Literature DB >> 25564929

The role of biventricular pacing in the prevention and therapy of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

Maya Guglin1, S Serge Barold2.   

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) pacing produces well-known long-term deleterious effects not only on already compromised, but also on the normal left ventricle (LV). The activation pattern mimicks that of left bundle branch block, with delayed activation of the LV free wall, and results in electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. Long-term mandatory (100%) RV pacing, increases LV dimensions and decreases the ejection fraction. Many of these negative effects of pacing can be overcome by biventricular pacing. In this review, we describe the characteristics of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy, its incidence, and the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for its therapy and prevention. The gaps in the current organizational guidelines for using CRT in the treatment of bradycardia are identified, and goals for future research are discussed.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; pacemaker-mediated cardiomyopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564929      PMCID: PMC6931542          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  86 in total

1.  The benefit of upgrading chronically right ventricle-paced heart failure patients to resynchronization therapy demonstrated by strain rate imaging.

Authors:  Zayd A Eldadah; Boaz Rosen; Ilan Hay; Thor Edvardsen; Vinod Jayam; Timm Dickfeld; Glenn R Meininger; Daniel P Judge; Joshua Hare; Joao B Lima; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Conventional versus biventricular pacing in heart failure and bradyarrhythmia: the COMBAT study.

Authors:  Martino Martinelli Filho; Sérgio Freitas de Siqueira; Roberto Costa; Oswaldo T Greco; Luiz Felipe Moreira; Andre D'avila; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 5.  The effects of ventricular asynchrony on myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Zenon S Kyriakides; Athanase G Manolis; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial.

Authors:  Arjun D Sharma; Carlos Rizo-Patron; Alfred P Hallstrom; Gearoid P O'Neill; Stephen Rothbart; James B Martins; Marc Roelke; Jonathan S Steinberg; H Leon Greene
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades.

Authors:  Nigussie Bogale; Klaus Witte; Silvia Priori; John Cleland; Angelo Auricchio; Fredrik Gadler; Anselm Gitt; Tobias Limbourg; Cecilia Linde; Kenneth Dickstein
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Maher Nahlawi; Michael Waligora; Stewart M Spies; Robert O Bonow; Alan H Kadish; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Biventricular pacing preserves left ventricular performance in patients with high-grade atrio-ventricular block: a randomized comparison with DDD(R) pacing in 50 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andi E Albertsen; Jens C Nielsen; Steen H Poulsen; Peter T Mortensen; Anders K Pedersen; Peter S Hansen; Henrik K Jensen; Henrik Egeblad
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Addition of a left ventricular lead to conventional pacing systems in patients with congestive heart failure: feasibility, safety, and early results in 60 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Cindy M Baker; Thomas J Christopher; Paige F Smith; Jonathan J Langberg; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adverse Consequences of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing and Novel Strategies to Optimize Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function.

Authors:  Mohammad Reeaze Khurwolah; Jing Yao; Xiang-Qing Kong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.