Literature DB >> 22241698

Imatinib plasma trough levels in chronic myeloid leukaemia: results of a multicentre study CSTI571AIL11TGLIVEC.

Maya Koren-Michowitz1, Yulia Volchek, Elizabeth Naparstek, Israel Gavish, Itai Levi, Jacob M Rowe, Avichai Shimoni, Arnon Nagler.   

Abstract

Imatinib has been accepted as frontline treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), and patients generally receive doses ranging from 400 to 800 mg/day. Previous studies have demonstrated that maintaining imatinib plasma levels (IMPLs) >1000 ng/mL leads to improved responses and long-term outcomes. However, IMPLs vary among patients because of factors such as drug-drug interactions, adherence, toxicity and differential levels of expression of cellular efflux/influx proteins. In this study, IMPLs were analysed in 191 patients with CML and were compared with achievement of molecular and cytogenetic responses (CyR). IMPLs were also correlated with renal and hepatic dysfunction. Additionally, self-reported adherence was monitored. The median and mean IMPLs were 994 ng/mL and 1070 ± 686 ng/mL, respectively, with 96 patients (50%) achieving plasma levels >1000 ng/mL. Self-reported patient compliance was 98%. Patients who achieved a complete CyR (CCyR) had significantly higher IMPLs (1078 ± 545 ng/mL) than those without CyR (827 ± 323 ng/mL, p = 0.045). When grouped together, patients who achieved a CCyR or partial CyR had significantly higher IMPLs than patients who achieved a minimal CyR or did not achieve a CyR (1066 ng/mL vs 814 ng/mL, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference observed in the IMPLs between patients who achieved molecular responses (n = 177) on treatment (major molecular response, 976 ± 385 ng/mL versus complete molecular response, 1138 ± 809 ng/mL, p = 0.387). Mean IMPLs were similar in patients with or without renal or hepatic impairment. Overall, this study confirmed previous reports that higher IMPLs correlate with clinical responses and demonstrated that imatinib exposure did not differ in patients with or without liver and/or renal dysfunction. The use of IMPL testing and patient diaries may be practical tools for the management of imatinib therapy in patients with CML.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22241698     DOI: 10.1002/hon.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0278-0232            Impact factor:   5.271


  10 in total

1.  Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

Authors:  Nienke A G Lankheet; Ingrid M E Desar; Sasja F Mulder; David M Burger; Dinemarie M Kweekel; Carla M L van Herpen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka P van Erp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Practical guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors: focus on the pharmacokinetic targets.

Authors:  Huixin Yu; Neeltje Steeghs; Cynthia M Nijenhuis; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Measurement of adherence to BCR-ABL inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: current situation and future challenges.

Authors:  Lucien Noens; Marja Hensen; Izabela Kucmin-Bemelmans; Christina Lofgren; Isabelle Gilloteau; Bernard Vrijens
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  An Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay for Quantitating Imatinib Concentrations in Plasma.

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Daniel Kozo; Rebecca L Harney; Caitlin N Baldasano; Justin Jarrah; Susan M Christner; Robert Parise; Irina Baburina; Jodi B Courtney; Salvatore J Salamone
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  SLC22A1-ABCB1 haplotype profiles predict imatinib pharmacokinetics in Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Onkar Singh; Jason Yongsheng Chan; Keegan Lin; Charles Chuah Thuan Heng; Balram Chowbay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Efficacy of imatinib mesylate-based front-line therapy in pediatric chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Hyun Jin Oh; Mun Sung Cho; Jae Wook Lee; Pil-Sang Jang; Nack-Gyun Chung; Bin Cho; Hack-Ki Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 7.  Practical Recommendations for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology.

Authors:  Remy B Verheijen; Huixin Yu; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Can therapeutic drug monitoring increase the safety of Imatinib in GIST patients?

Authors:  Wei Zhuang; Jing-Dun Xie; Shan Zhou; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Yi Zhou; Xiao-Wei Sun; Xiu-Hong Yuan; Min Huang; Si Liu; Shuang Xin; Qi-Biao Su; Hai-Bo Qiu; Xue-Ding Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Assessment of Oral Chemotherapy Nonadherence in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Using Brief Measures in Community Cancer Clinics: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Glenn Mills; Glenn J Lesser; W Mark Brown; Richard Schulz; Kathryn E Weaver; Pamala A Pawloski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 10.  Biomarkers for determining the prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Kendra Sweet; Ling Zhang; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 17.388

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.