Literature DB >> 24168448

Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury.

Jose L Gomez-Eyles1, Carmen Yupanqui, Barbara Beckingham, Georgia Riedel, Cynthia Gilmour, Upal Ghosh.   

Abstract

In situ amendment of activated carbon (AC) to sediments can effectively reduce the bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants. While biochars have been suggested as low-cost and sustainable alternatives to ACs, there are few comparative sorption data especially for mercury (Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) at the low porewater concentrations in sediments. Here we compare the ability of a wide range of commercially available and laboratory synthesized ACs and biochars to sorb PAHs, PCBs, DDTs, inorganic Hg, and MeHg at environmentally relevant concentrations. Compared to natural organic matter, sorption capacity for most organic compounds was at least 1-2 orders of magnitude higher for unactivated biochars and 3-4 orders of magnitude higher for ACs which translated to sediment porewater PCB concentration reductions of 18-80% for unactivated biochars, and >99% for ACs with 5% by weight amendment to sediment. Steam activated carbons were more effective than biochars in Hg sorption and translated to modeled porewater Hg reduction in the range of 94-98% for sediments with low native Kd and 31-73% for sediments with high native Kd values for Hg. Unactivated biochars were as effective as the steam activated carbons for MeHg sorption. Predicted reductions of porewater MeHg were 73-92% for sediments with low native Kd and 57-86% for sediment with high native K(d). ACs with high surface areas therefore are likely to be effective in reducing porewater concentrations of organics, Hg, and MeHg in impacted sediments. Unactivated biochars had limited effectiveness for organics and Hg but can be considered when MeHg exposure is the primary concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24168448     DOI: 10.1021/es403712q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Effect of activated carbon and biochars on the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different industrially contaminated soils.

Authors:  Michał Kołtowski; Isabel Hilber; Thomas D Bucheli; Patryk Oleszczuk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Uptake Mechanisms of a Novel, Activated Carbon-Based Equilibrium Passive Sampler for Estimating Porewater Methylmercury.

Authors:  Spencer J Washburn; Jada Damond; James P Sanders; Cynthia C Gilmour; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.218

3.  Immobilization of heavy metals in electroplating sludge by biochar and iron sulfide.

Authors:  Honghong Lyu; Yanyan Gong; Jingcshun Tang; Yao Huang; Qilin Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Assimilation efficiency of sediment-bound PCBs ingested by fish impacted by strong sorption.

Authors:  Hilda Fadaei; Ernest Williams; Allen R Place; John P Connolly; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Bioturbation effects on heavy metals fluxes from sediment treated with activated carbon.

Authors:  Bin Men; Yi He; Xiaofang Yang; Jian Meng; Fei Liu; Dongsheng Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Synthesis and evaluation of Fe3O4-impregnated activated carbon for dioxin removal.

Authors:  Yao-Jen Tu; Gnanasiri S Premachandra; Stephen A Boyd; J Brett Sallach; Hui Li; Brian J Teppen; Cliff T Johnston
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Development of a Novel Equilibrium Passive Sampling Device for Methylmercury in Sediment and Soil Porewaters.

Authors:  James P Sanders; Alyssa McBurney; Cynthia C Gilmour; Grace E Schwartz; Spencer Washburn; Susan B Kane Driscoll; Steven S Brown; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 8.  In situ sediment treatment using activated carbon: a demonstrated sediment cleanup technology.

Authors:  Clayton R Patmont; Upal Ghosh; Paul LaRosa; Charles A Menzie; Richard G Luthy; Marc S Greenberg; Gerard Cornelissen; Espen Eek; John Collins; John Hull; Tore Hjartland; Edward Glaza; John Bleiler; James Quadrini
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.992

9.  Effects of standard humic materials on relative bioavailability of NDL-PCBs in juvenile swine.

Authors:  Matthieu Delannoy; Jessica Schwarz; Agnès Fournier; Guido Rychen; Cyril Feidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.