BACKGROUND: Imatinib pharmacokinetic variability and the relationship of trough concentrations with clinical outcomes have been extensively reported. Although physical methods to quantitate imatinib exist, they are not widely available for routine use. An automated homogenous immunoassay for imatinib has been developed, facilitating routine imatinib testing. METHODS: Imatinib-selective monoclonal antibodies, without substantial cross-reactivity to the N-desmethyl metabolite or N-desmethyl conjugates, were produced. The antibodies were conjugated to 200 nm particles to develop immunoassay reagents on the Beckman Coulter AU480 analyzer. These reagents were analytically validated using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Method comparison to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was conducted using 77 plasma samples collected from subjects receiving imatinib. RESULTS: The assay requires 4 µL of sample without pretreatment. The nonlinear calibration curve ranges from 0 to 3000 ng/mL. With automated sample dilution, concentrations of up to 9000 ng/mL can be quantitated. The AU480 produces the first result in 10 minutes and up to 400 tests per hour. Repeatability ranged from 2.0% to 6.0% coefficient of variation, and within-laboratory reproducibility ranged from 2.9% to 7.4% coefficient of variation. Standard curve stability was 2 weeks and on-board reagent stability was 6 weeks. For clinical samples with imatinib concentrations from 438 to 2691 ng/mL, method comparison with LC-MS/MS gave a slope of 0.995 with a y-intercept of 24.3 and a correlation coefficient of 0.978. CONCLUSIONS: The immunoassay is suitable for quantitating imatinib in human plasma, demonstrating good correlation with a physical method. Testing for optimal imatinib exposure can now be performed on routine clinical analyzers.
BACKGROUND:Imatinib pharmacokinetic variability and the relationship of trough concentrations with clinical outcomes have been extensively reported. Although physical methods to quantitate imatinib exist, they are not widely available for routine use. An automated homogenous immunoassay for imatinib has been developed, facilitating routine imatinib testing. METHODS:Imatinib-selective monoclonal antibodies, without substantial cross-reactivity to the N-desmethyl metabolite or N-desmethyl conjugates, were produced. The antibodies were conjugated to 200 nm particles to develop immunoassay reagents on the Beckman Coulter AU480 analyzer. These reagents were analytically validated using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Method comparison to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was conducted using 77 plasma samples collected from subjects receiving imatinib. RESULTS: The assay requires 4 µL of sample without pretreatment. The nonlinear calibration curve ranges from 0 to 3000 ng/mL. With automated sample dilution, concentrations of up to 9000 ng/mL can be quantitated. The AU480 produces the first result in 10 minutes and up to 400 tests per hour. Repeatability ranged from 2.0% to 6.0% coefficient of variation, and within-laboratory reproducibility ranged from 2.9% to 7.4% coefficient of variation. Standard curve stability was 2 weeks and on-board reagent stability was 6 weeks. For clinical samples with imatinib concentrations from 438 to 2691 ng/mL, method comparison with LC-MS/MS gave a slope of 0.995 with a y-intercept of 24.3 and a correlation coefficient of 0.978. CONCLUSIONS: The immunoassay is suitable for quantitating imatinib in human plasma, demonstrating good correlation with a physical method. Testing for optimal imatinib exposure can now be performed on routine clinical analyzers.
Authors: Z Li; K Goc-Szkutnicka; A J McNally; I Pilcher; S Polakowski; S Vitone; R S Wu; S J Salamone Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 1997 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: N Takahashi; H Wakita; M Miura; S A Scott; K Nishii; M Masuko; M Sakai; Y Maeda; K Ishige; M Kashimura; K Fujikawa; M Fukazawa; T Katayama; F Monma; M Narita; F Urase; T Furukawa; Y Miyazaki; N Katayama; K Sawada Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Sang Kyun Sohn; Suk Joong Oh; Byung Soo Kim; Hun Mo Ryoo; Joo Seop Chung; Young Don Joo; Soo Mee Bang; Chul Won Jung; Dong Hwan Kim; Sung Soo Yoon; Ho Kim; Hong Ghi Lee; Jong Ho Won; Yoo Hong Min; June Won Cheong; Joon Seong Park; Ki Seong Eom; Myung Soo Hyun; Min Kyoung Kim; Hawk Kim; Moo Rim Park; Jinny Park; Chul Soo Kim; Hyeoung Joon Kim; Yeo Kyeoung Kim; Eun Kyung Park; Dae Young Zang; Deog Yeon Jo; Joon Ho Moon; Seon Yang Park Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2011-04-04
Authors: George D Demetri; Yanfeng Wang; Elisabeth Wehrle; Amy Racine; Zariana Nikolova; Charles D Blanke; Heikki Joensuu; Margaret von Mehren Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stefanie L Groenland; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.953