Literature DB >> 25548053

Accumulation of reserve carbohydrate by rumen protozoa and bacteria in competition for glucose.

Bethany L Denton1, Leanne E Diese1, Jeffrey L Firkins2, Timothy J Hackmann3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if rumen protozoa could form large amounts of reserve carbohydrate compared to the amounts formed by bacteria when competing for glucose in batch cultures. We separated large protozoa and small bacteria from rumen fluid by filtration and centrifugation, recombined equal protein masses of each group into one mixture, and subsequently harvested (reseparated) these groups at intervals after glucose dosing. This method allowed us to monitor reserve carbohydrate accumulation of protozoa and bacteria individually. When mixtures were dosed with a moderate concentration of glucose (4.62 or 5 mM) (n = 2 each), protozoa accumulated large amounts of reserve carbohydrate; 58.7% (standard error of the mean [SEM], 2.2%) glucose carbon was recovered from protozoal reserve carbohydrate at time of peak reserve carbohydrate concentrations. Only 1.7% (SEM, 2.2%) was recovered in bacterial reserve carbohydrate, which was less than that for protozoa (P < 0.001). When provided a high concentration of glucose (20 mM) (n = 4 each), 24.1% (SEM, 2.2%) of glucose carbon was recovered from protozoal reserve carbohydrate, which was still higher (P = 0.001) than the 5.0% (SEM, 2.2%) glucose carbon recovered from bacterial reserve carbohydrate. Our novel competition experiments directly demonstrate that mixed protozoa can sequester sugar away from bacteria by accumulating reserve carbohydrate, giving protozoa a competitive advantage and stabilizing fermentation in the rumen. Similar experiments could be used to investigate the importance of starch sequestration.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25548053      PMCID: PMC4325151          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03736-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  CONCENTRATIONS OF GLUCOSE AND LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT ACIDS IN THE RUMEN OF SHEEP CHANGED GRADUALLY FROM A HAY TO A HAY-PLUS-GRAIN DIET.

Authors:  R K RYAN
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 1.156

2.  Chemical composition of microbial matter in the rumen.

Authors:  J W Czerkawski
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 3.638

3.  Glucose transport by mixed ruminal bacteria from a cow.

Authors:  H Kajikawa; M Amari; S Masaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Bovine acidosis: implications on laminitis.

Authors:  J E Nocek
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Methane production and soluble carbohydrates in the rumen of sheep in relation to the time of feeding and the effects of short-term intraruminal infusions of unsaturated fatty acids.

Authors:  J L Clapperton; J W Czerkawski
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  A theoretical study on the amount of ATP required for synthesis of microbial cell material.

Authors:  A H Stouthamer
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Some effects of rumen ciliate protozoa in cattle given restricted amounts of a barley diet.

Authors:  F G Whitelaw; J M Eadie; S O Mann; R S Reid
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Isotrichid protozoa influence conversion of glucose to glycogen and other microbial products.

Authors:  M B Hall
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Physiological characteristics of several rumen protozoa grown in vitro with observations on within and among species variation.

Authors:  Burk A Dehority
Journal:  Eur J Protistol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Chemotaxis toward carbohydrates and peptides by mixed ruminal protozoa when fed, fasted, or incubated with polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Authors:  H L Diaz; S K R Karnati; M A Lyons; B A Dehority; J L Firkins
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  6 in total

1.  Use of a Fluorescent Analog of Glucose (2-NBDG) To Identify Uncultured Rumen Bacteria That Take Up Glucose.

Authors:  Junyi Tao; Courtney McCourt; Halima Sultana; Corwin Nelson; John Driver; Timothy J Hackmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Dietary supplements during the cold season increase rumen microbial abundance and improve rumen epithelium development in Tibetan sheep.

Authors:  Xiao Ping Jing; Quan Hui Peng; Rui Hu; Hua Wei Zou; Hong Ze Wang; Xiao Qiang Yu; Jian Wei Zhou; Allan Degen; Zhi Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Maximizing efficiency of rumen microbial protein production.

Authors:  Timothy J Hackmann; Jeffrey L Firkins
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Inhibition of the Rumen Ciliate Entodinium caudatum by Antibiotics.

Authors:  Tansol Park; Tea Meulia; Jeffrey L Firkins; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen.

Authors:  Charles J Newbold; Gabriel de la Fuente; Alejandro Belanche; Eva Ramos-Morales; Neil R McEwan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Rumen Protozoa Play a Significant Role in Fungal Predation and Plant Carbohydrate Breakdown.

Authors:  Cate L Williams; Benjamin J Thomas; Neil R McEwan; Pauline Rees Stevens; Christopher J Creevey; Sharon A Huws
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.