Literature DB >> 35762849

Improving in situ acoustic intensity estimates using MR acoustic radiation force imaging in combination with multifrequency MR elastography.

Ningrui Li1, Pooja Gaur2, Kristin Quah1, Kim Butts Pauly2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) enables focal spot localization during nonablative transcranial ultrasound therapies. As the acoustic radiation force is proportional to the applied acoustic intensity, measured MR-ARFI displacements could potentially be used to estimate the acoustic intensity at the target. However, variable brain stiffness is an obstacle. The goal of this study was to develop and assess a method to accurately estimate the acoustic intensity at the focus using MR-ARFI displacements in combination with viscoelastic properties obtained with multifrequency MR elastography (MRE).
METHODS: Phantoms with a range of viscoelastic properties were fabricated, and MR-ARFI displacements were acquired within each phantom using multiple acoustic intensities. Voigt model parameters were estimated for each phantom based on storage and loss moduli measured using multifrequency MRE, and these were used to predict the relationship between acoustic intensity and measured displacement.
RESULTS: Using assumed viscoelastic properties, MR-ARFI displacements alone could not accurately estimate acoustic intensity across phantoms. For example, acoustic intensities were underestimated in phantoms stiffer than the assumed stiffness and overestimated in phantoms softer than the assumed stiffness. This error was greatly reduced using individualized viscoelasticity measurements obtained from MRE.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that viscoelasticity information from MRE could be used in combination with MR-ARFI displacements to obtain more accurate estimates of acoustic intensity. Additionally, Voigt model viscosity parameters were found to be predictive of the relaxation rate of each phantom's time-varying displacement response, which could be used to optimize patient-specific MR-ARFI pulse sequences.
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR-ARFI; MRgFUS; acoustic radiation force imaging; elastography; transcranial focused ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35762849      PMCID: PMC9439407          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   3.737


  52 in total

1.  MR imaging of shear waves generated by focused ultrasound.

Authors:  T Wu; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; S J Riederer; R L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Miniature ultrasound ring array transducers for transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation of freely-moving small animals.

Authors:  Hyunggug Kim; Seongyeon Kim; Nam Suk Sim; Cristina Pasquinelli; Axel Thielscher; Jeong Ho Lee; Hyunjoo J Lee
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  MR acoustic radiation force imaging: in vivo comparison to ultrasound motion tracking.

Authors:  Yuexi Huang; Laura Curiel; Aleksandra Kukic; Donald B Plewes; Rajiv Chopra; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier opening, an integrative review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  Ying Meng; Christopher B Pople; Harriet Lea-Banks; Agessandro Abrahao; Benjamin Davidson; Suganth Suppiah; Laura M Vecchio; Nardin Samuel; Faiza Mahmud; Kullervo Hynynen; Clement Hamani; Nir Lipsman
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Arvin Arani; Matthew C Murphy; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; David S Lake; Scott A Kruse; Clifford R Jack; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Focused ultrasound thalamotomy location determines clinical benefits in patients with essential tremor.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Manish Ranjan; Jidan Zhong; Jurgen Germann; David Xu; Michael L Schwartz; Nir Lipsman; Kullervo Hynynen; Gabriel A Devenyi; Mallar Chakravarty; Eugen Hlasny; Maheleth Llinas; Christopher S Lozano; Gavin J B Elias; Jason Chan; Ailish Coblentz; Alfonso Fasano; Walter Kucharczyk; Mojgan Hodaie; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Regional brain stiffness changes across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; David T Jones; Clifford R Jack; Kevin J Glaser; Matthew L Senjem; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Rickey E Carter; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Viscoelastic response (VisR) imaging for assessment of viscoelasticity in Voigt materials.

Authors:  Mallory R Selzo; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Multiple-point magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Henrik Odéen; Joshua de Bever; Lorne W Hofstetter; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.