| Literature DB >> 25559587 |
Clarisse A Houngbedji, Prisca B N'Dri, Eveline Hürlimann, Richard B Yapi, Kigbafori D Silué, Gotianwa Soro, Benjamin G Koudou, Cinthia A Acka, Serge-Brice Assi, Penelope Vounatsou, Eliézer K N'Goran, Agathe Fantodji, Jürg Utzinger, Giovanna Raso1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge on the malaria burden of school-aged children in Côte d'Ivoire. The aim of this study was to assess Plasmodium falciparum infection, malaria-related morbidity, use of preventive measures and treatment against malaria, and physical access to health structures among school-aged children across Côte d'Ivoire.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25559587 PMCID: PMC4326184 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-14-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Flow chart detailing study compliance from a national malaria survey carried out in 93 schools in Côte d’Ivoire between November 2011 and February 2012.
Figure 2Survey location map showing children’s household socioeconomic status and infection prevalence at the unit of the school. Of note, villages with health facilities are highlighted.
Results from bivariate logistic regression models on prevalence data arising from pooled results with microscopy and RDT
| Microscopy and RDT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Total | No positive (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
|
| ||||
| 5-10 | 3,486 | 2,558 (73.4) | 1.00 | |
| 11-16 | 1,636 | 1,227 (75.0) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.25) | 0.218 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 2,714 | 2,068 (76.2) | 1.00 | |
| Female | 2,408 | 1,717 (71.3) | 0.78 (0.69, 0.88) | <0.001* |
|
| ||||
| 1 | 1,076 | 897 (83.4) | 1.00 | |
| 2 | 1,011 | 805 (79.6) | 0.78 (0.62, 0.97) | 0.028* |
| 3 | 946 | 710 (75.1) | 0.60 (0.48, 0.75) | <0.001* |
| 4 | 966 | 648 (67.1) | 0.41 (0.33, 0.50) | <0.001* |
| 5 | 1,123 | 725 (64.6) | 0.36 (0.30, 0.45) | <0.001* |
|
| ||||
| Rural | 3,958 | 3,064 (77.4) | 1.00 | |
| Urban | 1,164 | 721 (61.9) | 0.47 (0.41, 0.55) | <0.001* |
Utilised model covariates were age, sex, socioeconomic status and setting.
*Statistically significant (p <0.05).
OR: odds ratio.
CI: confidence interval.
Socioeconomic status: from less wealthy (1) to wealthiest (5).
parasitaemia stratified by age, sex, socioeconomic status and setting, mean parasitaemia and results from bivariate negative binomial regression models on parasitaemia
| Variable | Total examined | Positive for |
| Negative binomial regression model for | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geometric mean parasitaemia | <50 | 50-499 | 500-4,999 | 5,000-49,999 | ≥50,000 | |||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | IRR (95% CI) | p-value | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 5-10 | 3,486 | 2,397 | 541.8 | 1,212 (34.8) | 979 (28.1) | 1,141 (32.7) | 151 (4.3) | 3 (0.1) | 1.00 | |
| 11-16 | 1,636 | 1,142 | 421.0 | 564 (34.5) | 539 (33.0) | 475 (29.0) | 58 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0.78 (0.67, 0.90) | 0.001* |
|
| ||||||||||
| Male | 2,714 | 1,942 | 511.3 | 875 (32.2) | 814 (30.0) | 915 (33.7) | 109 (4.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.00 | |
| Female | 2,408 | 1,597 | 485.4 | 901 (37.4) | 704 (29.2) | 701 (29.1) | 100 (4.2) | 2 (0.1) | 1 (0.87, 1.14) | 0.950 |
|
| ||||||||||
| 1 | 1,076 | 855 | 520.1 | 268 (24.9) | 357 (33.2) | 405 (37.6) | 45 (4.2) | 1 (0.1) | 1.00 | |
| 2 | 1,011 | 755 | 466.3 | 294 (29.1) | 342 (33.8) | 335 (33.1) | 40 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.90 (0.73, 1.11) | 0.314 |
| 3 | 946 | 664 | 515.2 | 312 (33.0) | 283 (29.9) | 313 (33.1) | 37 (3.9) | 1 (0.1) | 0.95 (0.77, 1.18) | 0.642 |
| 4 | 966 | 595 | 524.8 | 402 (41.6) | 244 (25.3) | 278 (28.8) | 42 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.81 (0.66, 1.01) | 0.061 |
| 5 | 1,123 | 670 | 475.4 | 500 (44.5) | 292 (26.0) | 285 (25.4) | 45 (4.0) | 1 (0.1) | 0.89 (0.72, 1.09) | 0.265 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Rural | 3,958 | 2,870 | 495.7 | 1,239 (31.3) | 1241 (31.4) | 1319 (33.3) | 157 (4.0) | 2 (0.1) | 1.00 | |
| Urban | 1,164 | 669 | 515.6 | 537 (46.1) | 277 (23.8) | 297 (25.5) | 52 (4.5) | 1 (0.1) | 1.02 (0.87, 1.20) | 0.800 |
*Statistically significant (p <0.05).
IRR: incidence rate ratio.
Socioeconomic status: from less wealthy (1) to wealthiest (5).
Results from multivariate regression models on infection status and parasitaemia with covariates self-reported and clinical morbidity
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic regression model | Logistic regression model with random effect | Negative binomial regression model | Negative binomial regression model with random effect | |||||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|
| ||||||||
| Headache | 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) | 0.077 | 1.09 (0.93, 1.28) | 0.300 | 1.13 (0.97, 1.33) | 0.124 | 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) | 0.136 |
| Hot body | 1.00 (0.86, 1.18) | 0.953 | 0.96 (0.81, 1.32) | 0.622 | 1.36 (1.15, 1.61) | <0.001* | 1.01 (0.94, 1.10) | 0.758 |
| Abdominal pain | 1.14 (0.99, 1.32) | 0.078 | 1.10 (0.95, 1.28) | 0.216 | 0.93 (0.80, 1.09) | 0.401 | 1.07 (1.00, 1.16) | 0.053 |
| Vomiting | 1.25 (1.07, 1.45) | 0.004* | 1.30 (1.11, 1.52) | 0.001* | 1.24 (1.05, 1.45) | 0.010* | 1.16 (1.08, 1.25) | <0.001* |
| Fatigue | 1.00 (0.87, 1.16) | 0.952 | 1.01 (0.87, 1.18) | 0.854 | 0.90 (0.78, 1.05) | 0.185 | 1.01 (0.94, 1.08) | 0.855 |
| Loss of appetite | 0.96 (0.83, 1.12) | 0.608 | 0.95 (0.81, 1.12) | 0.540 | 0.85 (0.73, 1.00) | 0.046* | 0.96 (0.89, 1.03) | 0.245 |
| Malaria | 0.82 (0.70, 0.95) | 0.011* | 0.80 (0.67, 0.94) | 0.008* | 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) | 0.984 | 0.89 (0.82, 0.96) | 0.004* |
|
| ||||||||
| Fever | 1.04 (0.61, 1.79) | 0.881 | 1.03 (0.58, 1.82) | 0.928 | 3.31 (1.88, 5.81) | <0.001* | 1.35 (1.05, 1.73) | 0.020* |
| Anaemia | 1.55 (1.34, 1.80) | <0.001* | 1.64 (1.40, 1.93) | <0.001* | 1.36 (1.17, 1.58) | <0.001* | 1.24 (1.16, 1.33) | <0.001* |
*Statistically significant (p <0.05).
OR: odds ratio.
IRR: incidence rate ratio.
Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status and setting.
Results from multivariate regression models on infection status and parasitaemia with covariates on prevention and treatment against malaria, and distance to nearest health facility
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic regression model | Logistic regression model with random effect | Negative binomial regression model | Negative binomial regression model with random effect | |||||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|
| ||||||||
| Bed net ownership | 1.01 (0.85, 1.20) | 0.911 | 0.97 (0.81, 1.16) | 0.747 | 0.88 (0.73, 1.05) | 0.155 | 1.00 (0.92, 1.09) | 0.958 |
| Children sleeping under a net | 0.99 (0.76, 1.29) | 0.950 | 1.03 (0.78, 1.37) | 0.814 | 1.09 (0.83, 1.44) | 0.545 | 1.04 (0.91, 1.19) | 0.529 |
| Children slept under a net last night | 0.99 (0.76, 1.28) | 0.936 | 0.90 (0.69, 1.18) | 0.449 | 0.98 (0.74, 1.29) | 0.881 | 0.95 (0.83, 1.08) | 0.447 |
|
| ||||||||
| Fumigating coil | 1.14 (0.99, 1.32) | 0.074 | 1.20 (1.03, 1.40) | 0.018* | 1.06 (0.91, 1.24) | 0.459 | 1.09 (1.01, 1.17) | 0.029* |
| Insecticide spray | 0.78 (0.68, 0.90) | 0.001* | 0.83 (0.71, 0.97) | 0.017* | 0.95 (0.81, 1.12) | 0.570 | 0.84 (0.78, 0.91) | <0.001* |
| Smoke by burning leaves | 1.26 (1.07, 1.49) | 0.006* | 1.26 (1.05, 1.51) | 0.013* | 1.06 (0.90, 1.26) | 0.478 | 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) | 0.168 |
|
| 0.85 (0.72, 1.00) | 0.051 | 0.83 (0.70, 0.99) | 0.036* | 0.97 (0.81, 1.17) | 0.775 | 0.93 (0.85, 1.02) | 0.112 |
|
| ||||||||
| <1 km | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 1-5 km | 0.76 (0.61, 0.94) | 0.012* | 0.80 (0.49, 1.29) | 0.357 | 0.71 (0.57, 0.90) | 0.005* | 0.96 (0.85, 1.08) | 0.451 |
| >5 km | 0.77 (0.64, 0.92) | 0.005* | 0.78 (0.52, 1.16) | 0.219 | 0.80 (0.66, 0.96) | 0.019* | 0.86 (0.78, 0.94) | 0.002* |
*Statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Distance to nearest health facility (<1 km as reference).
OR: odds ratio.
IRR: incidence rate ratio.
Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status and setting.
Random effects were introduced for school location.