Literature DB >> 25564862

Subdomain interactions foster the design of two protein pairs with ∼80% sequence identity but different folds.

Lauren L Porter1, Yanan He2, Yihong Chen2, John Orban3, Philip N Bryan4.   

Abstract

Metamorphic proteins, including proteins with high levels of sequence identity but different folds, are exceptions to the long-standing rule-of-thumb that proteins with as little as 30% sequence identity adopt the same fold. Which topologies can be bridged by these highly identical sequences remains an open question. Here we bridge two 3-α-helix bundle proteins with two radically different folds. Using a straightforward approach, we engineered the sequences of one subdomain within maltose binding protein (MBP, α/β/α-sandwich) and another within outer surface protein A (OspA, β-sheet) to have high sequence identity (80 and 77%, respectively) with engineered variants of protein G (GA, 3-α-helix bundle). Circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of all engineered variants demonstrate that they maintain their native conformations despite substantial sequence modification. Furthermore, the MBP variant (80% identical to GA) remained active. Thermodynamic analysis of numerous GA and MBP variants suggests that the key to our approach involved stabilizing the modified MBP and OspA subdomains via external interactions with neighboring substructures, indicating that subdomain interactions can stabilize alternative folds over a broad range of sequence variation. These findings suggest that it is possible to bridge one fold with many other topologies, which has implications for protein folding, evolution, and misfolding diseases.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564862      PMCID: PMC4286614          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  42 in total

1.  Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  B Rost
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1999-02

2.  Engineering subtilisin into a fluoride-triggered processing protease useful for one-step protein purification.

Authors:  Biao Ruan; Kathryn E Fisher; Patrick A Alexander; Viktoriya Doroshko; Philip N Bryan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Computational design of a single amino acid sequence that can switch between two distinct protein folds.

Authors:  Xavier I Ambroggio; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Protein alchemy: changing beta-sheet into alpha-helix.

Authors:  S Dalal; S Balasubramanian; L Regan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1997-07

5.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.

Authors:  C A Orengo; A D Michie; S Jones; D T Jones; M B Swindells; J M Thornton
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  A hybrid sequence approach to the paracelsus challenge.

Authors:  S M Yuan; N D Clarke
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-02-01

7.  Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence.

Authors:  D L Minor; P S Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Disulfide isomerization after membrane release of its SAR domain activates P1 lysozyme.

Authors:  Min Xu; Arockiasamy Arulandu; Douglas K Struck; Stephanie Swanson; James C Sacchettini; Ry Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Thermodynamic characterization of the reversible, two-state unfolding of maltose binding protein, a large two-domain protein.

Authors:  C Ganesh; A N Shah; C P Swaminathan; A Surolia; R Varadarajan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-04-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  PISCES: recent improvements to a PDB sequence culling server.

Authors:  Guoli Wang; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  13 in total

1.  Studying protein fold evolution with hybrids of differently folded homologs.

Authors:  Karen V Eaton; William J Anderson; Matthew S Dubrava; Vlad K Kumirov; Emily M Dykstra; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Two is a pair, three is a network.

Authors:  Ron Elber
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Multistep mutational transformation of a protein fold through structural intermediates.

Authors:  Vlad K Kumirov; Emily M Dykstra; Branwen M Hall; William J Anderson; Taylor N Szyszka; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Structural metamorphism and polymorphism in proteins on the brink of thermodynamic stability.

Authors:  Prakash Kulkarni; Tsega L Solomon; Yanan He; Yihong Chen; Philip N Bryan; John Orban
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Why Proteins are Big: Length Scale Effects on Equilibria and Kinetics.

Authors:  Kenneth A Rubinson
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Structural origins of misfolding propensity in the platelet adhesive von Willebrand factor A1 domain.

Authors:  Michael T Zimmermann; Alexander Tischer; Steven T Whitten; Matthew Auton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The role of negative selection in protein evolution revealed through the energetics of the native state ensemble.

Authors:  Jordan Hoffmann; James O Wrabl; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-02-13

8.  Predictable fold switching by the SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF9b.

Authors:  Lauren L Porter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Extant fold-switching proteins are widespread.

Authors:  Lauren L Porter; Loren L Looger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structure of the Hydrophobic Core Determines the 3D Protein Structure-Verification by Single Mutation Proteins.

Authors:  Mateusz Banach; Piotr Fabian; Katarzyna Stapor; Leszek Konieczny; And Irena Roterman
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.