Literature DB >> 25565850

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the presence of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Antoni Sicras-Mainar1, Jorge Maurino2, Elena Ruiz-Beato3, Ruth Navarro-Artieda4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is one of the primary reasons for increased mortality in patients with schizophrenia. The mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of MetS in adult outpatients with schizophrenia according to the presence or absence of negative symptoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records was conducted. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative-symptom factor (N1-N4, N6, G7, and G16) was used as a framework for characterizing negative symptoms. MetS was defined using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III diagnostic criteria. An analysis of covariance model was used for correction, with significance at P<0.05.
RESULTS: One or more negative symptoms were present in 52.5% of a sample of 1,120 patients (mean age 46.8 years, men 58.4%). Dyslipidemia (48.7%), hypertension (38.2%), and diabetes mellitus (19.3%) were the most frequent comorbidities. The overall prevalence of MetS was 38.6% (95% confidence interval 35.7%-41.5%), and was significantly higher in those patients with negative symptoms (43.9% versus 34.9%, P=0.002). MetS was significantly associated with the presence of negative symptoms, age, and physical comorbidity (odds ratios 1.6, 1.2, and 1.2, respectively; P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: A sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical exercise due to negative symptomatology may contribute to MetS development. Further studies are necessary to confirm this association and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular risk; comorbidity; metabolic abnormalities; negative symptoms; physical illness; schizophrenia

Year:  2014        PMID: 25565850      PMCID: PMC4283985          DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S75449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat        ISSN: 1176-6328            Impact factor:   2.570


Introduction

Schizophrenia is one of the most severe mental disorders, and is among the twenty leading causes of disability worldwide.1 The mortality rate in patients with schizophrenia is two to three times higher than that expected in the general population, with a reduction in life expectancy of 10–25 years.2 Increased risk of suicide, an unhealthy lifestyle, poor physical health, and side effects of antipsychotic drugs are the four main reasons associated with excess early mortality in schizophrenia.3 Natural causes of death include those deriving from cardiovascular events.4 The high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in this population, such as obesity, dyslipidemia, alterations in carbohydrate metabolism, smoking, a sedentary lifestyle, and an unbalanced diet, as well as undesirable effects of antipsychotic drugs, explains the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rate in these patients.5 Negative symptoms are a key element of schizophrenia, affecting patients’ ability to cope with daily activities and having a negative impact on their quality of life.6,7 Negative symptoms are relatively common, and account for much of the long-term morbidity and poor functional outcome of patients with schizophrenia.6,8,9 Despite the introduction of atypical antipsychotics in the 1990s, their clinical management continues to be an unmet need.10 Compared with the general population, patients with schizophrenia are twice as likely to suffer from metabolic syndrome (MetS).11 The prevalence of MetS in patients with schizophrenia varies, ranging between 11% and 69% depending on the methodology used and the study population, although some recent meta-analyses have estimated it to be around 32.5%.12–15 Late onset, ethnicity, long duration of the illness, smoking, and exposure to antipsychotic drugs have generally been considered risk factors for developing MetS.11 However, no studies have been conducted to date to assess its prevalence according to the presence of different types of symptomatic domains. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of MetS and its individual components in a population of outpatients with schizophrenia according to the presence or absence of negative symptoms.

Materials and methods

Data source and patients

This was a noninterventional, retrospective, cohort study using electronic medical records held by the health care provider Badalona Serveis Assistencials (BSA). Key inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years; a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV-TR criteria; outpatients who required care in 2011; being under antipsychotic treatment; inclusion in the long-term prescription program (with a record of daily dose, time interval, and duration of each treatment administered); and guaranteed regular patient follow-up (presenting two or more health care records in the computer system). Data for these analyses were obtained from an observational study focused on health care-resource utilization and associated costs in patients with schizophrenia from the city of Badalona.16 The study protocol was approved by the investigational review board of the Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (Badalona, Spain).

Variables and measurement instruments

The seven items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder negative-symptom factor were used as a framework for characterizing negative symptoms from the database text fields: blunted affect (N1), emotional withdrawal (N2), poor rapport (N3), passive/apathetic social withdrawal (N4), lack of spontaneity and conversation flow (N6), motor retardation (G7), and active social avoidance (G16).17,18 The number of chronic diseases (diagnoses), the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the individual Case-Mix Index, obtained from the Adjusted Clinical Groups (a classification system based on the consumption of health care resources), were used to summarize general comorbidity variables for each patient.19,20 The clinical, biochemical and anthropometric parameters analyzed were systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), basal blood glucose (mg/dL), serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dL), and serum creatinine (mg/dL). The diagnosis of MetS was established when one same individual met three or more of the following components of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) diagnostic criteria: hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride concentration ≥150 mg/dL or treatment with triglyceride-lowering agents), dyslipidemia (fasting HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dL in males and <50 mg/dL in females), hypertension (systolic and diastolic blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or on antihypertensive medication), hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥110 mg/dL or on glucose-lowering drug treatment or a previous diagnosis of diabetes), and abdominal obesity (waist circumference >102 cm in males and >88 cm in females).21 In our study, the waist-circumference measurement was replaced by the BMI. A BMI ≥28.8 kg/m2 is considered to be equivalent to abdominal adiposity by different authors.22

Statistical analysis

Patients were distributed into two groups according to the presence or absence of negative symptoms: group 1 for patients presenting one or more negative symptoms, and group 2 for patients without negative symptoms. A descriptive univariate statistical analysis was performed with mean values, standard deviation (SD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), verifying normal distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The bivariate analysis included analysis of variance, the χ2 test and Pearson’s linear correlation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to obtain the variables associated with the patient profile (negative symptoms) and MetS, with the “Enter” method (Wald statistic). SPSS version 19 was used, establishing statistical significance for P-values <0.05.

Results

Of the initial selection of 88,798 subjects aged ≥18 years, 1,305 patients presented a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 1,120 were finally analyzed (Figure 1). Major sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 46.8 (SD 13.8) years, and 58.4% were male; 52.5% of the patients presented one or more negative symptoms (n=588, 95% CI 49.6%–55.4%). The prevalence of individual negative symptoms ranged from 26.1% (G16, active social avoidance) to 60.5% (N4, passive/apathetic social withdrawal). Only 27% of the patients simultaneously presented three or more negative symptoms.
Figure 1

Study diagram.

Notes: *Patients were excluded for the following reasons: missing or inconsistent data (n=33; 17.8%), lost to follow-up (n=45: 24.3%), moved to other areas (n=37; 20.0%), and other reasons (n=70; 37.9%).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study series

Group 1n=588Group 2n=532Totaln=1,120P-value
Sociodemographic characteristics
Mean age, years47.3 (12.2)46.5 (14.8)46.8 (13.8)0.351
Range
18–44 years40.0%47.9%44.6%
45–64 years57.0%43.2%48.8%
65–74 years2.8%8.6%6.3%
≥75 years0.2%0.3%0.3%<0.001
Sex, male67.7%52.0%58.4%<0.001
Overall comorbidity
Mean number of comorbidities8.5 (4.7)7.0 (4.1)7.6 (4.4)<0.001
Mean Charlson Index0.5 (0.8)0.4 (0.7)0.5 (0.8)0.130
Mean RUBs3.1 (0.6)3.0 (0.7)3.0 (0.7)0.098
Comorbid diagnoses
Hypertension44.1%34.1%38.2%0.001
Diabetes mellitus22.5%17.1%19.3%0.024
Dyslipidemia54.1%44.9%48.7%0.002
Obesity28.4%18.7%22.7%0.001
Active smoking28.4%30.5%29.6%0.443
Alcoholism7.2%5.4%6.2%0.227
Vascular events19.0%16.3%17.4%0.245
Bronchial asthma8.7%5.6%6.9%0.041
COPD5.9%3.6%4.6%0.073
Neuropathies3.9%3.0%3.4%0.409
Disease duration, mean, years19.918.218.90.093
Time under antipsychotic treatment, mean, years16.514.915.50.091
Number of CNS-active drugs, mean3.62.63.10.002
Antipsychotic drugs
Quetiapine34.5%30.8%32.3%0.194
Risperidone18.1%21.8%20.3%0.131
Olanzapine13.8%18.3%16.4%0.046

Notes: Group 1, presence of one or more negative symptoms; group 2, absence of negative symptoms.

Abbreviations: RUBs, resource-utilization bands; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CNS, central nervous system.

Quetiapine (32.3%), risperidone (20.3%), and olanzapine (16.4%) were the most common antipsychotic drugs administered. Time on antipsychotic drugs since diagnosis was 15.5 (SD 15.3) years, slightly longer in patients with negative symptoms (16.5 versus 14.9, P=0.091). Polypharmacy was common. The mean number of drugs per patient was 3.1 (SD 1.9), and was found to be significantly greater in group 1 (3.6 versus 2.6 for group 1 and group 2, respectively; P=0.002). Dyslipidemia (48.7%), hypertension (38.2%), and diabetes mellitus (19.3%) were the most frequent comorbid conditions. The total mean number of comorbid diagnoses was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (8.5 and 7.0, respectively; P<0.001). Table 2 shows the prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors and MetS in the total sample. The overall prevalence of MetS was 38.6% (95% CI 35.7%–41.5%), and was significantly higher in patients with negative symptoms (43.9% versus 34.9%, P=0.002). Three or more components of MetS were found in 44% of the sample. MetS was associated with the presence of negative symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–2.0), age (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4), and physical comorbidity (resource-utilization bands; OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3; P<0.05).
Table 2

Prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome

Group 1n=588Group 2n=532Totaln=1,120P-value
CVRFs, mean (SD)
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg125.1 (16.5)125.0 (17.6)125.0 (17.2)0.935
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg74.7 (10.8)74.1 (11.0)74.3 (10.9)0.362
Body mass index, kg/m229.3 (5.6)28.6 (5.7)28.9 (5.7)0.049
Glucose, mg/dL102.1 (32.8)99.7 (31.8)100.7 (32.2)0.229
Triglycerides, mg/dL134.7 (100.9)130.1 (74.0)132.0 (86.3)0.394
Total cholesterol, mg/dL202.3 (44.1)194.5 (40.8)197.8 (42.3)0.003
HDLc, mg/dL54.8 (15.4)52.4 (16.1)53.4 (15.8)0.015
LDLc, mg/dL121.5 (39.0)116.8 (34.3)118.8 (36.4)0.039
Serum creatinine, mg/dL1.1 (0.4)1.1 (0.4)1.1 (0.4)0.851
Metabolic syndrome
Prevalence*43.9%34.9%38.6%0.002
Components
BMI >28.8 kg/m250.2%42.4%45.6%0.010
BP >130/85 mmHg (or treatment)49.1%42.0%44.9%0.018
Triglycerides >150 mg/dL (or treatment)27.1%24.3%25.4%0.298
Fasting blood glucose >110 mg/dL22.7%19.2%20.6%0.152
HDLc <40 (men) or <50 (women) mg/dL19.4%20.7%20.2%0.605
Number of components
120.7%23.9%22.6%
222.5%21.8%22.1%
321.6%19.0%20.1%
415.9%12.4%13.8%
56.3%3.5%4.6%0.006

Notes:

Defined according to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Group 1, presence of one or more negative symptoms; group 2, absence of negative symptoms.

Abbreviations: CVRFs, cardiovascular risk factors; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HDLc, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SD, standard deviation.

Discussion

MetS is one of the primary reasons for increased mortality in patients with schizophrenia. In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the prevalence of MetS in different clinical settings and using several methodological approaches, presenting figures ranging from 11% to 69%.11 In five studies previously conducted in Spain, the prevalence of MetS in patients with schizophrenia was 19%–36.8% using the NCEP-ATP III diagnostic criteria.13,14,23–25 Gutiérrez-Rojas et al recently published a new study in which the prevalence was found to be 59.5% in a sample of overweight patients defined by a BMI >25 kg/m2.26 Our study once again confirms the high prevalence of MetS in a population of adult outpatients with schizophrenia (38.6%). However, it also found that the prevalence of MetS was associated with the presence of negative symptoms (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–2.0). Negative symptoms, such as blunt affect, lack of motivation, asociality, and impoverished speech are better predictors of functioning than positive symptoms, and are often associated with a poor response to available pharmacological treatments.6 In our study, 52% of the patients presented one or more negative symptoms, the most common being passive/apathetic social withdrawal and emotional withdrawal. It has been suggested that advanced-age patients with long-standing disease, patients with certain comorbidities, and those taking atypical antipsychotic drugs like clozapine and olanzapine have a greater risk of suffering from MetS.15,27,28 However, no studies have yet been conducted to assess its prevalence according to the presence of different types of symptom domains. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of MetS in schizophrenia are not well understood.15 A sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical exercise due to decreased spontaneity and drive, as well as other negative symptoms, may contribute to a higher prevalence of MetS. The presence of negative symptoms may also reduce help-seeking and physical health controls, and has recently been negatively correlated with BMI and positively correlated with HDL cholesterol in a sample of 372 chronic inpatients under antipsychotic treatment for more than 2 years. The authors suggested that patients with negative syndrome may have a different lipid pathophysiology in comparison with those who are less severe in this domain.29 Most evidence has emphasized the importance of extrinsic factors (calorie intake, lifestyle, antipsychotic medication) in its development, but the involvement of genetic factors is also supported.11 Our study has several limitations inherent to research based on population databases. The PANSS is not routinely completed in mental health services. Collecting negative symptoms from open text in the medical records may be associated with an underestimation of the true prevalence of these symptoms, due to the underregistration of them by the clinicians. In addition, the most severe cases were possibly not included in the study because they are usually not seen as outpatients. Furthermore, patients with subclinical or severe forms were not identified, as they were not all seen as outpatients and/or treatment adherence or other variables, such as socioeconomic levels, were not evaluated. Future research regarding schizophrenic patients with MetS should focus on the clinical impact, longitudinal follow-up to understand the factors that contribute to developing MetS, the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, and its impact on quality of life.15 Despite increased cardiometabolic risk in patients with mental disorders receiving antipsychotic drugs, metabolic monitoring is low in routine clinical practice.30 It is important to identify high-risk patients and educate them about preventive measures.31 A sensible approach when prescribing antipsychotic drugs is also advisable, as well as reviewing the medication regularly in order to maintain a balance between adequate symptomatic control and the development of metabolic abnormalities. Moreover, one of the most important objectives of pharmacological research should be to develop new antipsychotic agents with reduced associated risk, fast action, greater effect on negative, affective, and cognitive symptoms, and improved rate of recurrence, along with reduction or disappearance of cumulative comorbidity. In conclusion, the prevalence of MetS in patients with schizophrenia is high. MetS was associated with age, comorbidity, and the presence of negative symptoms. Due to the proven impact that negative symptoms have on the subjective well-being, functioning, and quality of life of patients, and probably also on their predisposition to develop metabolic disorders, it is essential for clinicians to detect them early and to decide on the best-possible therapeutic approach. Further studies need to be undertaken in order to replicate the findings of this association, and to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
  31 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Negative symptoms have greater impact on functioning than positive symptoms in schizophrenia: analysis of CATIE data.

Authors:  Jonathan Rabinowitz; Stephen Z Levine; George Garibaldi; Dragana Bugarski-Kirola; Carmen Galani Berardo; Shitij Kapur
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 4.  Excess early mortality in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Thomas Munk Laursen; Merete Nordentoft; Preben Bo Mortensen
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Cardiovascular and metabolic risk in outpatients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics: results of the CLAMORS Study.

Authors:  Julio Bobes; Celso Arango; Pedro Aranda; Rafael Carmena; Margarida Garcia-Garcia; Javier Rejas
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Physical illness and schizophrenia: a review of the literature.

Authors:  S Leucht; T Burkard; J Henderson; M Maj; N Sartorius
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 7.  Is the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic abnormalities increased in early schizophrenia? A comparative meta-analysis of first episode, untreated and treated patients.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Davy Vancampfort; Amber De Herdt; Weiping Yu; Marc De Hert
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.

Authors:  J P Weiner; B H Starfield; D M Steinwachs; L M Mumford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Severity of psychosis syndrome and change of metabolic abnormality in chronic schizophrenia patients: severe negative syndrome may be related to a distinct lipid pathophysiology.

Authors:  S-F Chen; T-M Hu; T-H Lan; H-J Chiu; L-Y Sheen; E-W Loh
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.361

10.  Metabolic syndrome in outpatients receiving antipsychotic therapy in routine clinical practice: a cross-sectional assessment of a primary health care database.

Authors:  Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Milagrosa Blanca-Tamayo; Javier Rejas-Gutiérrez; Ruth Navarro-Artieda
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.361

View more
  14 in total

1.  Medical Co-morbidities Among Patients with Severe Mental Illnesses in a Community Health Facility in Nigeria.

Authors:  Victor Olufolahan Lasebikan; Joachim Azegbeobor
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-11-25

2.  Predictive Utility of Body Mass Index for Metabolic Syndrome Among Patients with Schizophrenia in Japan.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Manabu Yamazaki; Kazutaka Shimoda; Takao Mori; Takuro Sugai; Hiroshi Matsuda; Yutaro Suzuki; Yuji Ozeki; Kurefu Okamoto; Toyoaki Sagae; Toshiyuki Someya
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Complement 3 and metabolic syndrome induced by clozapine: a cross-sectional study and retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  C Zhang; Y Zhang; J Cai; M Chen; L Song
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Attitudes toward metabolic adverse events among patients with schizophrenia in Japan.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Manabu Yamazaki; Kazutaka Shimoda; Takao Mori; Takuro Sugai; Hiroshi Matsuda; Yutaro Suzuki; Yoshitake Minami; Yuji Ozeki; Kurefu Okamoto; Toyoaki Sagae; Toshiyuki Someya
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Amisulpride Switching in Schizophrenic Patients Who Showed Suboptimal Effect and/or Tolerability to Current Antipsychotics in a Naturalistic Setting: An Explorative Study.

Authors:  Yongmin Kim; Sheng-Min Wang; Kyung-Phil Kwak; Ho-Kyoung Yoon; Chi-Un Pae; Jung-Jin Kim; Won-Myong Bahk
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 6.  Using Functional Analysis as a Framework to Guide Individualized Treatment for Negative Symptoms.

Authors:  Tania M Lincoln; Marcel Riehle; Matthias Pillny; Sylvia Helbig-Lang; Anne-Katharina Fladung; Matthias Hartmann-Riemer; Stefan Kaiser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-05

7.  Prevalence of polymorphisms in the ANKK1, DRD2, DRD3 genes and metabolic syndrome in refractory schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jeizziani Aparecida Ferreira Pinto; Pedro Henrique Batista de Freitas; Fernanda Daniela Dorneles Nunes; Paulo Afonso Granjeiro; Luciana Lara Dos Santos; Richardson Miranda Machado
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-05-17

8.  Clinical Correlates of Insulin Resistance in Chronic Schizophrenia: Relationship to Negative Symptoms.

Authors:  Virawudh Soontornniyomkij; Ellen E Lee; Hua Jin; Averria Sirkin Martin; Rebecca E Daly; Jinyuan Liu; Xin M Tu; Lisa Todd Eyler; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  The Cohort Study on Prediction of Incidence of All-Cause Mortality by Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Zhixia Li; Xinghua Yang; Jun Yang; Zhirong Yang; Shengfeng Wang; Feng Sun; Siyan Zhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Risk Factors of Metabolic Syndrome in Community-Dwelling People with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Min Jung Sun; Mi Heui Jang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.