Literature DB >> 2556817

Cytomegalovirus antigenemia as a useful marker of symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation--a report of 130 consecutive patients.

A P van den Berg1, W van der Bij, W J van Son, J Anema, M van der Giessen, J Schirm, A M Tegzess, T H The.   

Abstract

In earlier work we demonstrated that CMV immediate early antigens can be detected in peripheral blood leukocytes of patients with active CMV infection. We now report a comparison of the antigenemia assay and an anti-CMV ELISA in a prospective longitudinal study of 130 renal transplant recipients who were monitored for active CMV infection during the first 3 months after transplantation. Active CMV infection developed in 56 patients. The antigenemia assay had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 93% in the diagnosis of active CMV infection; for the ELISA these figures were 95 and 100%, respectively. In 22 of the 56 patients a CMV syndrome occurred. Antigenemia was demonstrated in all 22 patients while an antibody response occurred in 21 of them. The antigenemia assay became positive 8 +/- 7 days before the onset of symptoms while the antibody response was observed 4 +/- 9 days after the onset of symptoms. The pattern of antigenemia was helpful for monitoring the course of the infection. The maximum level of antigenemia was significantly higher and its duration significantly longer in symptomatic than asymptomatic infection. We conclude that CMV antigenemia is a sensitive, specific, and early marker of CMV infection. The antigenemia assay is of great value in monitoring patients with a high risk of CMV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2556817     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198912000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  34 in total

1.  Use of molecular assays in diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus disease following renal transplantation.

Authors:  C Aitken; W Barrett-Muir; C Millar; K Templeton; J Thomas; F Sheridan; D Jeffries; M Yaqoob; J Breuer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors:  M van der Giessen; T H The; W J van Son
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Cytomegalovirus detection in transplant patients: comparison of different methods in a prospective survey.

Authors:  W Wunderli; J D Auracher; R Zbinden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Prospective study of cytomegalovirus antigenemia in allograft recipients.

Authors:  H Miller; E Rossier; R Milk; C Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Cytomegalovirus reactivation exacerbated thrombocytopenia and haemolysis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Toshiro Sugimoto; Masahiro Aoyama; Naoko Takeda; Masayoshi Sakaguchi; Yoshihiko Nishio; Takashi Uzu; Atsunori Kashiwagi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  The role of the cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay in the detection and prevention of cytomegalovirus syndrome and disease in solid organ transplant recipients: A review of the British Columbia experience.

Authors:  Erica D Greanya; Nilufar Partovi; Eric M Yoshida; R Jean Shapiro; Robert D Levy; Chris H Sherlock; Gwen M Stephens
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Cytomegalovirus-specific antibodies to an immediate early antigen and a late membrane antigen and their possible role in controlling secondary cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  J van Zanten; M van der Giessen; L H van der Voort; W J van Son; W van der Bij; T H The
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Rapid cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay by direct erythrocyte lysis and immunofluorescence staining.

Authors:  S K Ho; C Y Lo; I K Cheng; T M Chan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Minimal effect of delayed sample processing on results of quantitative PCR for cytomegalovirus DNA in leukocytes compared to results of an antigenemia assay.

Authors:  P Schäfer; W Tenschert; K Gutensohn; R Laufs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Use of laboratory assays to predict cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Y Tong; L Cuevas; H Williams; A Bakran
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.