Literature DB >> 25543010

Plasma-sprayed titanium coating to polyetheretherketone improves the bone-implant interface.

William R Walsh1, Nicky Bertollo2, Chrisopher Christou2, Dominik Schaffner2, Ralph J Mobbs2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Rapid and stable fixation at the bone-implant interface would be regarded as one of the primary goals to achieve clinical efficacy, regardless of the surgical site. Although mechanical and physical properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) provide advantages for implant devices, the hydrophobic nature and the lack of direct bone contact remains a limitation.
PURPOSE: To examine the effects of a plasma-sprayed titanium coated PEEK on the mechanical and histologic properties at the bone-implant interface. STUDY
SETTING: A preclinical laboratory study.
METHODS: Polyetheretherketone and plasma-sprayed titanium coated PEEK implants (Ti-bond; Spinal Elements, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were placed in a line-to-line manner in cortical bone and in a press-fit manner in cancellous bone of adult sheep using an established ovine model. Shear strength was assessed in the cortical sites at 4 and 12 weeks, whereas histology was performed in cortical and cancellous sites at both time points.
RESULTS: The titanium coating dramatically improved the shear strength at the bone-implant interface at 4 weeks and continued to improve with time compared with PEEK. Direct bone ongrowth in cancellous and cortical sites can be achieved using a plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct bone to implant bonding can be achieved on PEEK in spite of its hydrophobic nature using a plasma-sprayed titanium coating. The plasma-sprayed titanium coating improved mechanical properties in the cortical sites and the histology in cortical and cancellous sites.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Bone ongrowth; Implant fixation; PEEK; Shear strength; Titanium coating

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25543010     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  29 in total

Review 1.  Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation.

Authors:  Yusuf Assem; Ralph J Mobbs; Matthew H Pelletier; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takaneka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices.

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; David L Safranski; J Kenneth Burkus; James L Chappuis; Christopher S D Lee; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall; Kathryn E Smith
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-09-01

4.  Arthrodesis Rate and Patient Reported Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Utilizing a Plasma-Sprayed Titanium Coated PEEK Interbody Implant: A Retrospective, Observational Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Sophea R Bergen; Miranda Staples; Kevin Liang; Ramin Raiszadeh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-13

5.  PEEK versus titanium-coated PEEK cervical cages: fusion rate.

Authors:  Bartosz Godlewski; Adam Bebenek; Maciej Dominiak; Grzegorz Karpinski; Piotr Cieslik; Tomasz Pawelczyk
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Hwabok Wee; Evan P Roush; Tiffany L Whitcomb; Christopher Murter; Gery Kozlansky; Akhlesh Lakhtakia; Allen R Kunselman; Henry J Donahue; April D Armstrong; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Standalone titanium/polyetheretherketone interbody cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiological results at 24 months.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Tajrian Amin; Kevin Phan; Darweesh Al Khawaja; Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Vedran Lovric; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-03-09

8.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Ti- and CaP-Nanocoated Polyetheretherketone Cages: Comparative Study of the 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Karel Willems; Philippe Lauweryns; Gino Verleye; Johan VAN Goethem
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

9.  Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?

Authors:  William R Walsh; Matthew H Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Chris Christou; Chris Tan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  In vivo experimental study of anterior cervical fusion using bioactive polyetheretherketone in a canine model.

Authors:  Takayoshi Shimizu; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Seiji Yamaguchi; Bungo Otsuki; Yaichiro Okuzu; Tomiharu Matsushita; Tadashi Kokubo; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.