Literature DB >> 19458299

A randomized trial comparing conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters to straight-tip catheters with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck.

Chiu-Leong Li1, Tai-Gen Cui, Hong-Bing Gan, Kin Cheung, Weng-In Lio, Un-I Kuok.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inserting a straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter configured with a subcutaneous artificial swan neck.
DESIGN: Clinical outcomes of conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters and Tenckhoff straight-tip catheters implanted with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck were compared in a prospective randomized controlled trial in a single-center setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion were randomized to receive either a double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter with an artificial subcutaneous swan-neck (TC) or a conventional double-cuff straight-tip swan-neck catheter (SN). The primary outcome was catheter exit-site infection rate; the secondary outcomes were catheter-related mechanical events and surgery-related bleeding.
RESULTS: A total of 39 consecutive patients were enrolled: 20 into the TC group and 19 into the SN group. More exit-site infections were observed in the SN group than in the TC group, although the difference was not statistically significant (0.97 vs 0.51 episodes per patient-year, p = 0.0657). However, there were more peritonitis episodes in the TC group than in the SN group (0.35 vs 0.15 episodes per patient-year, p = 0.0256). Exit-site and main wound bleeding post surgery were generally mild and similar in the 2 groups. No events of dialysate leakage, catheter tip migration, or subcutaneous cuff protrusion were observed in patients of either group. Outflow failure due to mechanical causes occurred in 2 patients in the TC group and in 1 patient in the SN group during the intermittent peritoneal dialysis period; all were corrected successfully by laparoscopic omentectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter configured with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck appears to be an effective and safe procedure. It may be a good alternative to the conventional swan-neck catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19458299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  7 in total

1.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the right lower quadrant is associated with a lower risk of catheter tip migration: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Lei Lan; Jielong Jiang; Peng Wang; Wei Ren; Zhao Hu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter-related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Htay Htay; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Francesco Paolo Schena; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Allison Tong; Yeoungjee Cho
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-31

Review 3.  Influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complications and long-term outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stepan Michran Esagian; Dimitrios Spinos; Anastasia Vasilopoulou; Nikolaos Syrigos; Muath Bishawi; Ruediger Wilhelm Lehrich; John Paul Middleton; Paul Vincent Suhocki; Theodore Nick Pappas; Konstantinos P Economopoulos
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  Risk factors associated with brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity among peritoneal dialysis patients in Macao.

Authors:  Ding-Wei Kuang; Chiu-Leong Li; Un-I Kuok; Kin Cheung; Weng-In Lio; Jing Xin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Clinical application of right low-position modified peritoneal dialysis catheterization.

Authors:  Wei Ren; Wei Chen; Hui-Xuan Pan; Lei Lan; Peng Wang; Ye-Hua Huang; Ming Kong; Yan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Impact of Intra-Abdominal Adhesion on Dialysis Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Ben-Chung Cheng; Nai-Wen Tsai; Yun-Ru Lai; Chin-Cheng Huang; Cheng-Hsien Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.