Literature DB >> 25542484

The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.

Ying Zhu1, Changfeng Dong2, Yin Yin1, Xin Chen1, Yanrong Guo1, Yi Zheng3, Yuanyuan Shen1, Tianfu Wang1, Xinyu Zhang4, Siping Chen5.   

Abstract

Shear wave based ultrasound elastography utilizes mechanical excitation or acoustic radiation force to induce shear waves in deep tissue. The tissue response is monitored to obtain elasticity information about the tissue. During the past two decades, tissue elasticity has been extensively studied and has been used in clinical disease diagnosis. However, biological soft tissues are viscoelastic in nature. Therefore, they should be simultaneously characterized in terms of elasticity and viscosity. In this study, two shear wave-based elasticity imaging methods, shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) and acoustic radiation force impulsive (ARFI) imaging, were compared. The discrepancy between the measurements obtained by the two methods was analyzed, and the role of viscosity was investigated. To this end, four types of gelatin phantoms containing 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% castor oil were fabricated to mimic different viscosities of soft tissue. For the SDUV method, the shear elasticity μ1 was 3.90 ± 0.27 kPa, 4.49 ± 0.16 kPa, 2.41 ± 0.33 kPa and 1.31 ± 0.09 kPa; and the shear viscosity μ2 was 1.82 ± 0.31 Pa•s, 2.41 ± 0.35 Pa•s, 2.65 ± 0.13 Pa•s and 2.89 ± 0.14 Pa•s for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively in both cases. For the ARFI measurements, the shear elasticity μ was 7.30 ± 0.20 kPa, 8.20 ± 0.31 kPa, 7.42 ± 0.21 kPa and 5.90 ± 0.36 kPa for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively. The SDUV results demonstrated that the elasticity first increased from 0% to 20% oil and then decreased for the 30% and 40% oil. The viscosity decreased consistently as the concentration of castor oil increased from 0% to 40%. The elasticity measured by ARFI showed the same trend as that of the SDUV but exceeded the results measured by SDUV. To clearly validate the impact of viscosity on the elasticity estimation, an independent measurement of the elasticity and viscosity by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was conducted on these four types of gelatin phantoms and then compared with SDUV and ARFI results. The shear elasticities obtained by DMA (3.44 ± 0.31 kPa, 4.29 ± 0.13 kPa, 2.05 ± 0.29 kPa and 1.06 ± 0.18 kPa for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively) were lower than those by SDUV, whereas the shear viscosities obtained by DMA (2.52 ± 0.32 Pa·s, 3.18 ± 0.12 Pa·s, 3.98 ± 0.19 Pa·s and 4.90 ± 0.20 Pa·s for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively) were greater than those obtained by SDUV. However, the DMA results showed that the trend in the elasticity and viscosity data was the same as that obtained from the SDUV and ARFI. The SDUV results demonstrated that adding castor oil changed the viscoelastic properties of the phantoms and resulted in increased dispersion of the shear waves. Viscosity can provide important and independent information about the inner state of the phantoms, in addition to the elasticity. Because the ARFI method ignores the dispersion of the shear waves, namely viscosity, it may bias the estimation of the true elasticity. This study sheds further light on the significance of the viscosity measurements in shear wave based elasticity imaging methods.
Copyright © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARFI; DMA; Elasticity; Oil-in-gelatin phantom; SDUV; Shear wave; Viscosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25542484     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Quantifying tissue viscoelasticity using optical coherence elastography and the Rayleigh wave model.

Authors:  Zhaolong Han; Manmohan Singh; Salavat R Aglyamov; Chih-Hao Liu; Achuth Nair; Raksha Raghunathan; Chen Wu; Jiasong Li; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Improving in situ acoustic intensity estimates using MR acoustic radiation force imaging in combination with multifrequency MR elastography.

Authors:  Ningrui Li; Pooja Gaur; Kristin Quah; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.737

3.  Feasibility of Harmonic Motion Imaging Using a Single Transducer: In Vivo Imaging of Breast Cancer in a Mouse Model and Human Subjects.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Niloufar Saharkhiz; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Phase Velocity Estimation With Expanded Bandwidth in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Tissues.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Viscoelastic Response Ultrasound Derived Relative Elasticity and Relative Viscosity Reflect True Elasticity and Viscosity: In Silico and Experimental Demonstration.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Temperature dependent of viscoelasticity measurement on fat emulsion phantom using acoustic radiation force elasticity imaging method.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Mengke Wang; Yanrong Guo; Huiying Wen; Xin Chen; Siping Chen; Haoming Lin
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.285

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.