| Literature DB >> 25542003 |
Ying Zhang1, Lin Li1, Xiaochun Dong1, Mei Kong2, Lu Gao1, Xiaojing Dong3, Wenti Xu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most influenza surveillance is based on data from urban sentinel hospitals; little is known about influenza activity in rural communities. We conducted influenza surveillance in a rural region of China with the aim of detecting influenza activity in the 2009/2010 influenza season.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25542003 PMCID: PMC4277345 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Comparison of weekly ILI% between rural area and urban area, China, 2009/2010 influenza season.
Figure 2Influenza virus isolations among influenza-like (ILI) cases in a rural area, China, 2009/2010 influenza season.
Figure 3Comparison between ILI% and OTC drug sales in a rural area, China, 2009/2010 influenza season.
The space time clusters of ILI in a rural Community, China, 2009/2010 influenza season.
| Signals | Date of cluster | observed cases | Expected cases | Relative risk | P value |
| A | 2009.10.13–22 | 70 | 26.59 | 27.44 | 0.001 |
| B | 2009.11.3–11.12 | 77 | 42.58 | 13.23 | 0.001 |
| C | 2009.10.25–11.5 | 21 | 6.52 | 10.4 | 0.001 |
| D | 2009.11.25–2010.1.26 | 53 | 28.43 | 9.99 | 0.001 |
Figure 4ILI cluster detection by using a space-time permutation model in a rural area, China, 2009/2010 influenza season.
The incidence rate of ILI/influenza in general population from October 2009 to March 2010.
| Year | Month | ILI | ILI incidence rate% | Influenza case | Influenza incidence rate% |
| 2009 | October | 153 | 1.83 | 5 | 0.06 |
| November | 216 | 2.58 | 7 | 0.08 | |
| December | 31 | 0.37 | 9 | 0.11 | |
| 2010 | January | 21 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.04 |
| February | 4 | 0.05 | 3 | 0.04 | |
| March | 9 | 0.11 | 6 | 0.07 | |
| Total | 434 | 5.19 | 33 | 0.40 |
Abbreviation: ILI, influenza like illness
The total population number is 40000, the proportion of the census population who seek care in the sites when got ILI symptom was 20.9%.