Literature DB >> 25568466

Gynaecology - Quo vadis? Situation Analysis, National and International Perspectives.

S Y Brucker1, E Simoes2, D Wallwiener3.   

Abstract

In a large and heavily networked specialty like gynaecology it is a particular challenge with regard to future status to achieve excellent patient care, research and teaching. At the same time not only hospitals but also research facilities are experiencing increasing pressure from performance and competition sides in terms of survival and further development on the clinical, scientific and economic fronts. The numerous changes, including paradigm shifts, in medicine, society, the health-care system and scientific innovations present new challenges to the specialty. This leads to questions about priority, problem areas and weaknesses as well as to new opportunities for the field and the overall question if it will be possible to meet the paradigm shifts and problems by the creation of new structures. In the light of the need for and the potential of design measures, this article presents a SWOT analysis of the specialty's situation as a whole and in particular for gynaecology in German universities. One sees additional demands that add up to an expansion of the tasks. At the same time the shortage of new recruits becomes apparent. A broadening of the perspectives on women's health and individualised medicine come into focus. Partial solutions include new supporting structures, capacity measurements as well as even structural options. In particular, the department structure, that is common abroad, opens an opportunity for specialisation while maintaining unity for a broader further training and strengthened research. Chances and strengths of the specialty are especially effective in coordinated and concerted activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  department; gynaecology; health-care structures; womenʼs health

Year:  2014        PMID: 25568466      PMCID: PMC4275314          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  10 in total

1.  Drug-related information generates placebo and nocebo responses that modify the drug response.

Authors:  M A Flaten; T Simonsen; H Olsen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  [The structurizing effect of minimum quantitative requirements for inpatient care].

Authors:  E Simoes; S Bauer; P Schwoerer; F W Schmahl
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2005-02

3.  [Critical appraisal of articles about clinical audit].

Authors:  Zsolt Mogyorósy; Gábor Mogyorósy
Journal:  Orv Hetil       Date:  2007-05-27       Impact factor: 0.540

4.  Common competencies for all healthcare managers: the Healthcare Leadership Alliance model.

Authors:  Mary E Stefl
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

5.  Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Janet Tucker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Shaping the System - The DRG Evaluation Project of the German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG).

Authors:  W Fiori; S P Renner; K Siam; J Babapirali; N Roeder; E Dausch; T Hildebrandt; P Hillemanns; M Nehmzow; M Zygmunt; D Piroth; C Schem; T Schwenzer; K Friese; D Wallwiener; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Assessment of University Gynaecology Clinics Based on Quality Reports.

Authors:  E F Solomayer; A Rody; D Wallwiener; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Health Literacy Requires Empowerment - Results of an Analysis of Patient Needs and the Demand for Qualification over a 10-Year Period.

Authors:  E Simoes; D Wallwiener; H Kusicka; S Brucker
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  [Plea for a strengthening of clinical social medicine].

Authors:  E Simoes; J G Gostomzyk; F W Schmahl; M Bamberg; S Y Brucker; D Wallwiener
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2014-09-10

10.  University Gynaecology and Obstetrics, quo vadis? A Department of Women's Health-University Women's Hospital of the future?

Authors:  Elisabeth Simoes; Sara Y Brucker; Bernhard Krämer; Diethelm Wallwiener
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.