Literature DB >> 25574609

Relative Importance of Four Muscle Groups for Indoor Rock Climbing Performance.

Michael R Deyhle1, Hung-Sheng Hsu, Timothy J Fairfield, Taryn L Cadez-Schmidt, Burke A Gurney, Christine M Mermier.   

Abstract

Little research is available to guide training programs for rock climbers. To help meet this need, we sought to determine the relative importance of 4 muscle groups for rock climbing performance. Eleven male climbers were familiarized with an indoor climbing route before 5 separate days of testing. On testing days, subjects were randomly assigned to climb with no prefatiguing exercise (control climb) or after a prefatiguing exercise designed to specifically target the digit flexors (DF), shoulder adductors (SA), elbow flexors (EF), or lumbar flexors (LF). Immediately after the prefatiguing exercise, the subject climbed the route as far as possible without rest until failure. The number of climbing moves was recorded for each climb. Surface electromyography of the target muscles was recorded during the prefatigue. Fewer climbing moves were completed after prefatigue of the DF (50 ± 18%) and EF (78 ± 22%) (p ≤ 0.05) compared with the control climb. The number of moves completed after prefatigue of the LF and SA were not statistically significant compared with the control climb (p > 0.05). The short time lapse between the end of prefatiguing exercise and the start of climbing (transit time), which may have allowed for some recovery, was not different among trials (p > 0.05). Electromyography median frequency was reduced from beginning to end of each prefatiguing exercise. These results suggest that among the muscle groups studied in men, muscular endurance of DF and EF muscle groups is especially important for rock climbing on 40° overhanging terrain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25574609     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Two Types of Active Recovery on Fatigue and Climbing Performance.

Authors:  Pedro L Valenzuela; Pedro de la Villa; Carmen Ferragut
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Changes in blood lactate and muscle activation in elite rock climbers during a 15-m speed climb.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Qingfu Wang; Yuanlong Liu; Nicholas J Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of Two vs. Four Weekly Campus Board Training Sessions on Bouldering Performance and Climbing-Specific Tests in Advanced and Elite Climbers.

Authors:  Nicolay Stien; Helene Pedersen; Vegard A Vereide; Atle H Saeterbakken; Espen Hermans; Jarle Kalland; Brad J Schoenfeld; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Determinants for success in climbing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Dominik Saul; Gino Steinmetz; Wolfgang Lehmann; Arndt F Schilling
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.103

5.  Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers.

Authors:  Nicolay Stien; Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Espen Hermans; Vegard Albert Vereide; Elias Olsen; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.

Authors:  Nicolay Stien; Vegard Albert Vereide; Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Espen Hermans; Matthew Peter Shaw; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.