Literature DB >> 25558638

The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients.

Semih Arici1, Serkan Karaman, Serkan Doğru, Tuğba Karaman, Hakan Tapar, Asker Zeki Özsoy, Ziya Kaya, Mustafa Süren'.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway. Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 obstetric patients were divided into 2 groups, orotracheally intubated with either the McGrath video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation times, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates were compared among the groups.
RESULTS: Intubation time in the McGrath video laryngoscope group was significantly longer than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group (P <0.01). The percentage of glottic opening was found to be higher in the McGrath video laryngoscope group (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25558638     DOI: 10.3906/sag-1306-71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Med Sci        ISSN: 1300-0144            Impact factor:   0.973


  9 in total

1.  [Comparison of safe duration of apnea and intubation time in face mask ventilation with air versus 100% oxygen during induction of general anesthesia].

Authors:  Zi-Jia Li; Kun Lu; Kai Wang; Ying-Yin Zhao; Xia Huang; San-Qing Jin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 2.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Gurleen Kaur; Sunana Gupta; Nandita Mehta; Jatanbir Singh Dhingra
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2020-06-22

4.  Comparison of aerosol box intubation with C-MAC video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy-A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nitu Puthenveettil; Sajan Rahman; Sundeep Vijayaraghavan; Sneha Suresh; Dilesh Kadapamannil; Jerry Paul
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 5.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

6.  Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  M C Mushambi; S M Kinsella; M Popat; H Swales; K K Ramaswamy; A L Winton; A C Quinn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Comparison of the McGrath video laryngoscope and macintosh direct laryngoscope in obstetric patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Melike Korkmaz Toker; Basak Altıparmak; Ayse Gul Karabay
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Comparison of direct laryngoscope and McGrath videolaryngoscope in terms of glottic view and hemodynamics in bariatric surgery

Authors:  Mehmet Çakir; Erhan Özyurt
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.925

Review 9.  Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Juncheol Lee; Youngsuk Cho; Wonhee Kim; Kyu-Sun Choi; Bo-Hyoung Jang; Hyungoo Shin; Chiwon Ahn; Jae Guk Kim; Min Kyun Na; Tae Ho Lim; Dong Won Kim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.