Literature DB >> 25550104

Pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt measurements using femoral heads or acetabular domes to identify centers of the hips: comparison of two methods.

Marcin Tyrakowski1, Hailong Yu, Kris Siemionow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT) measurements using the bicoxofemoral axis obtained from either femoral heads or acetabular domes on lateral digital radiographs of the spine.
METHODS: Standing lateral radiographs of the spine of patients without hip pathologies were analyzed. PI and PT were measured on 50 radiographs using the femoral heads first followed by measurements performed with the acetabular domes to define the bicoxofemoral axis. Agreement between the methods was quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and median error for a single measurement (SEM). Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of both methods of identification of bicoxofemoral axis and its impact on PI and PT measurements were tested on 31 radiographs and quantified by ICC and SEM.
RESULTS: There was an excellent agreement in PI as well as in PT between measurements performed using whether the femoral heads or the acetabular domes (ICC: 0.99; SEM: 0.56° for PI and ICC: 0.99; SEM: 0.2° for PT). Excellent intraobserver reproducibility was revealed for both methods (ICC: 0.99 and SEM: ≤0.17° for PI and ICC: 0.99; SEM: ≤0.18° for PT). Both methods presented excellent interobserver reliability (ICC: 0.99 and SEM: ≤0.54° for PI and ICC: ≥0.98; SEM: ≤0.9° for PT).
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that either the femoral heads or the acetabular domes may be used for reliable PI and PT measurements on the lateral standing long-cassette digital radiographs of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25550104     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3739-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Eric Berthonnaud; John R Dimar; Randal R Betz; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Introduction to health measurement scales.

Authors:  András P Keszei; Márta Novak; David L Streiner
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Orientation of the human sacrum: anthropological perspectives and methodological approaches.

Authors:  Smadar Peleg; Gali Dar; Bahaa Medlej; Nili Steinberg; Youssef Masharawi; Bruce Latimer; Lyman Jellema; Nathan Peled; Baruch Arensburg; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.

Authors:  John R Dimar; Leah Y Carreon; Hubert Labelle; Mladen Djurasovic; Mark Weidenbaum; Courtney Brown; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Jérôme Jund; Olivier Noseda; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5-s1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Sohrab Gollogly; Eric Berthonnaud; Hubert Labelle; Mark Weidenbaum
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  How is sagittal balance acquired during bipedal gait acquisition? Comparison of neonatal and adult pelves in three dimensions. Evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Christine Tardieu; Noémie Bonneau; Jérôme Hecquet; Christophe Boulay; Catherine Marty; Jean Legaye; Geneviève Duval-Beaupère
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 9.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, patients with congenital scoliosis, and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Hassan Ghandhari; Daniel Fadaei Fouladi; Mir Bahram Safari; Ebrahim Ameri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Influence of lower limbs discrepancy and pelvic coronal rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope.

Authors:  Piotr Janusz; Marcin Tyrakowski; Jad Bou Monsef; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  Can Hip-Knee Line Angle Distinguish the Size of Pelvic Incidence?-Development of Quick Noninvasive Assessment Tool for Pelvic Incidence Classification.

Authors:  Shota Yamada; Takeshi Ebara; Toru Uehara; Taro Matsuki; Shingo Kimura; Yuya Satsukawa; Akira Yoshihara; Kazuji Aoki; Atsushi Inada; Michihiro Kamijima
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Artificial Intelligence System for Automatic Quantitative Analysis and Radiology Reporting of Leg Length Radiographs.

Authors:  Nathan Larson; Chantal Nguyen; Bao Do; Aryan Kaul; Anna Larson; Shannon Wang; Erin Wang; Eric Bultman; Kate Stevens; Jason Pai; Audrey Ha; Robert Boutin; Michael Fredericson; Long Do; Charles Fang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.903

6.  Role of T1 Pelvic Angle in Assessing Sagittal Balance in Outpatients With Unspecific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Mingyuan Yang; Changwei Yang; Zhengfang Xu; Ziqiang Chen; Xianzhao Wei; Jian Zhao; Jie Shao; Guoyou Zhang; Yingchuan Zhao; Haijian Ni; Yushu Bai; Xiaodong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  A Sensor-Based Screening Tool for Identifying High Pelvic Mobility in Patients Due to Undergo Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xueyang Wang; Arham Qureshi; Abhinav Vepa; Usama Rahman; Arnab Palit; Mark A Williams; Richard King; Mark T Elliott
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.