Jacqueline Outermans1, Ingrid van de Port2, Harriet Wittink3, Janke de Groot4, Gert Kwakkel5. 1. J. Outermans, MScPT, Research Group Lifestyle and Health, Faculty of Healthcare, Hogeschool Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Bolognahaan 101, 3584 CJ Utrecht, the Netherlands. jacqueline.outermans@hu.nl. 2. I. van de Port, PhD, Revant, Breda, the Netherlands. 3. H. Wittink, PhD, Research Group Lifestyle and Health, Hogeschool Utrecht University of Applied Sciences. 4. J. de Groot, PhD, Research Group Lifestyle and Health, Hogeschool Utrecht University of Applied Sciences. 5. G. Kwakkel, PhD, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Department of Neurorehabilitation, Centre of Rehabilitation and Rheumatology Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Restoration of walking capacity, as reflected by walking speed and walking distance, is a primary goal after stroke. Peak aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption [V̇o₂peak]) is suggested to be correlated with walking capacity after stroke. Although the strength of this correlation is unclear, physical therapy programs often target walking capacity by means of aerobic training. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence on the correlation between V̇o₂peak and walking capacity. DATA SOURCES: The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus were searched up to May 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Cross-sectional studies reporting correlation coefficients between V̇o₂peak and walking capacity in stroke were included, along with longitudinal studies reporting these correlation coefficients at baseline. DATA EXTRACTION: The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using a checklist of 27 items for observational research. Information on study design, stroke severity and recovery, and assessments and outcome of V̇o₂peak and walking capacity, as well as the reported correlation coefficients, were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen studies involving 454 participants were included. Meta-analyses showed combined correlation coefficients (rɱ) for V̇o₂peak and walking speed and for V̇o₂peak and walking distance of .42 (95% credibility interval=.31, .54) and .52 (95% credibility interval=.42, .62), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The studies included in the present review had small sample sizes and low methodological quality. Clinical and methodological diversity challenged the comparability of the included studies, despite statistical homogeneity. Relevant data of 3 studies could not be retrieved. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the correlation of V̇o₂peak with walking speed was low and moderate for V̇o₂peak and walking distance, respectively, indicating that other factors, besides V̇o₂peak, determine walking capacity after stroke.
BACKGROUND: Restoration of walking capacity, as reflected by walking speed and walking distance, is a primary goal after stroke. Peak aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption [V̇o₂peak]) is suggested to be correlated with walking capacity after stroke. Although the strength of this correlation is unclear, physical therapy programs often target walking capacity by means of aerobic training. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence on the correlation between V̇o₂peak and walking capacity. DATA SOURCES: The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus were searched up to May 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Cross-sectional studies reporting correlation coefficients between V̇o₂peak and walking capacity in stroke were included, along with longitudinal studies reporting these correlation coefficients at baseline. DATA EXTRACTION: The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using a checklist of 27 items for observational research. Information on study design, stroke severity and recovery, and assessments and outcome of V̇o₂peak and walking capacity, as well as the reported correlation coefficients, were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen studies involving 454 participants were included. Meta-analyses showed combined correlation coefficients (rɱ) for V̇o₂peak and walking speed and for V̇o₂peak and walking distance of .42 (95% credibility interval=.31, .54) and .52 (95% credibility interval=.42, .62), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The studies included in the present review had small sample sizes and low methodological quality. Clinical and methodological diversity challenged the comparability of the included studies, despite statistical homogeneity. Relevant data of 3 studies could not be retrieved. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the correlation of V̇o₂peak with walking speed was low and moderate for V̇o₂peak and walking distance, respectively, indicating that other factors, besides V̇o₂peak, determine walking capacity after stroke.
Authors: Pierce Boyne; Darcy Reisman; Michael Brian; Brian Barney; Ava Franke; Daniel Carl; Jane Khoury; Kari Dunning Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Susan Marzolini; Che-Yuan Wu; Rowaida Hussein; Lisa Y Xiong; Suban Kangatharan; Ardit Peni; Christopher R Cooper; Kylie S K Lau; Ghislaine Nzodjou Makhdoom; Maureen Pakosh; Stephanie A Zaban; Michelle M Nguyen; Mohammad Amin Banihashemi; Walter Swardfager Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Susan M Linder; Sara Davidson; Anson Rosenfeldt; John Lee; Mandy Miller Koop; Francois Bethoux; Jay L Alberts Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Marlen Yessirkepov; Alexander A Voronov; Vladimir I Trukhachev; Elena I Kostyukova; Alexey N Gerasimov; George D Kitas Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 2.153