Gihan I Tennekoon; John Brandsema; Michael J Daniels; H Lee Sweeney; Glenn A Walter; Krista Vandenborne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Quantification of renal steatosis in type II diabetes mellitus using dixon-based MRI.

Authors:  Takeshi Yokoo; Haley R Clark; Ivan Pedrosa; Qing Yuan; Ivan Dimitrov; Yue Zhang; Ildiko Lingvay; Muhammad S Beg; I Alexandru Bobulescu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Evaluation of skeletal muscle DTI in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  M T Hooijmans; B M Damon; M Froeling; M J Versluis; J Burakiewicz; J J G M Verschuuren; E H Niks; A G Webb; H E Kan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Regional variation in paraspinal muscle composition using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Agnes Zoffl; Daniela Franz; Jan Syväri; Michael Dieckmeyer; Egon Burian; Elisabeth Klupp; Dennis M Hedderich; Christina Holzapfel; Theresa Drabsch; Jan S Kirschke; Ernst J Rummeny; Claus Zimmer; Hans Hauner; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-02

10.  MRI quantifies neuromuscular disease progression.

Authors:  Sean C Forbes; Rebecca J Willcocks; William D Rooney; Glenn A Walter; Krista Vandenborne
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.