| Literature DB >> 25549096 |
Matthieu Delannoy1, Jessica Schwarz1, Agnès Fournier1, Guido Rychen1, Cyril Feidt1.
Abstract
Young children with their hand-to-mouth activity may be exposed to contaminated soils. However few studies assessing exposure of organic compounds sequestrated in soil were realized. The present study explores the impact of different organic matters on retention of NDL-PCBs during digestive processes using commercial humic substances in a close digestive model of children: the piglet. Six artificial soils were used. One standard soil, devoid of organic matter, and five amended versions of this standard soil with either fulvic acid, humic acid, Sphagnum peat, activated carbon or a mix of Sphagnum peat and activated carbon (95∶5) (SPAC) were prepared. In order to compare the different treatments, we use spiked oil and negative control animals. Forty male piglets were randomly distributed in 7 contaminated and one control groups (n = 5 for each group). During 10 days, the piglets were fed artificial soil or a corn oil spiked with 19,200 ng of Aroclor 1254 per g of dry matter (6,000 ng.g⁻¹ of NDL-PCBs) to achieve an exposure dose of 1,200 ng NDL-PCBs.Kg⁻¹ of body weight per day. NDL-PCBs in adipose tissue were analyzed by GC-MS. Fulvic acid reduced slightly the bioavailability of NDL-PCBs compared to oil. Humic acid and Sphagnum peat reduced it significantly higher whereas activated carbon reduced the most. Piglets exposed to soil containing both activated carbon and Shagnum peat exhibited a lower reduction than soil with only activated carbon. Therefore, treatment groups are ordered by decreasing value of relative bioavailability as following: oil ≥ fulvic acid>Sphagnum peat ≥ Sphagnum peat and activated carbon ≥ Humic acid>>activated carbon. This suggests competition between Sphagnum peat and activated carbon. The present study highlights that quality of organic matter does have a significant effect on bioavailability of sequestrated organic compounds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25549096 PMCID: PMC4280112 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Animal management and experimental design of the study.
Composition of the different artificial soils and treatment of the experiment.
| Corn Oil | Sand | Kaolin | Fulvic acid | Humic acid |
| Activated carbon | Aroclor1254 | Time of maturation | |
| (Sigma-aldrich, StLouis, USA) | See Sand (Carl RothGmbH, Karlsruhe,Germany) | (Sigma-aldrich,St Louis, USA) | Swanee River FAstandard I (IHSS,St Paul, USA) | (Sigma-aldrich,St Louis, USA) | (Sphagnum peat mossfrom baltic countries,Verve, France) | Activated charcoal 242276(Sigma-aldrich,St Louis, USA) | Concentration(µg.g−1 of DM)(Sigma-aldrich, Supelco) | in days | |
| Spiked corn oil (SO) | 100% | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19.2 | – |
| Standard soil (SS) | – | 77.80% | 22.20% | – | – | – | – | 19.2 | 21 |
| Fulvic acid (FA) | – | 76.20% | 21.90% | 1.92% | – | – | – | 19.2 | 21 |
| Sphagnum peat (SP) | – | 76.00% | 21.70% | – | – | 2.33% | – | 19.2 | 21 |
| Humic Acid (HA) | – | 75.80% | 21.70% | – | 2.56% | – | – | 19.2 | 21 |
| Sphagum peat andactivated carbon (SPAC) | – | 75.80% | 21.70% | – | – | 2.38% | 0.05% | 19.2 | 21 |
| Activated carbon (AC) | – | 77.70% | 22.20% | – | – | – | 0.05% | 19.2 | 21 |
| Negative controls (NC) | – | 77.80% | 22.20% | – | – | – | – | – | 21 |
Figure 2Concentrations (ng.g−1 of fat) of NDL-PCBs in adipose tissue.
Each value represents the adjusted mean ± standard error. Values are presented following treatment groups: Spiked corn oil (SO, n = 5); Standard soil without organic matter (SS, n = 4); 1% OC Fulvic acid soil (FA, n = 4); 1% OC Sphagnum peat soil (SP, n = 5); 1% OC Sphagnum peat soil; Activated Carbon (95∶5) (SPAC, n = 5); 1% OC Humic acid soil (HA, n = 5); 1% Activated carbon (AC, n = 5); Negative controls (NC, n = 5). Letters (a, b, c, d, e, f) indicate values that do not statistically differ from other values within groups presenting a common letter (P<0.05).
Relative bioavailability (RBA) factors of NDL-PCBs.
| PCB 52 | PCB 101 | PCB 138 | PCB 153 | PCB 180 | LSMEANS PCB | |||||||
| Spiked corn oil (SO) |
| [88.4 −112] |
| [88.4 −112] |
| [88.4 −112] |
| [88.4 −112] |
| [88.4 −112] |
| [91.6 −109] |
| Standard soil (SS) |
| [66.6 −92.7] |
| [69.0 −95.0] |
| [73.3 −99.3] |
| [78.3 −104] |
| [99.8 −126] |
| [81.0 −99.9] |
| Fulvic acid (FA) |
| [50.8 −76.9] |
| [66.9 −92.9] |
| [65.3 −91.3] |
| [83.0 −109] |
| [82.5 −109] |
| [73.3 −92.2] |
| Sphagnum peat (SP) |
| [45.1 −68.4] |
| [46.0 −69.3] |
| [51.1 −74.4] |
| [42.3 −65.5] |
| [62.9 −86.2] |
| [52.7 −69.6] |
| Humic Acid (HA) |
| [30.0 −53.2] |
| [27.9 −51.2] |
| [32.0 −55.3] |
| [28.5 −51.8] |
| [56.4 −79.7] |
| [38.2 −55.1] |
| Sphagum peat andactivated carbon (SPAC) |
| [23.0 −46.3] |
| [26.0 −49.3] |
| [32.2 −55.5] |
| [29.7 −53.0] |
| [42.7 −66.0] |
| [33.9 −50.8] |
| Activated carbon (AC) |
| [−3.0 −22.3] |
| [−0.7 −22.6] |
| [2.7 −26.0] |
| [4.1 −27.4] |
| [21.0 −44.3] |
| [8.2 −25.1] |
| Negative controls (NC) |
| [−9.4 −15.9] |
| [−9.2 −14.1] |
| [−7.1 −16.2] |
| [−6.3 −17.0] |
| [−0.3 −23.0] |
| [−3.1 −13.9] |
|
|
| [44.5 −52.9] |
| [47.2 −55.3] |
| [50.2 −58.3] |
| [51.4 −59.5] |
| [64.6 −72.7] | ||
| Residual | 0.010 | OM effect: | p<0.001 | |||||||||
| RMSE | 0.13 | PCB effect: | p<0.001 | |||||||||
| PCB*OM: | p = 0.050 | |||||||||||
RBA factors were calculated from adjusted means of concentrations (ng.g−1 of fat). Values in brackets indicates 95% confidence interval (2xSE). SE were calculated via propagation of errors formula.
Multivariate analysis was performed using GLM procedure on RBA values 95% confidence interval (2xSE) was calculated.
Organic matter effect: letters (a, b, c, d, e, f) indicate values that do not statistically differ from other values within column presenting a common letter (P<0.05).
NDL-PCBs effect: letters (A, B) indicate values that do not statistically differ from other values within line presenting a common letter (P<0.05).
RMSE: Root means square error.
Figure 3Mechanistic approach of retention and bioavailability of NDL-PCBs bound to OM.