Literature DB >> 25557544

Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.

Alessandra S Souza1, Laura Rerko, Klaus Oberauer.   

Abstract

This article provides evidence that refreshing, a hypothetical attention-based process operating in working memory (WM), improves the accessibility of visual representations for recall. "Thinking of", one of several concurrently active representations, is assumed to refresh its trace in WM, protecting the representation from being forgotten. The link between refreshing and WM performance, however, has only been tenuously supported by empirical evidence. Here, we controlled which and how often individual items were refreshed in a color reconstruction task by presenting cues prompting participants to think of specific WM items during the retention interval. We show that the frequency with which an item is refreshed improves recall of this item from visual WM. Our study establishes a role of refreshing in recall from visual WM and provides a new method for studying the impact of refreshing on the amount of information we can keep accessible for ongoing cognition.
© 2014 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; refreshing; short-term memory; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25557544     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  20 in total

1.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The effects of refreshing and elaboration on working memory performance, and their contributions to long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Lea M Bartsch; Henrik Singmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

3.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

4.  What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Timothy J Ricker; Naomi Langerock; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Searching for serial refreshing in working memory: Using response times to track the content of the focus of attention over time.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Kyle O Hardman; Jeffrey N Rouder; Emily Roemer; Sara McAllaster; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

Review 6.  Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  A new approach to modeling the influence of image features on fixation selection in scenes.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Causes and consequences of limitations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Sean James Fallon; Nahid Zokaei; Masud Husain
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Inhibition-of-return-like effects in working memory? A preregistered replication study of Johnson et al. (2013).

Authors:  Naomi Langerock; Giuliana Sposito; Caro Hautekiet; Evie Vergauwe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues.

Authors:  Marcel Gressmann; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.