Literature DB >> 25542198

Framing of feedback impacts student's satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance.

J M Monica van de Ridder1, Claudia M M Peters, Karel M Stokking, J Alexander de Ru, Olle Th J Ten Cate.   

Abstract

Feedback is considered important to acquire clinical skills. Research evidence shows that feedback does not always improve learning and its effects may be small. In many studies, a variety of variables involved in feedback provision may mask either one of their effects. E.g., there is reason to believe that the way oral feedback is framed may affect its effect if other variables are held constant. In a randomised controlled trial we investigated the effect of positively and negatively framed feedback messages on satisfaction, self-efficacy, and performance. A single blind randomised controlled between-subject design was used, with framing of the feedback message (positively-negatively) as independent variable and examination of hearing abilities as the task. First year medical students' (n = 59) satisfaction, self-efficacy, and performance were the dependent variables and were measured both directly after the intervention and after a 2 weeks delay. Students in the positively framed feedback condition were significantly more satisfied and showed significantly higher self-efficacy measured directly after the performance. Effect sizes found were large, i.e., partial η (2) = 0.43 and η (2) = 0.32 respectively. They showed a better performance throughout the whole study. Significant performance differences were found both at the initial performance and when measured 2 weeks after the intervention: effects were of medium size, respectively r = -.31 and r = -.32. Over time in both conditions performance and self-efficacy decreased. Framing the feedback message in either a positive or negative manner affects students' satisfaction and self-efficacy directly after the intervention be it that these effects seem to fade out over time. Performance may be enhanced by positive framing, but additional studies need to confirm this. We recommend using a positive frame when giving feedback on clinical skills.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25542198     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9567-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  14 in total

1.  Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Karen D Könings; Shiphra Ginsburg; Cees Pm van der Vleuten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  The Use of Feedback in Improving the Knowledge, Attitudes and Skills of Medical Students: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Margareth Alves Bastos E Castro; Regina Lúcia Muniz de Almeida; Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti; Sandra Helena Cerrato Tibiriçá; Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel; Giancarlo Lucchetti
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-10-18

3.  Satisfaction of doctors with their training: evidence from UK.

Authors:  Simon Gregory; Chiara Demartini
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Using conversation analysis to explore feedback on resident performance.

Authors:  Marrigje E Duitsman; Marije van Braak; Wyke Stommel; Marianne Ten Kate-Booij; Jacqueline de Graaf; Cornelia R M G Fluit; Debbie A D C Jaarsma
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  An App to Improve Eating Habits of Adolescents and Young Adults (Challenge to Go): Systematic Development of a Theory-Based and Target Group-Adapted Mobile App Intervention.

Authors:  Anna Rohde; Anja Duensing; Christine Dawczynski; Jasmin Godemann; Stefan Lorkowski; Christine Brombach
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  The pharmacology course for preclinical students using team-based learning.

Authors:  Do-Hwan Kim; Jung-Ho Lee; Soon Ae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-01

7.  Effects of structured written feedback by cards on medical students' performance at Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in an outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Fariba Haghani; Mohammad Hatef Khorami; Mohammad Fakhari
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2016-07

8.  What difficulties do faculty members face when conducting workplace-based assessments in undergraduate clerkships?

Authors:  Hester E M Daelmans; Marianne C Mak-van der Vossen; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi A Kusurkar
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-23

9.  Feedback in medical education - a workshop report with practical examples and recommendations.

Authors:  Christian Thrien; Götz Fabry; Anja Härtl; Claudia Kiessling; Tanja Graupe; Ingrid Preusche; Susanne Pruskil; Kai P Schnabel; Monika Sennekamp; Stefan Rüttermann; Alexander Wünsch
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-15

10.  Effect of face-to-face verbal feedback compared with no or alternative feedback on the objective workplace task performance of health professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christina Elizabeth Johnson; Mihiri P Weerasuria; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.