Joseph Platz1, Nicholas R Bonenfant1, Franziska E Uhl1, Amy L Coffey1, Tristan McKnight1, Charles Parsons1, Dino Sokocevic1, Zachary D Borg1, Ying-Wai Lam2, Bin Deng2, Julia G Fields2, Michael DeSarno3, Roberto Loi4, Andrew M Hoffman5, John Bianchi6, Brian Dacken7, Thomas Petersen8, Darcy E Wagner1,9, Daniel J Weiss1. 1. 1 Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont. 2. 2 Department of Biology and VGN Proteomics Facility, University of Vermont College of Arts and Sciences , Burlington, Vermont. 3. 3 Biostatistics Unit, University of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont. 4. 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari , Cagliari, Italy . 5. 5 Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts University , Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, Massachusetts. 6. 6 Revivicor, Inc. , Blacksburg, Virginia. 7. 7 Exemplar Genetics, Sioux Center , Iowa. 8. 8 United Therapeutics Corp., Research Triangle Park , Durham, North Carolina. 9. 9 Comprehensive Pneumonology Center, Helmholtz Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich , Munich, Germany .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A novel potential approach for lung transplantation could be to utilize xenogeneic decellularized pig lung scaffolds that are recellularized with human lung cells. However, pig tissues express several immunogenic proteins, notably galactosylated cell surface glycoproteins resulting from alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase (α-gal) activity, that could conceivably prevent effective use. Use of lungs from α-gal knock out (α-gal KO) pigs presents a potential alternative and thus comparative de- and recellularization of wild-type and α-gal KO pig lungs was assessed. METHODS: Decellularized lungs were compared by histologic, immunohistochemical, and mass spectrometric techniques. Recellularization was assessed following compartmental inoculation of human lung bronchial epithelial cells, human lung fibroblasts, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (all via airway inoculation), and human pulmonary vascular endothelial cells (CBF) (vascular inoculation). RESULTS: No obvious differences in histologic structure was observed but an approximate 25% difference in retention of residual proteins was determined between decellularized wild-type and α-gal KO pig lungs, including retention of α-galactosylated epitopes in acellular wild-type pig lungs. However, robust initial recellularization and subsequent growth and proliferation was observed for all cell types with no obvious differences between cells seeded into wild-type versus α-gal KO lungs. CONCLUSION: These proof of concept studies demonstrate that decellularized wild-type and α-gal KO pig lungs can be comparably decellularized and comparably support initial growth of human lung cells, despite some differences in retained proteins. α-Gal KO pig lungs are a suitable platform for further studies of xenogeneic lung regeneration.
BACKGROUND: A novel potential approach for lung transplantation could be to utilize xenogeneic decellularized pig lung scaffolds that are recellularized with human lung cells. However, pig tissues express several immunogenic proteins, notably galactosylated cell surface glycoproteins resulting from alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase (α-gal) activity, that could conceivably prevent effective use. Use of lungs from α-gal knock out (α-gal KO) pigs presents a potential alternative and thus comparative de- and recellularization of wild-type and α-gal KO pig lungs was assessed. METHODS: Decellularized lungs were compared by histologic, immunohistochemical, and mass spectrometric techniques. Recellularization was assessed following compartmental inoculation of human lung bronchial epithelial cells, human lung fibroblasts, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (all via airway inoculation), and human pulmonary vascular endothelial cells (CBF) (vascular inoculation). RESULTS: No obvious differences in histologic structure was observed but an approximate 25% difference in retention of residual proteins was determined between decellularized wild-type and α-gal KO pig lungs, including retention of α-galactosylated epitopes in acellular wild-type pig lungs. However, robust initial recellularization and subsequent growth and proliferation was observed for all cell types with no obvious differences between cells seeded into wild-type versus α-gal KO lungs. CONCLUSION: These proof of concept studies demonstrate that decellularized wild-type and α-gal KO pig lungs can be comparably decellularized and comparably support initial growth of human lung cells, despite some differences in retained proteins. α-Gal KO pig lungs are a suitable platform for further studies of xenogeneic lung regeneration.
Authors: John M Wallis; Zachary D Borg; Amanda B Daly; Bin Deng; Bryan A Ballif; Gilman B Allen; Diane M Jaworski; Daniel J Weiss Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Hui Xu; Hua Wan; Wenqi Zuo; Wendell Sun; Rick T Owens; John R Harper; David L Ayares; David J McQuillan Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Matthew W Parker; Daniel Rossi; Mark Peterson; Karen Smith; Kristina Sikström; Eric S White; John E Connett; Craig A Henke; Ola Larsson; Peter B Bitterman Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Elizabeth A Calle; Mahboobe Ghaedi; Sumati Sundaram; Amogh Sivarapatna; Michelle K Tseng; Laura E Niklason Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Darcy E Wagner; Spencer L Fenn; Nicholas R Bonenfant; Elliot R Marks; Zachary Borg; Patrick Saunders; Rachael A Floreani; Daniel J Weiss Journal: Cell Mol Bioeng Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Jonathan M Charest; Tatsuya Okamoto; Kentaro Kitano; Atsushi Yasuda; Sarah E Gilpin; Douglas J Mathisen; Harald C Ott Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Paolo Cravedi; Samira Farouk; Andrea Angeletti; Lauren Edgar; Riccardo Tamburrini; Jerome Duisit; Laura Perin; Giuseppe Orlando Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Juan J Uriarte; Franziska E Uhl; Sara E Rolandsson Enes; Robert A Pouliot; Daniel J Weiss Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Kritika S Katiyar; Justin C Burrell; Franco A Laimo; Kevin D Browne; John R Bianchi; Anneke Walters; David L Ayares; Douglas H Smith; Zarina S Ali; Harry C Ledebur; D Kacy Cullen Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 4.080
Authors: Maxime Vermeulen; Federico Del Vento; Francesca de Michele; Jonathan Poels; Christine Wyns Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Sean M Wrenn; Ethan D Griswold; Franziska E Uhl; Juan J Uriarte; Heon E Park; Amy L Coffey; Jacob S Dearborn; Bethany A Ahlers; Bin Deng; Ying-Wai Lam; Dryver R Huston; Patrick C Lee; Darcy E Wagner; Daniel J Weiss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.240