Literature DB >> 7602367

Liposomal doxorubicin: antitumor activity and unique toxicities during two complementary phase I studies.

B Uziely1, S Jeffers, R Isacson, K Kutsch, D Wei-Tsao, Z Yehoshua, E Libson, F M Muggia, A Gabizon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of our studies was to define the maximal-tolerated dose of liposomal doxorubicin (DOX-SL; Liposome Technology Inc, Menlo Park, CA), a doxorubicin formulation of polyethyleneglycol-coated liposomes, characterize the toxicities associated with this formulation, and evaluate any indication of antitumor activity within a phase I setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two separate phase I studies were conducted following the initial human pharmacokinetic testing at one of the sites (Hadassah). The starting dose of 20 mg/m2 at the University of Southern California was just below the dose without toxicity in the pharmacokinetic study. At Hadassah, the phase I starting dose was just above their earlier safe single doses, 60 mg/m2. Both studies involved cohorts of at least three patients and redosing every 3 to 4 weeks. To determine the recommended dose for phase II trials, an additional level of 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was explored, and the level of 60 mg/m2 every 4 weeks was expanded.
RESULTS: A total of 56 patients receiving 281 courses of DOX-SL was accrued and evaluated for toxicity. Hand-foot (H-F) syndrome and stomatitis are the two main dose-limiting factors of DOX-SL. Stomatitis was dose-limiting for high single doses of DOX-SL greater than 70 mg/m2. Skin toxicity manifested primarily as H-F syndrome was dose-limiting for repetitive dosing, but acceptable at either 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 60 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Attenuation of acute subjective symptoms and lack of alopecia were generally observed. Patients with carcinomas of the breast, ovary, prostate, and head and neck were among those showing objective antitumor responses or improvement based, in part, on blood levels of tumor markers.
CONCLUSION: The toxicity profile of DOX-SL differs prominently from that of the free drug administered by bolus or rapid infusion and with some differences, resembles that of prolonged continuous infusion. This finding, as well as the antitumor activity observed, supports wide phase II testing of DOX-SL in solid tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7602367     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  79 in total

1.  Phase II study of intravenous Doxil in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Y Oh; R Perez-Soler; F V Fossella; B S Glisson; J Kurie; G L Walsh; M Truong; D M Shin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Breast cancer therapies in development. A review of their pharmacology and clinical potential.

Authors:  D de Valeriola; A Awada; J A Roy; A Di Leo; L Biganzoli; M Piccart
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Approaching the asymptote: obstacles and opportunities for nanomedicine in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sascha N Goonewardena
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Pharmacogenomics in pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Steven W Paugh; Gabriele Stocco; William E Evans
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 5.  Drug targeting with nano-sized carrier systems.

Authors:  Masayuki Yokoyama
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Translational studies of phenotypic probes for the mononuclear phagocyte system and liposomal pharmacology.

Authors:  Whitney P Caron; John C Lay; Alan M Fong; Ninh M La-Beck; Parag Kumar; Suzanne E Newman; Haibo Zhou; Jane H Monaco; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Wendy R Brewster; Linda Van Le; Victoria L Bae-Jump; Paola A Gehrig; William C Zamboni
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  Alberto Gabizon; Hilary Shmeeda; Yechezkel Barenholz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Liposomal drug formulations. Rationale for development and what we can expect for the future.

Authors:  T M Allen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert Strother; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  A randomized phase II study of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer patients: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Helena Linardou; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Christos Papadimitriou; Aristotelis Bamias; George Fountzilas; Haralabos P Kalofonos; Paris Kosmidis; Eleni Timotheadou; Thomas Makatsoris; Epaminondas Samantas; Evangelos Briasoulis; Christos Christodoulou; Pavlos Papakostas; Dimitrios Pectasides; Athanasios M Dimopoulos
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.