Literature DB >> 25549993

Differences in xenoreactive immune response and patterns of calcification of porcine and bovine tissues in α-Gal knock-out and wild-type mouse implantation models.

Min-Seok Kim1, Saeromi Jeong1, Hong-Gook Lim1, Yong Jin Kim2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although bioprostheses are widely used in cardiovascular surgery, their durability is limited due to degeneration. Degeneration of bioprostheses limiting its clinical use results from multiple factors, and immune reaction has been considered to be one of the most important factors. The study objectives were to compare the mechanical characteristic differences of porcine and bovine prostheses, assess the differences in immune reaction among different species and tissues as well as elucidate bioprosthetic failure patterns in α-Gal knock-out (KO) and wild-type mouse implantation models.
METHODS: Six groups of different xenogeneic tissues (porcine pericardium, aortic valve, aortic wall; bovine pericardium, aortic valve and aortic wall) were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of the wild-type mouse (n = 4) and the KO mouse (n = 4) (four xenogeneic tissue segments per each mouse). Mechanical and chemical tests, including tensile strength measurement and thermal stability test for pericardial tissues and pronase test for different xenogeneic tissues, were performed before implantation. Anti-α-Gal antibody titres (IgM and IgG antibodies) were measured using serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analyses before implantation and 30, 60 and 90 days after implantation. Implanted tissues were harvested after 90 days and studied for histopathology and quantification of calcification.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tensile strength and shrinkage temperature between the porcine and bovine pericardia, although the bovine pericardia showed a greater elasticity than the porcine pericardia (elongation at tensile strength, 74.8 ± 4.5% vs 50.0 ± 8.7%, P < 0.001). Resistance towards pronase degradation was not different among the groups of tissues (Groups 1-6, 89.1 ± 7.6, 95.1 ± 1.8, 90.3 ± 5.3, 93.7 ± 3.3, 89.1 ± 2.4 and 89.1 ± 3.0%, respectively; P = 0.061). The IgM titres of the α-Gal KO mice were significantly higher at 30 days after implantation (0.71 ± 0.27 vs 1.07 ± 0.48, P = 0.004), whereas the IgG titres of the α-Gal KO mice remained higher until 60 days after implantation (at 30 days, 0.81 ± 0.07 vs 1.28 ± 0.79, P = 0.017; at 60 days, 0.54 ± 0.16 vs 1.43 ± 1.10, P = 0.045) than those of the wild-type mice. Calcium levels of tissues implanted into the α-Gal KO mice were significantly higher than those implanted into the wild-type mice regardless of tissue type (from Groups 1-6, 4.72 ± 1.75 vs 27.76 ± 22.73 μg/mg; 3.05 ± 1.04 vs 15.90 ± 6.98 μg/mg; 2.13 ± 1.48 vs 29.76 ± 30.71 μg/mg; 1.02 ± 0.53 vs 5.97 ± 1.40 μg/mg; 3.18 ± 3.41 vs 30.55 ± 66.69 μg/mg; 6.21 ± 5.56 vs 21.65 ± 17.77 μg/mg, all P ≤ 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic immune response to the α-Gal antigen may cause more severe tissue calcification in α-Gal KO mice. Removal of α-Gal antigenicity is strongly advised in xenogeneic bioprosthetic tissue implantation.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioprosthesis; Immune response; Xenotransplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25549993     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

1.  Effects of antigen removal on a porcine osteochondral xenograft for articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Steve Elder; Hudson Chenault; Paul Gloth; Katie Webb; Ruth Recinos; Emily Wright; Dalton Moran; James Butler; Abdolsamad Borazjani; Avery Cooley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Drug Therapies of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Calcification.

Authors:  Shuyu Wen; Ying Zhou; Wai Yen Yim; Shijie Wang; Li Xu; Jiawei Shi; Weihua Qiao; Nianguo Dong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  α-Gal antigen-deficient rabbits with GGTA1 gene disruption via CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Lina Wei; Yufeng Mu; Jichao Deng; Yong Wu; Ying Qiao; Kun Zhang; Xuewen Wang; Wenpeng Huang; Anliang Shao; Liang Chen; Yang Zhang; Zhanjun Li; Liangxue Lai; Shuxin Qu; Liming Xu
Journal:  BMC Genom Data       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  In vivo xenogeneic scaffold fate is determined by residual antigenicity and extracellular matrix preservation.

Authors:  Maelene L Wong; Janelle L Wong; Natalia Vapniarsky; Leigh G Griffiths
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Comparative Decellularization and Recellularization of Wild-Type and Alpha 1,3 Galactosyltransferase Knockout Pig Lungs: A Model for Ex Vivo Xenogeneic Lung Bioengineering and Transplantation.

Authors:  Joseph Platz; Nicholas R Bonenfant; Franziska E Uhl; Amy L Coffey; Tristan McKnight; Charles Parsons; Dino Sokocevic; Zachary D Borg; Ying-Wai Lam; Bin Deng; Julia G Fields; Michael DeSarno; Roberto Loi; Andrew M Hoffman; John Bianchi; Brian Dacken; Thomas Petersen; Darcy E Wagner; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.056

6.  Perigraft reaction and incorporation of porcine and bovine pericardial patches.

Authors:  Georg Schlachtenberger; Fabian Doerr; Annamaria Brezina; Hruy Menghesha; Matthias B Heldwein; Gerardus Bennink; Michael D Menger; Mohammed Moussavian; Khosro Hekmat; Thorsten Wahlers
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-19

7.  Immunological Risk Assessment of Xenogeneic Dural Patch by Comparing with Raw Material via GTKO Mice.

Authors:  Yufeng Mu; Anliang Shao; Li Shi; Bin Du; Yongjie Zhang; Jie Luo; Liming Xu; Shuxin Qu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Calcium-Dependent Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α as Key Factor in Calcification of Subdermally Implanted Aortic Valve Leaflets.

Authors:  Antonella Bonetti; Magali Contin; Federica Tonon; Maurizio Marchini; Fulvia Ortolani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  The role of antibody responses against glycans in bioprosthetic heart valve calcification and deterioration.

Authors:  Thomas Senage; Anu Paul; Thierry Le Tourneau; Imen Fellah-Hebia; Marta Vadori; Salam Bashir; Manuel Galiñanes; Tomaso Bottio; Gino Gerosa; Arturo Evangelista; Luigi P Badano; Alberto Nassi; Cristina Costa; Galli Cesare; Rizwan A Manji; Caroline Cueff de Monchy; Nicolas Piriou; Romain Capoulade; Jean-Michel Serfaty; Guillaume Guimbretière; Etienne Dantan; Alejandro Ruiz-Majoral; Guénola Coste du Fou; Shani Leviatan Ben-Arye; Liana Govani; Sharon Yehuda; Shirley Bachar Abramovitch; Ron Amon; Eliran Moshe Reuven; Yafit Atiya-Nasagi; Hai Yu; Laura Iop; Kelly Casós; Sebastián G Kuguel; Arnau Blasco-Lucas; Eduard Permanyer; Fabrizio Sbraga; Roger Llatjós; Gabriel Moreno-Gonzalez; Melchor Sánchez-Martínez; Michael E Breimer; Jan Holgersson; Susann Teneberg; Marta Pascual-Gilabert; Alfons Nonell-Canals; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Xi Chen; Rafael Mañez; Jean-Christian Roussel; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Emanuele Cozzi; Vered Padler-Karavani
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 87.241

Review 10.  Experimental and computational models for tissue-engineered heart valves: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ge Yan; Yuqi Liu; Minghui Xie; Jiawei Shi; Weihua Qiao; Nianguo Dong
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-12-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.