Literature DB >> 25547407

Retrospective analysis of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (FGS) as salvage chemotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: inflammation-based prognostic score predicts survival.

Akiyoshi Kasuga1, Naohiro Okano, Daisuke Naruge, Hiroshi Kitamura, Atsuko Takasu, Fumio Nagashima, Junji Furuse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (FGS) in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC) and to explore independent variables associated with survival.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with GEM-refractory PC who received FGS at our institution from March 2009 to December 2013. GEM was administered by fixed dose rate intravenous infusion of 1,200 mg/m(2) as a 120-min infusion on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice a day at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) on days 1-7. Cycles were repeated every 14 days.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with GEM-refractory PC received FGS. Sixteen patients received FGS as third-line treatment. Twenty-nine patients (48 %) had a history of S-1 administration. The objective response rate was 13 %, and the disease control rate was 49 %. The median progression-free survival time was 2.7 months, and the median overall survival time was 6.0 months. Major Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (15 %), diarrhea (3 %), anorexia (2 %), and fatigue (2 %). A high inflammation-based prognostic score (modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which incorporates C-reactive protein and albumin), a performance status >0, and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level >2,000 IU/ml were independently associated with a poor outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: FGS might be effective and well tolerated as salvage chemotherapy in a practical setting. The inflammation-based prognostic score is a simple and reliable indicator of survival in the setting of salvage chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25547407     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2665-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

1.  Post-progression survival following second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Kasuga; Yasuo Hamamoto; Ayano Takeuchi; Naohiro Okano; Kazuhiro Togasaki; Yu Aoki; Takeshi Suzuki; Kenta Kawasaki; Kenro Hirata; Yasutaka Sukawa; Takanori Kanai; Hiromasa Takaishi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Systemic Inflammation in the Recovery Stage of Stroke: Its Association with Sarcopenia and Poor Functional Rehabilitation Outcomes.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yoshimura; Takahiro Bise; Fumihiko Nagano; Sayuri Shimazu; Ai Shiraishi; Makio Yamaga; Hiroaki Koga
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-05-18

3.  Prognostic Significance of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Fu; Kun Wang; Shan Yan; Xie Wang; Bo Tang; Jiang Chang; Ran Wang; Tao Wu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Retrospective analysis of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with S-1 in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer after failure of gemcitabine.

Authors:  Xiaoping Li; Kun Wang; Leizhen Zheng; Zhiqiang Meng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Biliary drainage improves the predictive value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Scores in inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Iino; Tadashi Shimoyama; Takasato Igarashi; Tomoyuki Aihara; Kentaro Ishii; Juichi Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tono; Shinsaku Fukuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predicting mortality and adverse events in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with palliative gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in a multicentre phase III randomized clinical trial: the APC-SAKK risk scores.

Authors:  Piera Gargiulo; Daniel Dietrich; Richard Herrmann; György Bodoky; Thomas Ruhstaller; Werner Scheithauer; Bengt Glimelius; Simona Berardi; Sandro Pignata; Peter Brauchli
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Sawada; Akiyoshi Kasuga; Takafumi Mie; Takaaki Furukawa; Takanobu Taniguchi; Koshiro Fukuda; Yuto Yamada; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Ryo Kanata; Masato Matsuyama; Takashi Sasaki; Masato Ozaka; Naoki Sasahira
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Prognostic and clinical significance of modified glasgow prognostic score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 4,629 patients.

Authors:  Dongdong Wu; Xingmu Wang; Ge Shi; Honggang Sun; Guoxing Ge
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.682

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.