BACKGROUND: Little is known about diet quality with a reduced-energy, low-fat, partial meal replacement plan, especially in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) trial implemented a partial meal replacement plan in the Intensive Lifestyle Intervention. OBJECTIVE: To compare dietary intake and percent meeting fat-related and food group dietary recommendations in Intensive Lifestyle Intervention and Diabetes Support and Education groups at 12 months. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial comparing Intensive Lifestyle Intervention with Diabetes Support and Education at 0 and 12 months. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: From 16 US sites, the first 50% of participants (aged 45 to 76 years, overweight or obese, with type 2 diabetes) were invited to complete dietary assessments. Complete 0- and 12-month dietary assessments (collected between 2001 and 2004) were available for 2,397 participants (46.6% of total participants), with 1,186 randomized to Diabetes Support and Education group and 1,211 randomized toIntensive Lifestyle Intervention group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A food frequency questionnaire assessed intake: energy; percent energy from protein, fat, carbohydrate, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and saturated fats; trans-fatty acids; cholesterol; fiber; weekly meal replacements; and daily servings from food groups from the Food Guide Pyramid. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Mixed-factor analyses of covariance, using Proc MIXED with a repeated statement, with age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and income controlled. Unadjusted χ² tests compared percent meeting fat-related and food group recommendations at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants had a significantly lower fat and cholesterol intake and greater fiber intake than Diabetes Support and Education participants. Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants consumed more servings per day of fruits; vegetables; and milk, yogurt, and cheese; and fewer servings per day of fats, oils, and sweets than Diabetes Support and Education participants. A greater percentage of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants than Diabetes Support and Education participants met fat-related and most food group recommendations. Within Intensive Lifestyle Intervention, a greater percentage of participants consuming two or more meal replacements per day than participants consuming less than one meal replacement per day met most fat-related and food group recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The partial meal replacement plan consumed by Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants was related to superior diet quality.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Little is known about diet quality with a reduced-energy, low-fat, partial meal replacement plan, especially in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) trial implemented a partial meal replacement plan in the Intensive Lifestyle Intervention. OBJECTIVE: To compare dietary intake and percent meeting fat-related and food group dietary recommendations in Intensive Lifestyle Intervention and Diabetes Support and Education groups at 12 months. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial comparing Intensive Lifestyle Intervention with Diabetes Support and Education at 0 and 12 months. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: From 16 US sites, the first 50% of participants (aged 45 to 76 years, overweight or obese, with type 2 diabetes) were invited to complete dietary assessments. Complete 0- and 12-month dietary assessments (collected between 2001 and 2004) were available for 2,397 participants (46.6% of total participants), with 1,186 randomized to Diabetes Support and Education group and 1,211 randomized to Intensive Lifestyle Intervention group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A food frequency questionnaire assessed intake: energy; percent energy from protein, fat, carbohydrate, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and saturated fats; trans-fatty acids; cholesterol; fiber; weekly meal replacements; and daily servings from food groups from the Food Guide Pyramid. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Mixed-factor analyses of covariance, using Proc MIXED with a repeated statement, with age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and income controlled. Unadjusted χ² tests compared percent meeting fat-related and food group recommendations at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants had a significantly lower fat and cholesterol intake and greater fiber intake than Diabetes Support and Education participants. Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants consumed more servings per day of fruits; vegetables; and milk, yogurt, and cheese; and fewer servings per day of fats, oils, and sweets than Diabetes Support and Education participants. A greater percentage of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants than Diabetes Support and Education participants met fat-related and most food group recommendations. Within Intensive Lifestyle Intervention, a greater percentage of participants consuming two or more meal replacements per day than participants consuming less than one meal replacement per day met most fat-related and food group recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The partial meal replacement plan consumed by Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants was related to superior diet quality.
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Delia Smith West; Linda Delahanty; John Jakicic; Jack Rejeski; Don Williamson; Robert I Berkowitz; David E Kelley; Christine Tomchee; James O Hill; Shiriki Kumanyika Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Karen C Sparks; Katherine Hirst; Tina Costacou; Jennifer C Lovejoy; Judith G Regensteiner; Mary A Hoskin; Andrea M Kriska; George A Bray Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Delia S West; Rebecca H Neiberg; Rena R Wing; Donna H Ryan; Karen C Johnson; John P Foreyt; James O Hill; Dace L Trence; Mara Z Vitolins Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Xavier Pi-Sunyer; George Blackburn; Frederick L Brancati; George A Bray; Renee Bright; Jeanne M Clark; Jeffrey M Curtis; Mark A Espeland; John P Foreyt; Kathryn Graves; Steven M Haffner; Barbara Harrison; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; John Jakicic; Robert W Jeffery; Karen C Johnson; Steven Kahn; David E Kelley; Abbas E Kitabchi; William C Knowler; Cora E Lewis; Barbara J Maschak-Carey; Brenda Montgomery; David M Nathan; Jennifer Patricio; Anne Peters; J Bruce Redmon; Rebecca S Reeves; Donna H Ryan; Monika Safford; Brent Van Dorsten; Thomas A Wadden; Lynne Wagenknecht; Jacqueline Wesche-Thobaben; Rena R Wing; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kathryn E Demos; Jeanne M McCaffery; J Graham Thomas; Kimberly A Mailloux; Todd A Hare; Rena R Wing Journal: Appetite Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Rima Itani Al-Nimr; K C S Wright; Christina L Aquila; Curtis L Petersen; Tyler L Gooding; John A Batsis Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN Date: 2020-09-19
Authors: Almudena Carneiro-Barrera; Francisco J Amaro-Gahete; Lucas Jurado-Fasoli; Germán Sáez-Roca; Carlos Martín-Carrasco; Francisco J Tinahones; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.706