BACKGROUND: Clear aligner treatment (CAT) has been cited as a safe and comfortable orthodontic procedure for adult patients. However, the available evidence is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the existing literature in order to assess periodontal health during CAT. SEARCH METHODS AND SELECTION CRITERIA: Pubmed, Pubmed Central, National Library of Medicine's Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical trials, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Google Scholar, and LILACS were searched from January 1945 to September 2014 to identify all peer-reviewed papers potentially relevant to the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: After duplicate selection and extraction procedures, the risk of bias was assessed according to the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination criteria, and a 3-point grading system, as described by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), was used to rate the methodological quality of the selected papers. A PICOS table was used for data extraction. RESULTS: Five relevant articles were selected from the 1247 identified articles. The level of evidence was moderate for all the studies. A significant improvement of the periodontal health indexes was revealed, in particular when CAT was compared to fixed appliances. No periodontal CAT adverse effects were observed in the selected studies. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal health indexes were significantly improved during CAT. The results of this review should be interpreted with some caution because of the number, quality, and heterogeneity of the included studies.
BACKGROUND: Clear aligner treatment (CAT) has been cited as a safe and comfortable orthodontic procedure for adult patients. However, the available evidence is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the existing literature in order to assess periodontal health during CAT. SEARCH METHODS AND SELECTION CRITERIA: Pubmed, Pubmed Central, National Library of Medicine's Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical trials, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Google Scholar, and LILACS were searched from January 1945 to September 2014 to identify all peer-reviewed papers potentially relevant to the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: After duplicate selection and extraction procedures, the risk of bias was assessed according to the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination criteria, and a 3-point grading system, as described by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), was used to rate the methodological quality of the selected papers. A PICOS table was used for data extraction. RESULTS: Five relevant articles were selected from the 1247 identified articles. The level of evidence was moderate for all the studies. A significant improvement of the periodontal health indexes was revealed, in particular when CAT was compared to fixed appliances. No periodontal CAT adverse effects were observed in the selected studies. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal health indexes were significantly improved during CAT. The results of this review should be interpreted with some caution because of the number, quality, and heterogeneity of the included studies.
Authors: Amalia Cong; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Sandra Khong Tai; Charlene Tai Loh; Mary Barkley; Marilia Yatabe; Marco Caminiti; Camila Massaro; Jonas Bianchi; Romain Deleat-Besson; Celia Le; Juan Carlos Prieto; Najla N Al Turkestani; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Giovanna Perrotti; Alessandro Carrafiello; Ornella Rossi; Lorena Karanxha; Giulia Baccaglione; Massimo Del Fabbro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Rui Albuquerque; Zahid Khan; Ana Poveda; Jonathan Higham; Andrea Richards; Luis Monteiro; Enric Jané-Salas; José Lopez-Lopez; Saman Warnakulasuriya Journal: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Date: 2016-01-01