| Literature DB >> 25565295 |
Benoît Plancoulaine, Myriam Oger, Nicolas Elie, Philippe Belhomme, Paulette Herlin, Abir Nasri, Célia Augé, Mylène Brécin, Jacques Marnay, Catherine Bor-Angelier.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently available microscope slide scanners produce whole slide images at various resolutions from histological sections. Nevertheless, acquisition area and so visualization of large tissue samples are limited by the standardized size of glass slides, used daily in pathology departments. The proposed solution has been developed to build composite virtual slides from images of large tumor fragments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25565295 PMCID: PMC4305979 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Figure 1Straightening and stitching of the binary masks. Straightening and stitching of the binary masks of a) two tissue fragments to obtain an horizontal strip, b) two horizontal strips to obtain the composite image.
Figure 2From surgical specimen to Composite Virtual Slide. a) Most representative slice of the surgical specimen; b) embedding cassettes containing all pieces of the entire slice; c) 5µm histological sections stained according to HES protocol; d) Composite Virtual Slide obtained after using the WSI-tiling strategy.
Details of the 60 reconstructed images, ranked according to the size of the tissue slice.
| # Patient | Staining | # of WSI | Size in pixels | Size in GB | Size of the slice (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | HES | 25 | 246576 × 425856 | 293.4 | 230 × 110 |
| 2 | HES | 26 | 246576 × 556080 | 383.1 | ||
| 3 | 2 | Ki67 | 10 | 101040 × 373024 | 105.3 | 200 × 55 |
| 4 | 3 | HES | 18 | 104384 × 513664 | 149.8 | 200 × 40 |
| 5 | HES | 6 | 104400 × 142592 | 41.6 | ||
| 6 | ER | 6 | 104048 × 155248 | 45.1 | ||
| 7 | PR | 6 | 104400 × 143392 | 41.8 | ||
| 8 | Ki67 | 6 | 98992 × 139424 | 38.6 | ||
| 9 | HES | 6 | 104400 × 142592 | 41.6 | ||
| 10 | 4 | HES | 8 | 250272 × 42816 | 29.94 | 200 × 30 |
| 11 | HES | 8 | 285376 × 83792 | 66.8 | ||
| 12 | 5 | HES | 14 | 99680 × 449120 | 125.1 | 170 × 40 |
| 13 | 6 | HES | 17 | 332976 × 144848 | 134.8 | 150 × 80 |
| 14 | 7 | HES | 11 | 145792 × 286464 | 116.7 | 140 × 70 |
| 15 | ER | 11 | 143984 × 298256 | 120 | ||
| 16 | PR | 11 | 145792 × 298992 | 121.8 | ||
| 17 | Ki67 | 11 | 147584 × 311872 | 128.6 | ||
| 18 | HER | 11 | 143984 × 298256 | 120 | ||
| 19 | HES | 7 | 151184 × 122064 | 51.6 | ||
| 20 | HES | 17 | 161667 × 381488 | 172.3 | ||
| 21 | 8a (Tumor) | ER | 9 | 149392 × 193264 | 80.7 | 85 × 65 |
| 22 | PR | 7 | 147584 × 145888 | 60.2 | ||
| 23 | Ki67 | 7 | 150192 × 148928 | 62.5 | ||
| 24 | 8b (Metastasis) | HES | 4 | 109792 × 96384 | 29.6 | 45 × 50 |
| 25 | PR | 4 | 109792 × 93248 | 28.6 | ||
| 26 | 9 | HES | 6 | 194384 × 88800 | 48.2 | 82 × 35 |
| 27 | 10 | HES | 3 | 163792 × 51280 | 23.5 | 80 × 25 |
| 28 | 11 | HES | 3 | 62432 × 141296 | 24.6 | 70 × 30 |
| 29 | 12 | HES | 3 | 134384 × 57680 | 21.7 | 65 × 35 |
| 30 | ER | 3 | 58896 × 122928 | 20.2 | ||
| 31 | PR | 3 | 55456 × 128640 | 19.9 | ||
| 32 | Ki67 | 3 | 63600 × 127392 | 22.6 | ||
| 33 | HER | 3 | 64528 × 122288 | 22 | ||
| 34 | HES | 3 | 56256 × 135200 | 21.3 | ||
| 35 | 13 | HES | 4 | 115200 × 82997 | 26.7 | 60 × 40 |
| 36 | HES | 4 | 116752 × 88896 | 29 | ||
| 37 | ER | 4 | 109800 × 90343 | 27.7 | ||
| 38 | PR | 4 | 109800 × 91497 | 28.1 | ||
| 39 | Ki67 | 4 | 115200 × 94360 | 30.4 | ||
| 40 | PAS | 4 | 117000 × 86126 | 28.2 | ||
| 41 | PHH3 | 4 | 120600 × 90403 | 30.5 | ||
| 42 | CD31 | 4 | 117000 × 93036 | 30.4 | ||
| 43 | 14 | HES | 4 | 118784 × 90032 | 29.9 | 55 × 35 |
| 44 | ER | 4 | 122400 × 88240 | 30.2 | ||
| 45 | PR | 4 | 122384 × 89216 | 30.5 | ||
| 46 | Ki67 | 4 | 116992 × 88928 | 29.1 | ||
| 47 | 15 | HES | 2 | 100800 × 48016 | 13.5 | 55 × 25 |
| 48 | ER | 2 | 98992 × 49584 | 13.7 | ||
| 49 | PR | 2 | 95392 × 49744 | 13.3 | ||
| 50 | HES | 2 | 100784 × 48336 | 13.6 | ||
| 51 | 16 | HES | 2 | 72000 × 82544 | 16.6 | 50 × 35 |
| 52 | ER | 2 | 61120 × 79440 | 13.6 | ||
| 53 | PR | 2 | 61200 × 81744 | 14 | ||
| 54 | Ki67 | 2 | 62992 × 80336 | 14.1 | ||
| 55 | HES | 2 | 73184 × 85488 | 17.5 | ||
| 56 | 17 | HES | 2 | 52928 × 89344 | 13.2 | 50 × 25 |
| 57 | HES | 2 | 52192 × 87456 | 12.8 | ||
| 58 | 18 | HES | 2 | 91792 × 40688 | 10.4 | 50 × 20 |
| 59 | 19 | HES | 2 | 59808 × 88256 | 14.7 | 45 × 25 |
| 60 | 20 | HES | 2 | 66816 × 83872 | 15.7 | 40 × 30 |
Figure 3Detail of a stitching zone after WSI-tiling strategy. Left: detail of the left WSI; center: detail of the right WSI; right: final CVS coming from two WSI.
Figure 4Example of quality control result. a) Gallery of the sampled original WSI; b) Gallery of the sampled CVS; c) 3D representation of the correlation coefficient between pairs of registered thumbnails.
Quality control results: Correlation coefficients computed on pairs of high resolution thumbnail galleries from CVS.
| Image | number of fragments per image | Sampling | number of thumbnails per gallery | Correlation coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image 1 | 5 | 1st | 90 | 98.70% |
| 2nd | 90 | 98.51% | ||
| 3rd | 90 | 98.45% | ||
| 4th | 90 | 98.44% | ||
| Image 2 | 4 | 1st | 20 | 98.14% |
| 2nd | 16 | 97.26% | ||
| 3rd | 16 | 97.40% | ||
| 4th | 16 | 98.46% | ||
| Image 3 | 17 | 1st | 315 | 99.23% |
| 2nd | 330 | 99.25% | ||
| 3rd | 315 | 99.23% | ||
| 4th | 315 | 99.22% | ||
| Image 4 | 12 | 1st | 396 | 98.70% |
| 2nd | 418 | 98.64% | ||
| 3rd | 396 | 98.72% | ||
| 4th | 396 | 98.84% | ||
| Image 5 | 6 | 1st | 238 | 99.25% |
| 2nd | 208 | 99.24% | ||
| 3rd | 221 | 99.27% | ||
| 4th | 221 | 99.23% | ||