Literature DB >> 25568992

Fetal sex chromosome testing by maternal plasma DNA sequencing: clinical laboratory experience and biology.

Diana W Bianchi1, Saba Parsa, Sucheta Bhatt, Meredith Halks-Miller, Kathryn Kurtzman, Amy J Sehnert, Amy Swanson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical experience with noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal sex chromosomes using sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA in a commercial laboratory.
METHODS: A noninvasive prenatal testing laboratory data set was examined for samples in which fetal sex chromosomes were reported. Available clinical outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: Of 18,161 samples with sex chromosome results, no sex chromosome aneuploidy was detected in 98.9% and the fetal sex was reported as XY (9,236) or XX (8,721). In 4 of 32 cases in which the fetal sex was reportedly discordant between noninvasive prenatal testing and karyotype or ultrasonogram, a potential biological reason for the discordance exists, including two cases of documented co-twin demise, one case of a maternal kidney transplant from a male donor, and one case of fetal ambiguous genitalia. In the remaining 204 samples (1.1%), one of four sex chromosome aneuploidies (monosomy X, XXX, XXY, or XYY) was detected. The frequency of false positive results for sex chromosome aneuploidies is a minimum of 0.26% and a maximum of 1.05%. All but one of the discordant sex chromosome aneuploidy results involved the X chromosome. In two putative false-positive XXX cases, maternal XXX was confirmed by karyotype. For the false-positive cases, mean maternal age was significantly higher in monosomy X (P<.001) and lower in XXX (P=.008).
CONCLUSION: Noninvasive prenatal testing results for sex chromosome aneuploidy can be confounded by maternal or fetal biological phenomena. When a discordant noninvasive prenatal testing result is encountered, resolution requires additional maternal history, detailed fetal ultrasonography, and determination of fetal and possibly maternal karyotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25568992     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  31 in total

1.  Pregnancy: Prepare for unexpected prenatal test results.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Non-invasive Prenatal Testing Using Fetal DNA.

Authors:  Giulia Breveglieri; Elisabetta D'Aversa; Alessia Finotti; Monica Borgatti
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 3.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 4.  Calculation of Fetal Fraction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Matthew Cserhati
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-09

Review 5.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

6.  Biological explanations for discordant noninvasive prenatal test results: Preliminary data and lessons learned.

Authors:  Louise Wilkins-Haug; Chengsheng Zhang; Eliza Cerveira; Mallory Ryan; Adam Mil-Homens; Qihui Zhu; Honey Reddi; Charles Lee; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results: a clinical laboratory practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Athena M Cherry; Yassmine M Akkari; Kimberly M Barr; Hutton M Kearney; Nancy C Rose; Sarah T South; James H Tepperberg; Jeanne M Meck
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Recent omics technologies and their emerging applications for personalised medicine.

Authors:  Dong-Hyuk Kim; Young-Sook Kim; Nam-Il Son; Chan-Koo Kang; Ah-Ram Kim
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.615

9.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Anthony R Gregg; Brian G Skotko; Judith L Benkendorf; Kristin G Monaghan; Komal Bajaj; Robert G Best; Susan Klugman; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Inherited unbalanced reciprocal translocation with 3q duplication and 5p deletion in a foetus revealed by cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) testing: a case report.

Authors:  Taccyanna M Ali; Emilia Mateu-Brull; Nuria Balaguer; Camila Dantas; Haline Risso Borges; Mariana Quintans Guerra de Oliveira; Lorena Rodrigo; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Roser Navarro; Miguel Milán
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.