H J Park1, S Y Lee1, N H Park2, E Kim3, E C Chung1, S H Kook1, J W Lee4. 1. Department of Radiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Myongji Hospital, Dugyang-ku, Hwajong-dong 697-24, Koyang, Kyunggido 412-270, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: radiology11@daum.net. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University School of Medicine, Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the usefulness and diagnostic accuracy of oblique coronal MRI of the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) view for diagnosis of CFL injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 91 patients who were suspected to have CFL injury who underwent CFL view imaging. Anatomical identification of the CFL on orthogonal MRI sequences and CFL views was evaluated. Two radiologists evaluated the CFL based on an entire length view, an entire width view, and margin sharpness using a four-point scale. Diagnostic accuracy using orthogonal and CFL views was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Arthroscopic or clinical findings were used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Both readers found identification of lesions using the entire length, entire width, and sharp margin from CFL view images to be superior to that based on orthogonal images. The sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosing CFL injury were significantly higher when using the CFL view compared to the orthogonal view, although specificity was not significantly different between the CFL view and orthogonal view images. CONCLUSIONS: CFL view imaging enables better anatomical evaluation and improved sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosis of CFL injury. CFL view images should therefore be used to evaluate potential CFL injuries.
AIM: To evaluate the usefulness and diagnostic accuracy of oblique coronal MRI of the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) view for diagnosis of CFL injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 91 patients who were suspected to have CFL injury who underwent CFL view imaging. Anatomical identification of the CFL on orthogonal MRI sequences and CFL views was evaluated. Two radiologists evaluated the CFL based on an entire length view, an entire width view, and margin sharpness using a four-point scale. Diagnostic accuracy using orthogonal and CFL views was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Arthroscopic or clinical findings were used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Both readers found identification of lesions using the entire length, entire width, and sharp margin from CFL view images to be superior to that based on orthogonal images. The sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosing CFL injury were significantly higher when using the CFL view compared to the orthogonal view, although specificity was not significantly different between the CFL view and orthogonal view images. CONCLUSIONS: CFL view imaging enables better anatomical evaluation and improved sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosis of CFL injury. CFL view images should therefore be used to evaluate potential CFL injuries.