Literature DB >> 25572689

Determination of breath acetone in 149 type 2 diabetic patients using a ringdown breath-acetone analyzer.

Meixiu Sun1, Zhuying Chen, Zhiyong Gong, Xiaomeng Zhao, Chenyu Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Zhennang Wang, Yingxin Li, Chuji Wang.   

Abstract

Over 90% of diabetic patients have Type 2 diabetes. Although an elevated mean breath acetone concentration has been found to exist in Type 1 diabetes (T1D), information on breath acetone in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has yet to be obtained. In this study, we first used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to validate a ringdown breath-acetone analyzer based on the cavity-ringdown-spectroscopy technique, through comparing breath acetone concentrations in the range 0.5-2.5 ppm measured using both methods. The linear fitting of R = 0.99 suggests that the acetone concentrations obtained using both methods are consistent with a largest standard deviation of ±0.4 ppm in the lowest concentration of the range. Next, 620 breath samples from 149 T2D patients and 42 healthy subjects were collected and tested using the breath analyzer. Four breath samples were taken from each subject under each of four different conditions: fasting, 2 h post-breakfast, 2 h post-lunch, and 2 h post-dinner. Simultaneous blood glucose levels were also measured using a standard diabetic-management blood-glucose meter. For the 149 T2D subjects, their exhaled breath acetone concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 19.8 ppm; four different ranges of breath acetone concentration, 0.1-19.8, 0.1-7.1, 0.1-6.3, and 0.1-9.5 ppm, were obtained for the subjects under the four different conditions, respectively. For the 42 healthy subjects, their breath acetone concentration ranged from 0.1 to 2.6 ppm; four different ranges of breath acetone concentration, 0.3-2.6, 0.1-2.6, 0.1-1.7, and 0.3-1.6 ppm, were obtained for the four different conditions. The mean breath acetone concentration of the 149 T2D subjects was determined to be 1.5 ± 1.5 ppm, which was 1.5 times that of 1.0 ± 0.6 ppm for the 42 healthy subjects. No correlation was found between the breath acetone concentration and the blood glucose level of the T2D subjects and the healthy volunteers. This study using a relatively large number of subjects provides new data regarding breath acetone in diabetes (T1D and T2D) and suggests that an elevated mean breath acetone concentration also exists in T2D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572689     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8401-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of volatile organic compounds from deep airway in the lung through intubation sampling.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jin Zhang; Houwen Ding; Yueting Ding; Xue Zou; Min Yang; Qiang Zhou; Zhou Liu; Ling Zheng; Heping Zuo; Dianlong Ge; Qiangling Zhang; Chaoqun Huang; Chengyin Shen; Yannan Chu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.478

2.  A colorimetric nanoprobe based on dynamic aggregation of SDS-capped silver nanoparticles for tobramycin determination in exhaled breath condensate.

Authors:  Homa Rezaei; Elaheh Rahimpour; Maryam Khoubnasabjafari; Vahid Jouyban-Gharamaleki; Abolghasem Jouyban
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.833

3.  A Portable Real-Time Ringdown Breath Acetone Analyzer: Toward Potential Diabetic Screening and Management.

Authors:  Chenyu Jiang; Meixiu Sun; Zhennan Wang; Zhuying Chen; Xiaomeng Zhao; Yuan Yuan; Yingxin Li; Chuji Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Elevated exhaled acetone concentration in stage C heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Tetsuro Yokokawa; Takamasa Sato; Satoshi Suzuki; Masayoshi Oikawa; Akiomi Yoshihisa; Atsushi Kobayashi; Takayoshi Yamaki; Hiroyuki Kunii; Kazuhiko Nakazato; Hitoshi Suzuki; Shu-Ichi Saitoh; Takafumi Ishida; Akito Shimouchi; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Review of Non-invasive Glucose Sensing Techniques: Optical, Electrical and Breath Acetone.

Authors:  Maryamsadat Shokrekhodaei; Stella Quinones
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Monitoring Technology: A Review.

Authors:  Liu Tang; Shwu Jen Chang; Ching-Jung Chen; Jen-Tsai Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Hyphenated Mass Spectrometry versus Real-Time Mass Spectrometry Techniques for the Detection of Volatile Compounds from the Human Body.

Authors:  Oliver Gould; Natalia Drabińska; Norman Ratcliffe; Ben de Lacy Costello
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Measuring breath acetone for monitoring fat loss: Review.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Developing GLAD Parameters to Control the Deposition of Nanostructured Thin Film.

Authors:  Jakub Bronicki; Dominik Grochala; Artur Rydosz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Commercial and Scientific Solutions for Blood Glucose Monitoring-A Review.

Authors:  Yirui Xue; Angelika S Thalmayer; Samuel Zeising; Georg Fischer; Maximilian Lübke
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.