Literature DB >> 25544263

Comparison of sugammadex and conventional reversal on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, blinded trial.

Onur Koyuncu1, Selim Turhanoglu2, Cagla Ozbakis Akkurt2, Murat Karcıoglu2, Mustafa Ozkan3, Cahit Ozer4, Daniel I Sessler5, Alparslan Turan5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the new selective binding agent sugammadex causes less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) than the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 patients scheduled for extremity surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to neostigmine (70 μg/kg) and atropine (0.4 mg per mg neostigmine) or sugammadex 2 mg/kg for neuromuscular antagonism at the end of anesthesia, when 4 twitches in response to train-of-four stimulation were visible with fade. MEASUREMENTS: We recorded PONV, recovery parameters, antiemetic consumption, and side effects. MAIN
RESULTS: Nausea and vomiting scores were lower in the sugammadex patients upon arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (med: 0 [min-max, 0-3] vs med: 0 [min-max, 0-3]; P < .05), but thereafter low and comparable. Postoperative antiemetic and analgesic consumption were similar in each group. Extubation (median [interquartile range], 3 [1-3.25] vs 4 [1-3.25]; P < .001) first eye opening (4 [3-7.25] vs 7 [5-11]; P < .001), and head lift (4 [2-7.25] vs 8 [11-25]; P < .001) in minutes were shorter in patients given sugammadex. Postoperative heart rates were significantly lower in all measured times patients given neostigmine.
CONCLUSIONS: Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking antagonism with sugammadex speeds recovery of neuromuscular strength but only slightly and transiently reduces PONV compared with neostigmine and atropine.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neostigmine; Postoperative nausea; Sugammadex; Vomiting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25544263     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  12 in total

1.  Sugammadex: Efficacy and Practicality in the Dental Office.

Authors:  Stephen Goetz; Benjamin Pritts; Bryant Cornelius
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

2.  Heart rate changes following the administration of sugammadex in children: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Mohammad Alsuhebani; Trent Sims; Jennifer K Hansen; Mohammed Hakim; Hina Walia; Rebecca Miller; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults.

Authors:  Ana-Marija Hristovska; Patricia Duch; Mikkel Allingstrup; Arash Afshari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-14

4.  Sugammadex in awakening from general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adriano Anzai; Armelin Utino; Giuliano Tosello; Haroldo Katayama; Ighor Alexander Zamuner Spir; Luca Schiliró Tristão; Mary Martins Nery; Mauricio Anhesini; Osvaldo Silvestrini Tiezzi; Patricia Rodrigues Naufal Spir; Pericles Otani; Wanderley Marques Bernado
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.712

5.  Heart Rate Changes Following the Administration of Sugammadex to Infants and Children With Comorbid Cardiac, Cardiovascular, and Congenital Heart Diseases.

Authors:  Jordan Arends; Richard Hubbard; Shabana Z Shafy; Mohammed Hakim; Stephani S Kim; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2020-08-01

6.  Effects of Sugammadex on Post-Operative Pulmonary Complications in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jiwon Han; Jung-Hee Ryu; Bon-Wook Koo; Sun Woo Nam; Sang-Il Cho; Ah-Young Oh
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Effect of prophylactic palonosetron and sugammadex on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing microvascular decompression under propofol-maintained anesthesia: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Hee Yong Kang; Sung Wook Park; Sangho Lee; Jong-Mi Jeon; In Duk Oh; Jeong-Hyun Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  The effect of neuromuscular reversal agent on postoperative pain after laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: Comparison between the neostigmine and sugammadex.

Authors:  Tak Kyu Oh; Eunjeong Ji; Hyo-Seok Na
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Should we Routinely Reverse Neuromuscular Blockade with Sugammadex in Patients with a History of Heart Transplantation?

Authors:  Koichi Yuki; Rebecca Scholl
Journal:  Transl Perioper Pain Med       Date:  2020-01-18

10.  An Enhanced Recovery Protocol that Facilitates Same-day Discharge for Simple Laparoscopic Appendectomies.

Authors:  Shabana Z Shafy; Rebecca Miller; Joshsua C Uffman; Joseph D Tobias; Mike Fetzer; Andrew B Nordin; Brian Kenney; Hina Walia; Giorgio Veneziano
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.