BACKGROUND: Recent efforts have focused on optimising interstage outcomes, including growth, for infants following the Norwood operation. The impact of the site of interstage care remains unclear, and it has been hypothesised that care at the surgical site may be beneficial due to greater access to resources such as nutritional support. This study evaluated the relationship between site of interstage care and weight gain in a large multicentre cohort. METHODS: Infants enrolled in the National Paediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (2008-2013) surviving up to Stage 2 were included. Change in weight-for-age z-score between Norwood discharge and Stage 2 admission was compared in those receiving care at the surgical versus non-surgical site. RESULTS: Of the 487 interstage survivors, 60% received all care at the surgical site, and 40% received care at a non-surgical site. There was no significant difference between groups in change in weight-for-age z-score: +0.36±0.96 for the surgical site group versus +0.46±1.02 for the non-surgical site group, p=0.3. Results were unchanged in multivariable analysis adjusting for differences in important baseline characteristics, duration of interstage, and home surveillance strategy. The proportion of all patients with weight-for-age z-score <-2 decreased from 40% at Norwood discharge to 29% at Stage 2, with no significant difference in change between the two groups (p=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: The site of interstage care was not associated with weight gain during the interstage period. Nearly one-third of patients overall had a weight-for-age z-score <-2 at Stage 2. Further study is required to identify methods to optimise weight gain in these patients.
BACKGROUND: Recent efforts have focused on optimising interstage outcomes, including growth, for infants following the Norwood operation. The impact of the site of interstage care remains unclear, and it has been hypothesised that care at the surgical site may be beneficial due to greater access to resources such as nutritional support. This study evaluated the relationship between site of interstage care and weight gain in a large multicentre cohort. METHODS:Infants enrolled in the National Paediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (2008-2013) surviving up to Stage 2 were included. Change in weight-for-age z-score between Norwood discharge and Stage 2 admission was compared in those receiving care at the surgical versus non-surgical site. RESULTS: Of the 487 interstage survivors, 60% received all care at the surgical site, and 40% received care at a non-surgical site. There was no significant difference between groups in change in weight-for-age z-score: +0.36±0.96 for the surgical site group versus +0.46±1.02 for the non-surgical site group, p=0.3. Results were unchanged in multivariable analysis adjusting for differences in important baseline characteristics, duration of interstage, and home surveillance strategy. The proportion of all patients with weight-for-age z-score <-2 decreased from 40% at Norwood discharge to 29% at Stage 2, with no significant difference in change between the two groups (p=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: The site of interstage care was not associated with weight gain during the interstage period. Nearly one-third of patients overall had a weight-for-age z-score <-2 at Stage 2. Further study is required to identify methods to optimise weight gain in these patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
CHD; Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; Norwood; interstage; quality improvement
Authors: Clifford L Cua; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Roozbeh Taeed; Timothy M Hoffman; Lillian Lai; John Hayes; Peter C Laussen; Timothy F Feltes Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Marshall L Jacobs; Megan Daniel; Constantine Mavroudis; David L S Morales; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Charles D Fraser; Joseph W Turek; John E Mayer; Christo Tchervenkov; John Conte Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Karen Uzark; Yu Wang; Nancy Rudd; E Marsha Elixson; Jennifer Strawn; Jo Ann Nieves; Cathy Smith; Sandra Staveski; Patricia O'Brien; Elizabeth Tong; Richard Ittenbach Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Jeffrey A Feinstein; D Woodrow Benson; Anne M Dubin; Meryl S Cohen; Dawn M Maxey; William T Mahle; Elfriede Pahl; Juan Villafañe; Ami B Bhatt; Lynn F Peng; Beth Ann Johnson; Alison L Marsden; Curt J Daniels; Nancy A Rudd; Christopher A Caldarone; Kathleen A Mussatto; David L Morales; D Dunbar Ivy; J William Gaynor; James S Tweddell; Barbara J Deal; Anke K Furck; Geoffrey L Rosenthal; Richard G Ohye; Nancy S Ghanayem; John P Cheatham; Wayne Tworetzky; Gerard R Martin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Shaji C Menon; Rachel T McCandless; Gordon K Mack; Linda M Lambert; Molly McFadden; Richard V Williams; L Luann Minich Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Jeffrey B Anderson; Robert H Beekman; William L Border; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Philip R Khoury; Karen Uzark; Pirooz Eghtesady; Bradley S Marino Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-05-23 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Charles F Evans; John D Sorkin; Danielle S Abraham; Brody Wehman; Sunjay Kaushal; Geoffrey L Rosenthal Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 4.330