| Literature DB >> 25568673 |
Victor Masekaven Ahur1, Yahaya Adenkola Adenkola1, Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan1, Job Terungwa Ikye-Tor2.
Abstract
In vitro antioxidant and erythrocyte protecting activities by aqueous extract of Ficus thonningii leaves on blood cells were studied in acetaminophen treated rats. The extract was safe at limit dose of 5000 mg kg(-1) body weight. The extract demonstrated dose dependent antihemolytic effect at dose levels between 50 and 200 mg kg(-1) body weight. The lowest antihemolytic effect was observed at dose level of 200 mg kg(-1) body given the lowest percentage hemolysis of 10.53 ± 1.76%, whereas the highest percentage hemolysis at dose level of 50 mg kg(-1) was 29.02 ± 7.45%. Hematology revealed erythrocytosis at dose levels of 100 and 200 mg kg(-1) body weight. Hyperglobinemia and lymphocytopenia were observed at dose levels of 100 mg kg(-1) and 200 mg kg(-1), respectively. The extract effectively showed scavenging activity on a stable oxidative radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and a significant ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) activity. The plausible erythrocyte membrane protective effect may be due to its free radical scavenging activity and hence the extract can be used to improve hematological parameters and ameliorate oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: Acetaminophen; Erythrocytes; Ficus thonningii; Osmotic fragility
Year: 2013 PMID: 25568673 PMCID: PMC4279623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res Forum ISSN: 2008-8140 Impact factor: 1.054
Fig. 1Effect of AQFT on erythrocyte osmotic fragility in acetaminophen-treated rats; († values are significantly different compared to normal and acetaminophen control groups, p < 0.05).
Effects of AQFT leaves on hematological parameters of acetaminophen-treated rats. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, (n = 6).
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12.52 ± 0.29 | 12.23 ± 0.19 | 12.65 ± 0.33 | 13.23 ± 0.38 | 12.65 ± 0.43 | |
|
| 42.22 ± 1.00 | 41.35 ± 0.86 | 41.32 ± 1.27 | 44.15 ± 1.35 | 42.05 ± 1.42 | |
|
| 63.58 ± 1.23 | 62.73 ± 0.86 | 59.70 ± 0.47 | 61.25 ± 0.91 | 58.75 ± 0.95 | |
|
| 18.85 ± 0.25 | 18.57 ± 0.24 | 18.30 ± 0.17 | 18.38 ± 0.24 | 17.65 ± 0.18 | |
|
| 29.68 ± 0.38 | 29.60 ± 0.24 | 30.65 ± 0.32 | 29.97 ± 0.11 | 30.08 ± 0.32 | |
|
| 6.65 ± 0.18 | 6.60 ± 0.14 | 6.92 ± 0.22 | 7.20 ± 0.15 | 7.16 ± 0.23 | |
|
| 11.53 ± 1.20 | 7.12 ± 0.53 | 8.08 ± 1.08 | 11.53 ± 0.35 | 10.10 ± 1.13 | |
|
| 30.17 ± 3.17 | 35.33 ± 5.02 | 35.67 ± 4.53 | 29.83 ± 3.81 | 35.33 ± 3.67 | |
|
| 62.50 ± 3.84 | 59.67 ± 4.29 | 60.50 ± 4.88 | 64.33 ± 4.39 | 63.50 ± 2.32 | |
Values with different alphabet superscripts on the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Fig. 2Antioxidant activity of AQFT as compared with ascorbic acid using DPPH method.
Fig. 3Ferric reducing antioxidant power of AQFT compared with ascorbic acid; (* values are significantly different compared to the reference drug ascorbic acid, p < 0.05).