Literature DB >> 25572813

Third-line chemotherapy with carboplatin, gemcitabine and liposomised doxorubicin for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Vinicius Araújo B de Lima1, Jens Benn Sørensen.   

Abstract

There is no well-defined standard third-line chemotherapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, combination of carboplatin, liposomised doxorubicin (Caelyx) and gemcitabine (CCG regimen) has revealed noteworthy activity when used as first-line treatment. The aim of this study is to assess efficacy and toxicity profile for patients with MPM receiving CCG regimen as a third-line treatment. Carboplatin (AUC 5), Caelyx (30 mg/m(2)) and Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) day 1, together with Gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) day 8, were given in up to six cycles. Patients were unresectable, PS 0-2, and had previously received a first-line platinum-based regimen and either vinorelbine or pemetrexed as second line. Response to treatment was assessed by CT scan using Modified RECIST criteria for mesothelioma. Forty-three patients were treated between 2010 and 2014. Median age was 67 years (47-82), 72 % males, and 79 % had previous asbestos exposure. Ninety per cent had PS 0-1, 58 % had epitheloid subtype and 63 % IMIG stage IV. First-line treatment was platinum and pemetrexed in 42 cases. Second-line treatment was vinorelbine in 42 cases and pemetrexed in one patient. Median lead time from cessation of second-line treatment to start of third CCG was 1 month. Twenty-eight per cent of the patients received six cycles, while treatment was postponed due to toxicities, mainly haematological, in 56 % of cases. No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Partial response (PR) occurred in 14 %, and disease control rate (DCR) was 60 %. Medians of overall survival (OS) from diagnosis and from start of CCG treatment were 25.2 months (18.4-31.5 months) and 6.8 months (5.4-8.4 months), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (1.7-4.5 months). Third-line CCG revealed a noteworthy efficacy with a DCR of 60.4 %. It was, however, associated with considerable haematological toxicity. Less toxic and more active treatment options are clearly needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572813     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0458-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  23 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Jens Benn Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with liposomized doxorubicine: prolonged time to progression and good survival. A Nordic study.

Authors:  Gunnar Hillerdal; Jens Benn Sorensen; Stein Sundström; Anders Vikström; Anders Hjerpe
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Multimodal management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: where are we today?

Authors:  Paul E Van Schil; Isabelle Opitz; Walter Weder; Christophe De Laet; Andreas Domen; Patrick Lauwers; Jeroen M Hendriks; Jan P Van Meerbeeck
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line or beyond treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma pretreated with platinum plus pemetrexed chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gouji Toyokawa; Mitsuhiro Takenoyama; Fumihiko Hirai; Ryo Toyozawa; Eiko Inamasu; Miyako Kojo; Yosuke Morodomi; Yoshimasa Shiraishi; Tomoyoshi Takenaka; Masafumi Yamaguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Takashi Seto; Yukito Ichinose
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The efficacy and safety of weekly vinorelbine in relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Justin Stebbing; Thomas Powles; Kirsty McPherson; Jonathan Shamash; Paula Wells; Michael T Sheaff; Sarah Slater; Robin M Rudd; Dean Fennell; Jeremy P C Steele
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Phase III trial of pemetrexed plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in previously treated patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Jacek Jassem; Rodryg Ramlau; Armando Santoro; Wolfgang Schuette; Assad Chemaissani; Shengyan Hong; Johannes Blatter; Susumu Adachi; Axel Hanauske; Christian Manegold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Liposomal doxorubicin: antitumor activity and unique toxicities during two complementary phase I studies.

Authors:  B Uziely; S Jeffers; R Isacson; K Kutsch; D Wei-Tsao; Z Yehoshua; E Libson; F M Muggia; A Gabizon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with carboplatin, liposomized doxorubicin, and gemcitabine: a phase II study.

Authors:  Gunnar Hillerdal; Jens Benn Sorensen; Stein Sundström; Henrik Riska; Anders Vikström; Anders Hjerpe
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Cisplatin and vinorelbine first-line chemotherapy in non-resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; H Frank; T Palshof
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: impact of surgery on survival and quality of life-relation to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and alternative therapies.

Authors:  Sotiris Papaspyros; Sayonara Papaspyros
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-02-03
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Medical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma relapses.

Authors:  Iacopo Petrini; Maurizio Lucchesi; Gianfranco Puppo; Antonio Chella
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Ex vivo evaluation of tumor cell specific drug responses in malignant pleural effusions.

Authors:  Carl-Olof Hillerdal; Rita Ötvös; Tünde Szatmári; Sulaf Abd Own; Gunnar Hillerdal; Åsa-Lena Dackland; Katalin Dobra; Anders Hjerpe
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.