Shaheena Banu1, Syed Tanveer2, C N Manjunath2. 1. Department of Biochemistry, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, India. 2. Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, India.
Abstract
AIM AND BACKGROUND: Heart-type fatty acid-binding proteins (H-FABP) which are detected within 2-3 h of acute myocardial infarction are involved in uptake of free fatty acids in the myocardium. Our aim in the present study is to compare window periods of H-FABP to high sensitivity troponin T (hs-Trop T) in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: 160 STEMI diagnosed patient's serum samples are analyzed for hs-Trop T and H-FABP. Different window periods of chest pain onset (<3 h, 3-6 h and >6 h) are compared with complications, in-hospital mortality and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: From 160 patients, 53 (33%) cases are presented in <3 h, 75 (47%) in 3-6, and 32 (20%) after >6 h respectively. Accordingly sensitivity of hs-Trop T was 92%, 94% and 97% while H-FABP was 75%, 88% and 84%, respectively. Overall sensitivity was 94% and 82% respectively. Statistically significant difference between mean hs-Trop T values with respect to window period <3, 3-6 and >6 h was 0.21, 0.35 and 0.80 ng/ml respectively, p value < 0.0001. No significant difference in H-FABP values was observed. Hs-Trop T positively correlated with age (r = 0.153, P = 0.05), window period (r = 0.363, P < 0.0001), TIMI score (r = 0.208, P = 0.008), ejection fraction (r = 0.191, P = 0.008), serum H-FABP (r = 0.229, P = 0.004), and serum hs-CRP (r = 0.326, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference of mean hs-Trop T values with or without in hospital mortality (0.35 vs. 0.85 ng/ml, respectively, p = 0.008). No significant correlation to age, TIMI score, ejection fraction and hs-CRP values for H-FABP was observed. CONCLUSION: It appears that hs-Trop T is a more sensitive marker than H-FABP in early hours of AMI and higher hs-Trop T predicts increase in-hospital mortality.
AIM AND BACKGROUND: Heart-type fatty acid-binding proteins (H-FABP) which are detected within 2-3 h of acute myocardial infarction are involved in uptake of free fatty acids in the myocardium. Our aim in the present study is to compare window periods of H-FABP to high sensitivity troponin T (hs-Trop T) in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: 160 STEMI diagnosed patient's serum samples are analyzed for hs-Trop T and H-FABP. Different window periods of chest pain onset (<3 h, 3-6 h and >6 h) are compared with complications, in-hospital mortality and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: From 160 patients, 53 (33%) cases are presented in <3 h, 75 (47%) in 3-6, and 32 (20%) after >6 h respectively. Accordingly sensitivity of hs-Trop T was 92%, 94% and 97% while H-FABP was 75%, 88% and 84%, respectively. Overall sensitivity was 94% and 82% respectively. Statistically significant difference between mean hs-Trop T values with respect to window period <3, 3-6 and >6 h was 0.21, 0.35 and 0.80 ng/ml respectively, p value < 0.0001. No significant difference in H-FABP values was observed. Hs-Trop T positively correlated with age (r = 0.153, P = 0.05), window period (r = 0.363, P < 0.0001), TIMI score (r = 0.208, P = 0.008), ejection fraction (r = 0.191, P = 0.008), serum H-FABP (r = 0.229, P = 0.004), and serum hs-CRP (r = 0.326, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference of mean hs-Trop T values with or without in hospital mortality (0.35 vs. 0.85 ng/ml, respectively, p = 0.008). No significant correlation to age, TIMI score, ejection fraction and hs-CRP values for H-FABP was observed. CONCLUSION: It appears that hs-Trop T is a more sensitive marker than H-FABP in early hours of AMI and higher hs-Trop T predicts increase in-hospital mortality.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acute coronary syndrome; Heart fatty acid binding protein; High sensitive-CRP; High sensitive-troponin T
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Hugo A Katus; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasché; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F Okamoto; K Sohmiya; Y Ohkaru; K Kawamura; K Asayama; H Kimura; S Nishimura; H Ishii; N Sunahara; T Tanaka Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: J Ishii; J H Wang; H Naruse; S Taga; M Kinoshita; H Kurokawa; M Iwase; T Kondo; M Nomura; Y Nagamura; Y Watanabe; H Hishida; T Tanaka; K Kawamura Journal: Clin Chem Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Hector Alonso Valle; Luis García-Castrillo Riesgo; Miguel Sántalo Bel; Francisco Epelde Gonzalo; Miguel Sánchez Sanchez; Luis Iglesias Oliva Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: P Mad; H Domanovits; C Fazelnia; K Stiassny; G Russmüller; A Cseh; G Sodeck; T Binder; G Christ; T Szekeres; A Laggner; H Herkner Journal: QJM Date: 2007-03-08