Literature DB >> 25561191

Clinicopathological significance of mucin production in patients with papillary cholangiocarcinoma.

Shunsuke Onoe1, Yoshie Shimoyama, Tomoki Ebata, Yukihiro Yokoyama, Tsuyoshi Igami, Gen Sugawara, Takashi Mizuno, Shigeo Nakamura, Masato Nagino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathologic significance of mucin production in patients with papillary cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) is still controversial. We aimed at clarifying the similarities and differences between PCC cases with and without mucin secretion with regard to biological behavior and clinical course.
METHODS: Among 644 patients with surgically resected cholangiocarcinoma (1998-2011), 184 (28 %) patients were considered to have PCC and were enrolled in the study. Those patients were divided into two groups based on whether their PCC was mucin-producing (PCC-M, n = 89) or not (PCC-NM, n = 95). The presence of mucin secretion was determined by the cut surface of the specimens and by pathologic examination.
RESULTS: The clinicopathological features of PCC-M and PCC-NM largely overlapped. No significant between-group differences in malignant potential characteristics, including the depth of invasion, pathological T classification, and regional/periaortic lymph node metastasis, were observed (P = 0.193, 0.181, 0.083, and 0.674, respectively). However, a few clinicopathological differences existed between the two PCC types, i.e., the predominant histological type and epithelial subtype (P < 0.001 and P = 0.016, respectively). Immunohistochemically, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and HGM were more frequently expressed in PCC-M than PCC-NM (P < 0.002 in all). The disease-specific survival values were not significantly different between the two PCC types (PCC-M; 60 % at 5 year, PCC-NM; 46 %, P = 0.097).
CONCLUSION: PCC-M and PCC-NM were similar in morphology and prognosis. Although a few clinicopathological differences exist between them, their overlapping features and identical survival curves appear to justify the lack of a specific treatment modality for either type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25561191     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2923-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  25 in total

1.  The clinicopathological features of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Wentao Wang; Lunan Yan
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Pathologic features of mucin-producing bile duct tumors: two histopathologic categories as counterparts of pancreatic intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shibahara; Shugo Tamada; Masamichi Goto; Koji Oda; Masato Nagino; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Surinder K Batra; Michael A Hollingsworth; Kohzoh Imai; Yuji Nimura; Suguru Yonezawa
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a biliary equivalent to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas?

Authors:  Flavio G Rocha; Hwajeong Lee; Nora Katabi; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Similarities and differences between intraductal papillary tumors of the bile duct with and without macroscopically visible mucin secretion.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohtsuka; Fumio Kimura; Hiroaki Shimizu; Hiroyuki Yoshidome; Atsushi Kato; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Katsunori Furukawa; Dan Takeuchi; Tsukasa Takayashiki; Kosuke Suda; Shigetsugu Takano; Yoichiro Kondo; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Pathological appraisal of lines of resection for bile duct carcinoma.

Authors:  T Ebata; H Watanabe; Y Ajioka; K Oda; Y Nimura
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Long-term clinical outcome of the surgically resected intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct.

Authors:  Geunyoung Jung; Kwang-Min Park; Seung Soo Lee; Eunsil Yu; Seung-Mo Hong; Jihun Kim
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Clinical studies of mucin-producing cholangiocellular carcinoma: a study of 22 histopathology-proven cases.

Authors:  M F Chen; Y Y Jan; T C Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid.

Authors:  T Ebata; J Kamiya; H Nishio; T Nagasaka; Y Nimura; M Nagino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Tumorigenesis and phenotypic characteristics of mucin-producing bile duct tumors: an immunohistochemical approach.

Authors:  Yasuni Nakanuma; Yoh Zen; Kenichi Harada; Hiroko Ikeda; Yasunori Sato; Takeshi Uehara; Motoko Sasaki
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.027

10.  Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  T Ebata; T Kosuge; S Hirano; M Unno; M Yamamoto; M Miyazaki; N Kokudo; S Miyagawa; T Takada; M Nagino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Occult mucin-producing cholangiocarcinoma in situ: a rare clinical case with difficult tumour staging.

Authors:  Muneyasu Kiriyama; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Takashi Mizuno; Junpei Yamaguchi; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-01-04

2.  Human primary liver cancer organoids reveal intratumor and interpatient drug response heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ling Li; Hildur Knutsdottir; Ken Hui; Matthew J Weiss; Jin He; Benjamin Philosophe; Andrew M Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik; Gabriel Ghiaur; Andrew J Ewald; Esteban Mezey; Joel S Bader; Florin M Selaru
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-01-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.