Esra Yancar Demir1, Tuba Özcan2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey. 2. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as 'a cognitive decline greater than that expected for an individual's age and education level but that does not interfere notably with activities of daily life'. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test for MCI. METHODS: We investigated the performance of the Turkish version of the MoCA in detecting MCI among elderly persons in a rural area, the majority of whom have a low level of education. We evaluated 50 consecutive men referred from an outpatient clinic. Educational level was divided into three categories: group 1, less than primary (<5 years); group 2, primary (5 years); group 3, more than primary (>5 years). We evaluated the effect of education on MoCA scores and compared subjects' test performance among the different categories of education level. RESULTS: A total of 50 male patients with MCI (mean age: 70.74 ± 7.87) met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the total scores based on education or in the subscores for visuospatial/executive function, naming, attention, abstraction and delayed recall. Language was the only domain that showed significant differences between the groups. In post-hoc analysis, differences were found between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 1 and 2. Group 1 had significantly lower scores for language. The repeat subscore for language was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2. In fluency, there were significant differences between groups 2 and 3 and between group 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the applicability of the Turkish version of MoCA in populations with little education. Our results emphasize the need to adapt the language sections of this test, so it can be easily used in populations with low education levels.
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as 'a cognitive decline greater than that expected for an individual's age and education level but that does not interfere notably with activities of daily life'. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test for MCI. METHODS: We investigated the performance of the Turkish version of the MoCA in detecting MCI among elderly persons in a rural area, the majority of whom have a low level of education. We evaluated 50 consecutive men referred from an outpatient clinic. Educational level was divided into three categories: group 1, less than primary (<5 years); group 2, primary (5 years); group 3, more than primary (>5 years). We evaluated the effect of education on MoCA scores and compared subjects' test performance among the different categories of education level. RESULTS: A total of 50 male patients with MCI (mean age: 70.74 ± 7.87) met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the total scores based on education or in the subscores for visuospatial/executive function, naming, attention, abstraction and delayed recall. Language was the only domain that showed significant differences between the groups. In post-hoc analysis, differences were found between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 1 and 2. Group 1 had significantly lower scores for language. The repeat subscore for language was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2. In fluency, there were significant differences between groups 2 and 3 and between group 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the applicability of the Turkish version of MoCA in populations with little education. Our results emphasize the need to adapt the language sections of this test, so it can be easily used in populations with low education levels.
Authors: Chase C Hansen; Joshua B Smith; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Collin F Mulcahy; Jeffrey S Wefel; Katherine A Hutcheson; Kelsey Chrane; Jack Phan; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; Blaine D Smith; Hillary Eichelberger; Carthal Anderson; Colton McCoy; Marina Horiates; Conner Patrick; Sarah Floris; Chloe French; Beth M Beadle; William H Morrison; Shirley Y Su; Carol M Lewis; Michael E Kupferman; Jason M Johnson; Heath D Skinner; Stephen Y Lai; Ehab Y Hanna; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; G Brandon Gunn Journal: Head Neck Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Ting Fa Ang; Honghuang Lin; Huitong Ding; Ning An; Rhoda Au; Sherral Devine; Sanford H Auerbach; Joseph Massaro; Prajakta Joshi; Xue Liu; Yulin Liu; Elizabeth Mahon Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Görkem Anapa; Mandy Roheger; Ümran Sema Seven; Hannah Liebermann-Jordanidis; Oezguer A Onur; Josef Kessler; Elke Kalbe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390