INTRODUCTION: Smokers switching completely from combustible cigarettes to electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are likely to reduce health risk, suggesting that e-cigarettes should be made appealing to adult smokers. However, uptake of e-cigarettes by nonsmoking teens would add risk without benefit and should be avoided. Although e-cigarette flavors may appeal to adult smokers, the concern is that flavors might attract nonsmoking teens. METHODS: Nonsmoking teens (n = 216, ages 13-17, no tobacco in past 6 months) and adult smokers (n = 432, ages 19-80, smoking 3+ years; could have used e-cigarettes) were recruited from an Internet research panel. In assessments completed online (May 22, 2014 to June 13, 2014), participants indicated their interest (0-10 scale) in e-cigarettes paired with various flavor descriptors. These were mixed (order balanced) with similar flavor offerings for ice cream and bottled water to mask the focus on e-cigarettes and validate the assessment. Mixed models contrasted interest between teens and adults and among adults by e-cigarette history. RESULTS: Nonsmoking teens' interest in e-cigarettes was very low (mean = 0.41 ± 0.14 [SE] on 0-10 scale). Adult smokers' interest (1.73 ± 0.10), while modest, was significantly higher overall (p < .0001) and for each flavor (most p values < .0001). Teen interest did not vary by flavor (p = .75), but adult interest did (p < .0001). Past-30-day adult e-cigarette users had the greatest interest in e-cigarettes, and their interest was most affected by flavor. Adults who never tried e-cigarettes had the lowest interest, yet still higher than nonsmoking teens' interest (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: The e-cigarette flavors tested appealed more to adult smokers than to nonsmoking teens, but interest in flavors was low for both groups.
INTRODUCTION: Smokers switching completely from combustible cigarettes to electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are likely to reduce health risk, suggesting that e-cigarettes should be made appealing to adult smokers. However, uptake of e-cigarettes by nonsmoking teens would add risk without benefit and should be avoided. Although e-cigarette flavors may appeal to adult smokers, the concern is that flavors might attract nonsmoking teens. METHODS: Nonsmoking teens (n = 216, ages 13-17, no tobacco in past 6 months) and adult smokers (n = 432, ages 19-80, smoking 3+ years; could have used e-cigarettes) were recruited from an Internet research panel. In assessments completed online (May 22, 2014 to June 13, 2014), participants indicated their interest (0-10 scale) in e-cigarettes paired with various flavor descriptors. These were mixed (order balanced) with similar flavor offerings for ice cream and bottled water to mask the focus on e-cigarettes and validate the assessment. Mixed models contrasted interest between teens and adults and among adults by e-cigarette history. RESULTS: Nonsmoking teens' interest in e-cigarettes was very low (mean = 0.41 ± 0.14 [SE] on 0-10 scale). Adult smokers' interest (1.73 ± 0.10), while modest, was significantly higher overall (p < .0001) and for each flavor (most p values < .0001). Teen interest did not vary by flavor (p = .75), but adult interest did (p < .0001). Past-30-day adult e-cigarette users had the greatest interest in e-cigarettes, and their interest was most affected by flavor. Adults who never tried e-cigarettes had the lowest interest, yet still higher than nonsmoking teens' interest (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: The e-cigarette flavors tested appealed more to adult smokers than to nonsmoking teens, but interest in flavors was low for both groups.
Authors: Gideon St Helen; Delia A Dempsey; Christopher M Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Krysten W Bold; Grace Kong; Deepa R Camenga; Patricia Simon; Asti Jackson; Dana A Cavallo; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Natalie Voos; Danielle Smith; Lisa Kaiser; Martin C Mahoney; Clara M Bradizza; Lynn T Kozlowski; Neal L Benowitz; Richard J O'Connor; Maciej L Goniewicz Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kristin Ashford; Emily Rayens; Amanda T Wiggins; Mary Kay Rayens; Amanda Fallin; Molly Malany Sayre Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: Michèle G Bonhomme; Enver Holder-Hayes; Bridget K Ambrose; Cindy Tworek; Shari P Feirman; Brian A King; Benjamin J Apelberg Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Amanda L Johnson; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Bridget K Ambrose; Kevin Conway; K Michael Cummings; Cassandra A Stanton; Cristine Delnevo; Olivia A Wackowski; Kathryn C Edwards; Shari P Feirman; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jennifer Bernat; Enver Holder-Hayes; Victoria Green; Marushka L Silveira; Yitong Zhou; Haneen Abudayyeh; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-09-21 Impact factor: 7.552