| Literature DB >> 25566207 |
Xiaoyun Yang1, Wuling Liu1, Yiyun Liu1, Jing Wang1, Luchao Lv1, Xiaojie Chen1, Dandan He1, Tong Yang1, Jianxia Hou1, Yinjuan Tan1, Li Xing1, Zhenling Zeng1, Jian-Hua Liu1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the occurrence of fosfomycin-resistant Escherichia coli from chickens and to characterize the plasmids carrying fosA3. A total of 661 E. coli isolates of chicken origin collected from 2009 to 2011 were screened for plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance determinants by PCR. Plasmids were characterized using PCR-based replicon typing, plasmid multilocus sequence typing, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Associated addiction systems and resistance genes were identified by PCR. PCR-mapping was used for analysis of the genetic context of fosA3. Fosfomycin resistance was detected in 58 isolates that also carried the fosA3 gene. Fifty-seven, 17, and 52 FosA3-producers also harbored bla CTX-M, rmtB, and floR genes, respectively. Most of the 58 fosA3-carrying isolates were clonally unrelated, and all fosA3 genes were located on plasmids belonged to F33:A-:B- (n = 18), IncN-F33:A-:B- (n = 7), IncHI2/ST3 (n = 10), IncI1/ST71 (n = 3), IncI1/ST108 (n = 3), and others. The genetic structures, IS26-ISEcp1-bla CTX-M-55-orf477-bla TEM-1-IS26-fosA3-1758bp-IS26 and ISEcp1-bla CTX-M-65-IS903-iroN-IS26-fosA3-536bp-IS26 were located on highly similar F33:A-:B- plasmids. In addition, bla CTX-M-14-fosA3-IS26 was frequently present on similar IncHI2/ST3 plasmids. IncFII plasmids had a significantly higher frequency of addiction systems (mean 3.5) than other plasmids. Our results showed a surprisingly high prevalence of fosA3 gene in E. coli isolates recovered from chicken in China. The spread of fosA3 can be attributed to horizontal dissemination of several epidemic plasmids, especially F33:A-:B- plasmids. Since coselection by other antimicrobials is the major driving force for the diffusion of the fosA3 gene, a strict antibiotic use policy is urgently needed in China.Entities:
Keywords: CTX-M; Escherichia coli; animal reservoirs; fosfomycin; plasmids; poultry
Year: 2014 PMID: 25566207 PMCID: PMC4267423 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Characterization of .
| F1 | 2011.6 | 1 | ST4472 | AMK, | |
| F1 | 2011.6 | 2 | ST48 | ||
| F1 | 2011.6 | 3 | ST533 | ||
| AHC16 | F2 | 2011.6 | 3 | ST533 | |
| AHC19 | F4 | 2011.6 | 3 | ST533 | |
| F1 | 2011.6 | 4 | ST746 | ||
| F2 | 2011.6 | 5 | ST4483 | ||
| F3 | 2011.6 | 6 | ST4447 | ||
| F5 | 2011.6 | 7 | ST2607 | ||
| F5 | 2011.6 | 8 | ST155 | ||
| F6 | 2011.6 | 9 | ST23 | ||
| F6 | 2011.6 | 10 | ST2179 | ||
| F6 | 2011.6 | 11 | ST226 | ||
| F7 | 2011.6 | 12 | ST101 | ||
| F9 | 2011.7 | 13 | ST57 | ||
| F9 | 2011.7 | 14 | ST206 | ||
| F8 | 2011.7 | 15 | ST4466 | AMK, | |
| F9 | 2011.7 | 16 | ST155 | AMK, | |
| F9 | 2011.7 | 17 | ST162 | ||
| F10 | 2011.7 | 18 | ST10 | AMK, | |
| F11 | 2011.7 | 19 | ST48 | ||
| F12 | 2011.7 | 20 | ST48 | ||
| F12 | 2011.7 | 21 | ST2223 | ||
| AHC69 | F13 | 2011.7 | 22 | ST2847 | |
| AHC72 | F13 | 2011.7 | 23 | ST2847 | |
| AHC80 | F14 | 2011.7 | 24 | ST155 | |
| F15 | 2010.8 | 25 | ST156 | ||
| F16 | 2010.8 | 26 | ST744 | ||
| F18 | 2010.8 | 27b | ST2496 | ||
| F17 | 2010.8 | 27a | ST4460 | ||
| F17 | 2010.8 | 28 | ST746 | ||
| F28 | 2010.9 | 29 | ST48 | AMK, | |
| F19 | 2010.8 | 30a | ST359 | ||
| F23 | 2010.8 | 30b | ST4461 | ||
| F20 | 2010.8 | 31 | ST4473 | ||
| F21 | 2010.8 | 32 | ST4465 | ||
| F21 | 2010.8 | 33 | ST4474 | AMK, CTX, GEN, CIP, FFC, TET | |
| F21 | 2010.8 | 34 | ST1518 | ||
| F15 | 2010.8 | 35 | ST4477 | ||
| F22 | 2010.8 | 36 | ST4459 | ||
| F24 | 2009.7 | 37 | ST2847 | ||
| F25 | 2009.7 | 38 | ST4360 | ||
| F31 | 2009.7 | 39 | ST4464 | ||
| F31 | 2009.7 | 40 | ST779 | ||
| F35 | 2009.6 | 41 | ST48 | ||
| SDC10 | F32 | 2009.6 | 42 | ST4498 | |
| SDC12 | F32 | 2009.6 | 43 | ST4497 | |
| F33 | 2009.5 | 44 | ST602 | ||
| F34 | 2009.5 | 45 | ST4462 | ||
| F34 | 2009.6 | 46 | ST602 | ||
| SDC15 | F36 | 2009.5 | 47 | ST219 | |
| F27 | 2011.3 | 48 | ST1589 | ||
| F28 | 2010.9 | 49 | ST453 | ||
| F29 | 2010.8 | 50 | ST354 | ||
| F29 | 2010.8 | 51 | ST48 | ||
| F28 | 2010.9 | 52 | ST93 | ||
| F30 | 2010.9 | smeared | ST156 | ||
| F37 | 2009.5 | smeared | ST398 |
Different provinces are indicated as follows: AH, Anhui; GD, Guangdong; GX, Guangxi; HN, Henan; SD, Shandong. Isolates from which the fosA3 gene can be transferred to the recipient by conjugation are underlined. Healthy animals are indicated by an asterisk.
F1 to F36, farm 1 to farm 36, respectively.
PFGE types (1, 2, 3, etc.) were assigned by visual inspection of the macrorestriction profile. Patterns that differed by fewer than six bands were considered to represent subtypes within the main group (30a, 30b, etc.). NT, nontypeable.
AMK, amikacin; CTX, cefotaxime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FFC, florfenicol; GEN, gentamicin; TET, tetracycline. The antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted according to breakpoint of CLSI (M100-S23), except that florfenicol (≥32 μg/mL) was interpreted according to breakpoint of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). All isolates were susceptible to colistin, imipenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tigecycline. Resistance phenotypes transferred to the recipient by conjugation ortransformationare underlined.
Characterization of some plasmids carrying .
| GDC24, GDC58, AHC18, SDC13, GDC40, GDC47, GDC1-4, GDC114, SDC04 | I | ~75 | F33:A-:B- | A1 | ||
| AHC33, GDC240 | III | ~75 | F33:A-:B- | A1 | ||
| AHC17, AHC26 | I | ~100 | N-F33:A-:B- | A2 | ||
| AHC24 | I | ~110 | N-F33:A-:B- | A3 | ||
| GDC54 | III | ~75 | F33:A-:B- | A4 | ||
| AHC23 | III | ~80 | F33:A-:B- | A5 | ||
| GDC46 | III | ~75 | F33:A-:B- | A6 | ||
| SDC01 | I | ~100 | N-F33:A-:B- | A7 | ||
| AHC76 | I | ~75 | F33:A-:B- | A8 | ||
| HNC02 | III | ~80 | F33:A-:B- | A9 | ||
| AHC52 | I | ~110 | N-F33:A-:B- | A10 | ||
| GDC17 | I | ~95 | N-F33:A-:B- | B | ||
| AHC9 | I | ~65 | N-F33:A-:B- | C | ||
| AHC69, AHC72 | I | ~75 | F33:A-:B- | ND | ||
| AHC27 | I | ~115 | I1/ST71 | D1 | ||
| GDC27 | I | ~125 | I1/ST71 | D2 | ||
| AHC30 | I | ~105 | I1/ST136 | D3 | ||
| GXC19 | II | ~125 | I1/ST71 | D4 | ||
| AHC54 | I | ~110 | I1/ST108 | D5 | ||
| AHC14 | I | ~115 | I1/ST108 | D6 | ||
| AHC55 | I | ~110 | I1/ST108 | D7 | ||
| SDC11 | V | ~100 | I1/ST136 | D8 | ||
| AHC60 | Unknown | ~120 | I1 | E | ||
| AHC66, AHC67 | I | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F1 | none | |
| AHC57 | IV | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F2 | none | |
| AHC80 | IV | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | ND | ||
| GDC540 | V | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F3 | ||
| GDC15 | III | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F4 | none | |
| GDC61 | IV | ~230 | HI2 | F5 | ||
| GXC03 | Unknown | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F6 | ||
| GDC127 | V | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F7 | none | |
| HNC06 | V | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | F8 | ||
| GD326 | V | ~230 | HI2 | F9 | none | |
| SDC20 | I | ~230 | HI2/ST3 | ND | none | |
| SDC10, SDC12 | I | ~45 | N | ND | none | |
| SDC15 | I | ~50 | N | ND | ||
| AHC51 | I | ~50 | N | ND | none | |
| GDC1-2 | I | ~75 | F2:A-:B- | ND | ||
| GDC56 | I | ~75 | F14:A-:B- | ND | ||
| AHC12 | I | ~80 | F18:A-:B- | ND | ||
| AHC16 | I | ~80 | F18:A-:B- | ND | ||
| GDC16 | I | ~70 | unknown | ND | ||
Contexts of fosA3 were as follows: I, IS26-316bp-fosA3-1758bp-IS26; II, IS26-316bp-fosA3-536bp-IS26; III, bla.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns differed by only a few bands (n = 1–3) were assigned to the same RFLP profile. ND, not determined.
Figure 1Schematic representation of the genetic contexts of . Regions of 100% homology are shaded in gray.