Literature DB >> 25558318

Mid-term results of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Masashi Uehara1, Jun Takahashi1, Keijiro Mukaiyama1, Shugo Kuraishi1, Masayuki Shimizu1, Shota Ikegami1, Toshimasa Futatsugi1, Nobuhide Ogihara1, Hiroyuki Hashidate1, Hiroki Hirabayashi1, Hiroyuki Kato1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate mid-term results of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation for cervical instability. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: CPS fixation has widely used in the treatment of cervical spinal instability from various causes; however, there are few reports on mid-term surgical results of CPS fixation.
METHODS: Record of 19 patients who underwent cervical and/or upper thoracic (C2-T1) pedicle screw fixation for cervical instability was reviewed. The mean observation period was 90.2 months. Evaluated items included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and C2-7 lordotic angle before surgery and at 5 years after surgery. Postoperative computerized tomography was used to determine the accuracy of screw placement. Visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain and radiological evidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) at the 5-year follow-up were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean JOA score was significantly improved from 9.0 points before surgery to 12.8 at 5 years after surgery (p=0.001). The C2-7 lordotic angle of the neutral position improved from 6.4° to 7.8° at 5 years after surgery, but this was not significant. The major perforation rate was 5.0%. There were no clinically significant complications such as vertebral artery injury, spinal cord injury, or nerve root injury caused by any screw perforation. Mean VAS for neck pain was 49.4 at 5 years after surgery. The rate of ASD was 21.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our mid-term results showed that CPS fixation was useful for treating cervical instability. Severe complications were prevented with the assistance of a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent segment degeneration; Cervical instability; Cervical pedicle screw; Mid-term results

Year:  2014        PMID: 25558318      PMCID: PMC4278981          DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.6.759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Spine J        ISSN: 1976-1902


  30 in total

1.  Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Surgical anatomy of the cervical pedicles: landmarks for posterior cervical pedicle entrance localization.

Authors:  E E Karaikovic; S Kunakornsawat; M D Daubs; T W Madsen; R W Gaines
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-02

3.  Cervical pedicle screw placement using the "key slot technique": the feasibility and learning curve.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Ki-Tack Kim; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung Hee Lee; Kyung-Jun Park
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-12

4.  Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Go Yoshida; Zenya Ito; Akio Muramoto; Shuichiro Ohno
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-11

5.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a gutter entry point at the transitional area between the lateral mass and lamina.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Tofuku; Hiroaki Koga; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study.

Authors:  S Imagama; Y Matsuyama; Y Yukawa; N Kawakami; M Kamiya; T Kanemura; N Ishiguro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

7.  Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints.

Authors:  Jeb McAviney; Dan Schulz; Richard Bock; Deed E Harrison; Burt Holland
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Evaluation of neck pain by using a visual analog scale before and after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy: relationship with clinical results.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ara; Haku Iizuka; Yasunori Sorimachi; Yoichi Iizuka; Takashi Nakajima; Masahiro Nishinome; Satoshi Tsutsumi; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-06

9.  Perforation rates of cervical pedicle screw insertion by disease and vertebral level.

Authors:  Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Nobuhide Ogihara; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Shota Ikegami; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-03-04

10.  Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Tetsurou Hida; Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Junming Cao; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Safety and efficacy of lateral mass screws at C7 in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease.

Authors:  Chengmin Zhang; Qiang Zhou; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-09-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.