| Literature DB >> 25548428 |
Nasser Attia Elhawary1, Neda Bogari2, Essam Hussien Jiffri3, Mona Rashad4, Abdulhamid Fatani5, Mohammed Tayeb2.
Abstract
We evaluated whether TAP1-rs1135216 (p.637D>G) and PSMB9-rs17587 (p.60R>H) were significantly associated with the risk and severity of vitiligo among Saudi patients. One hundred seventy-two subjects were genotyped for the TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 variants using endonuclease digestions of amplified genomic DNA. The TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 mutant alleles were strongly associated with vitiligo, with odds ratios showing five fold and two fold risks (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.007, resp.). In TAP1-rs1135216, the 637G mutant allele was more frequent in cases (74%) than in healthy controls. In cases, the 60H mutant allele PSMB9-rs17587 was less frequent (42%) than the wild-type 60R allele (58%). Vitiligo vulgaris was the most common type of disease, associated with the DG (55%) and GG (46%) genotypes for rs1135216 and with the RH genotype (59%) for rs17587. The heterozygous 637DG and 60RH genotypes were each linked with active phenotypes in 64% of cases. In conclusion, the TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 variants are significantly associated with vitiligo, and even one copy of these mutant alleles can influence the risk among Saudis. Vitiligo vulgaris is associated with genotypes containing the mutant G and H alleles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25548428 PMCID: PMC4273470 DOI: 10.1155/2014/260732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Demographic and clinical features of vitiligo patients (n = 86).
| Characteristic | Number (%)a |
|
|---|---|---|
| Average age (mean ± SD) | ||
| At onset (range) | 11.5 ± 10.1 y (2–47 y) | 6.0 ( |
| (9.3–13.7) | ||
| At examination (range) | 22.0 ± 12.6 y (2–50 y) | 12.5 ( |
| (19.3–24.7) | ||
| Ratio of women : men | 1 : 1 | |
| Family history | 34/86 (39.5) | 12.3 (<0.0001) |
| Consanguinity | 14/86 (16.3) | 4.8 (<0.0001) |
| Progressive/stabled | 48 (66.7)/24 (33.3) | 24.0 (<0.0001) |
| Sensitivity to sun | 43/86 (50) | 19.1 (<0.0001) |
| Thyroid pathology (hypo) | 14/86 (16.3) | 4.8 (<0.0001) |
| Diabetes mellitus type 1 | 5/86 (5.8) | 0.34 (0.73) |
| Early graying of hair | 24/86 (27.9) | 10.3 (<0.0001) |
| Halo nevie | 5/18 (27.8) | 10.0 (<0.0001) |
aNumbers in parentheses are expressed in percentages unless otherwise stated.
bAll values are expressed in terms of z-test unless otherwise stated.
cValues are expressed in terms of t-test.
d14 cases could not be clinically followed up.
eOnly 18 of 86 cases were investigated for halo nevi.
Stratification of TAP1-D637G and PSMB9-R60H genotypes associated with different clinical types of vitiligo.
| Vitiligo type | Number of cases (%) |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| DD | DG | GG | RR | RH | HH | ||
| VV | 44 (51.2) | 0 (0.0) | 24 (54.5) | 20 (45.5) | 10 (22.7) | 26 (59.1) | 8 (18.2) |
| UV | 6 (7.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) |
| FV | 18 (20.9) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | 6 (33.3) | 10 (55.6) | 2 (11.1) |
| AV | 16 (18.6) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 6 (37.5) | 8 (50.0) | 2 (12.5) |
| SV | 2 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100) | 0 (0.0) |
AV: acral/acrofacial vitiligo; FV: focal vitiligo; SV: segmental vitiligo; UV: universalis vitiligo; VV: vulgaris vitiligo.
*“n” is the number of genotypes in TAP1 or PSMB9 variants.
TAP1-D637G and PSMB9-R60H genotype distribution and allelic frequencies for active versus stable vitiligo phenotypes.
| Phenotype | Number of cases (%) |
| Alleles |
| Allele | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| DD | DG | GG | D | G | RR | RH | HH | R | H | ||
| Active | 52 (60.5) | 0 (0.0) | 33 (63.5) | 19 (36.5) | 33 (0.32) | 71 (0.68) | 9 (17.3) | 33 (63.5) | 10 (19.2) | 51 (0.49) | 53 (0.51) |
| Stable | 34 (39.5) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (29.4) | 24 (70.6) | 10 (0.15) | 58 (0.85) | 5 (14.7) | 24 (70.6) | 5 (14.7) | 34 (0.50) | 34 (0.50) |
|
| |||||||||||
| OR = 0.66, 95% (CI, 0.01–33.9), | OR = 2.70, 95% (CI, 1.2–5.9), | OR = 1.2, 95% (CI, 0.4–4.0), | OR = 1.0, 95% (CI, 0.5–1.8), | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
a TAP1-D637G genotype differences between progressive and stable vitiligo cases.
b P > 0.05 = no significant difference.
c P < 0.05 = a significant difference.
| Allele | Vitiligo patients | Controls | OR |
| 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| D | 44 (0.26) | 110 (0.64) | 5.2 | 7.0 (<0.0001) | 3.2–8.2 |
| G | 128 (0.74) | 62 (0.36) | |||
| R | 100 (0.58) | 124 (0.72) | 1.86 | 2.7 (0.007) | 1.2–2.9 |
| H | 72 (0.42) | 48 (0.28) |
| Genotype |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| DD | 0 (00.0) | 24 (27.9) | 16.2 (<0.0001) |
| DG | 44 (51.2) | 62 (72.1) | |
| GG | 42 (48.8) | 0 (00.0) | |
| (DG + GG) | 86 (100) | 62 (72.1) | |
|
| |||
| RR | 26 (30.2) | 44 (51.1) | 4.5 (0.03) |
| RH | 48 (55.8) | 36 (41.9) | |
| HH | 12 (14.0) | 6 (7.0) | |
| (RH + HH) | 60 (69.8) | 42 (48.9) |