Literature DB >> 25569009

Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance.

Warner K Huh1, Kevin A Ault, David Chelmow, Diane D Davey, Robert A Goulart, Francisco A R Garcia, Walter K Kinney, L Stewart Massad, Edward J Mayeaux, Debbie Saslow, Mark Schiffman, Nicolas Wentzensen, Herschel W Lawson, Mark H Einstein.   

Abstract

In 2011, the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology updated screening guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. Recommended screening strategies were cytology or cotesting (cytology in combination with high-risk human papillomavirus [hrHPV] testing). These guidelines also addressed the use of hrHPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, which was not recommended for use at that time. There is now a growing body of evidence for screening with primary hrHPV testing, including a prospective U.S.-based registration study. Thirteen experts, including representatives from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Cytopathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, convened to provide interim guidance for primary hrHPV screening. This guidance panel was specifically triggered by an application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a currently marketed HPV test to be labeled for the additional indication of primary cervical cancer screening. Guidance was based on literature review and review of data from the FDA registration study, supplemented by expert opinion. This document aims to provide information for health care providers who are interested in primary hrHPV testing and an overview of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this strategy for screening as well as to highlight areas in need of further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25569009     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  56 in total

1.  HPV16 viral load and physical state measurement as a potential immediate triage strategy for HR-HPV-infected women: a study in 644 women with single HPV16 infections.

Authors:  Anna Manawapat-Klopfer; Lisa Wang; Juliane Haedicke-Jarboui; Frank Stubenrauch; Christian Munk; Louise T Thomsen; Peter Martus; Susanne K Kjaer; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Automated Cervical Screening and Triage, Based on HPV Testing and Computer-Interpreted Cytology.

Authors:  Kai Yu; Noorie Hyun; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Han Zhang; Robin E Stamps; Nancy E Poitras; William Wheeler; Brian Befano; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Human papillomavirus molecular biology.

Authors:  Mallory E Harden; Karl Munger
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.657

5.  Uptake of HPV testing and extended cervical cancer screening intervals following cytology alone and Pap/HPV cotesting in women aged 30-65 years.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Anne F Rositch; Darcy F Phelan-Emrick; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  A study of HPV typing for the management of HPV-positive ASC-US cervical cytologic results.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Laurence M Vaughan; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Philip E Castle; Hormuzd A Katki; Julia C Gage; Barbara Fetterman; Brian Befano; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Point-Counterpoint: Cervical Cancer Screening Should Be Done by Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing with Genotyping and Reflex Cytology for Women over the Age of 25 Years.

Authors:  Mark H Stoler; R Marshall Austin; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Proof-of-principle study of a novel cervical screening and triage strategy: Computer-analyzed cytology to decide which HPV-positive women are likely to have ≥CIN2.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Kai Yu; Rosemary Zuna; S Terence Dunn; Han Zhang; Joan Walker; Michael Gold; Noorie Hyun; Greg Rydzak; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  HPV-FASTER: broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Claudia Robles; Mireia Díaz; Marc Arbyn; Iacopo Baussano; Christine Clavel; Guglielmo Ronco; Joakim Dillner; Matti Lehtinen; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Mario Poljak; Susanne K Kjaer; Chris J L M Meijer; Suzanne M Garland; Jorge Salmerón; Xavier Castellsagué; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  HPV Update: Vaccination, Screening, and Associated Disease.

Authors:  Megan McNamara; Pelin Batur; Judith M E Walsh; Kay M Johnson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.