Literature DB >> 16567291

The benefit of upgrading chronically right ventricle-paced heart failure patients to resynchronization therapy demonstrated by strain rate imaging.

Zayd A Eldadah1, Boaz Rosen, Ilan Hay, Thor Edvardsen, Vinod Jayam, Timm Dickfeld, Glenn R Meininger, Daniel P Judge, Joshua Hare, Joao B Lima, Hugh Calkins, Ronald D Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: RV pacing induces conduction delay (CD), mechanical dyssynchrony, and increased morbidity in patients with HF. CRT improves HF symptoms and survival, but sparse data exist on its direct effect on chronically RV-paced HF patients.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in chronically right ventricle (RV)-paced heart failure (HF) patients.
METHODS: We studied 12 consecutive patients with class III HF who had a previously implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. These individuals were chronically RV paced and referred for upgrade to a biventricular device by their primary cardiologists. Tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging (TDI and SRI, respectively) were performed immediately before each upgrade and 4-6 weeks afterward to quantify changes in regional wall motion and synchrony with CRT.
RESULTS: CRT significantly reduced the mean QRS duration (205 ms to 156 ms; P<.0001), and it increased the ejection fraction (30.7%+/-5.1% to 35.8%+/-5.1%; P<.01). Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were also significantly reduced. Clinically, patients improved by an average of one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class after upgrade (P = .006). The parameter exhibiting greatest improvement was the coefficient of variation (CoV: standard deviation/mean) of time to peak systolic strain rate, a marker of ventricular dyssynchrony, which decreased from 34.3%+/-13.0% to 19.0%+/-6.6% (P<.01). Reduction in CoV of time to peak systolic strain rate was maximally seen in the midventricle (38.2%+/-19.6% to 16.5%+/-9.7%; P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Upgrading chronically RV-paced HF patients to CRT improves global and regional systolic function. TDI and SRI provide compelling evidence that this benefit parallels that seen in HF patients with CD unrelated to RV pacing, which implies that biventricular pacing synchronizes mechanical activation in different myocardial regions in patients upgraded from RV pacing as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16567291     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  14 in total

Review 1.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Mitral valve disease--morphology and mechanisms.

Authors:  Robert A Levine; Albert A Hagége; Daniel P Judge; Muralidhar Padala; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Elena Aikawa; Jonathan Beaudoin; Joyce Bischoff; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Patrick Bruneval; Jonathan T Butcher; Alain Carpentier; Miguel Chaput; Adrian H Chester; Catherine Clusel; Francesca N Delling; Harry C Dietz; Christian Dina; Ronen Durst; Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Mark D Handschumacher; Morten O Jensen; Xavier P Jeunemaitre; Hervé Le Marec; Thierry Le Tourneau; Roger R Markwald; Jean Mérot; Emmanuel Messas; David P Milan; Tui Neri; Russell A Norris; David Peal; Maelle Perrocheau; Vincent Probst; Michael Pucéat; Nadia Rosenthal; Jorge Solis; Jean-Jacques Schott; Ehud Schwammenthal; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Jae-Kwan Song; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Selective site pacing: rationale and practical application.

Authors:  Sameer Parekh; Kenneth M Stein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

Review 5.  The role of biventricular pacing in the prevention and therapy of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Maya Guglin; S Serge Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Symptom improvement after upgrade from right ventricular apical to biventricular pacing: Role of right and left ventricular volumes assessed with single-photon emission computed tomographic equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography.

Authors:  Ian P Clements; Stuart Christenson; David O Hodge; Brian P Mullan; Margaret M Redfield; David L Hayes
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Expanding indications for resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; Nathalie Behar; Philippe Mabo; Jean-Claude Daubert
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Quantitative analysis of intraventricular dyssynchrony using wall thickness by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Jagmeet P Singh; Christopher P Cannon; Ammar Sarwar; Khurram Nasir; Angelo Auricchio; Francesco F Faletra; Antonio Sorgente; Cristina Conca; Tiziano Moccetti; Mark Handschumacher; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11

9.  QRS narrowing is associated with reverse remodeling in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Alan Cheng; David Spragg; Daniel Cantillon; Mina K Chung; W H Wilson Tang; Bruce L Wilkoff; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Current Evidence and Recommendations for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew J Dewhurst; Nicholas J Linker
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.